Une plate-forme pétrolière s'effondre de façon spectaculaire sur la côte norvégienne, et les chercheurs tentent de découvrir ce qui s'est passé lorsqu'ils réalisent que ce n'est que le début... Tout lireUne plate-forme pétrolière s'effondre de façon spectaculaire sur la côte norvégienne, et les chercheurs tentent de découvrir ce qui s'est passé lorsqu'ils réalisent que ce n'est que le début de quelque chose d'encore plus grave.Une plate-forme pétrolière s'effondre de façon spectaculaire sur la côte norvégienne, et les chercheurs tentent de découvrir ce qui s'est passé lorsqu'ils réalisent que ce n'est que le début de quelque chose d'encore plus grave.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire et 5 nominations au total
- Gunn
- (English version)
- (voix)
- Stian Birkeland
- (English version)
- (voix)
Avis à la une
I must admit that I have been thoroughly entertained by these movies, and "Nordsjøen" proved to be equally enjoyable. So writers Harald Rosenløw-Eeg and Lars Gudmestad definitely managed to put together a good storyline for "Nordsjøen". Sure, there wasn't a whole lot of destruction and mayhem in this movie, which was a shame, but "Nordsjøen" was a very well-written story-driven movie. And the story was spiced up with a natural disaster. So it was actually still quite enjoyable.
For me, then I felt it was a shame that there wasn't more focus on the destructive forces of the disaster, because I was sort of expecting that. But luckily then director John Andreas Andersen managed to put writers Harald Rosenløw-Eeg and Lars Gudmestad's script to life on the screen in a very enjoyable and entertaining manner.
The acting performances were good in "Nordsjøen". And I wasn't familiar with the cast here, but they definitely put on good performances to bring the movie to life. I was sort of expecting to see actor Kristoffer Joner here, as he was in both "Bølgen" and "Skjelvet", but he wasn't here.
Visually then "Nordsjøen" was pretty good, I liked the special effects and it definitely came off as being realistic and added a lot of flavor to the movie.
If you enjoy disaster movies, then "Nordsjøen" is well-worth watching.
My rating of "Nordsjøen" lands on a six out of ten stars.
It started off with The Wave (Bølgen) in 2015 (Director: Roar Uthaug, Writers: John Kåre Raake and Harald Rosenløw-Eeg) which was 9/10.
Followed by The Quake (Skjelvet) (The Quake) in 2018 (Director: John Andreas Andersen, same writers as The Wave) which was 7/10.
Followed by The Tunnel (Tunnelen) in 2019 (Director: Pål Øie, Writer Kjersti Helen Rasmussen) which also was 7/10.
And now The Burning Sea (Nordsjøen) in 2021. (John Andreas Andersen, Writers: Harald Rosenløw-Eeg and Lars Gudmestad) which I think is 8/10.
Before this Norwegian disaster movies did hardly exist, maybe with the exception of People in the sun (Mennesker i Solen) from 2011 which has a funny approach and which I think is under-appreciated and I also loved to an 8/10.
The team behind The Wave was also behind The Quake, which is some kind of follow-up, and now this The Burning Sea, while The Tunnel was an exception.
Well, this is a step up, both when it comes to the catastrophe as well as in effects. The CGI is, like in them all superb. No wonder Hollywood searches Norway for CGI-talents, as all these movies are made on what would be a shoestring budget in Hollywood. The story is also good, and quite believable, though of course there are plot holes, and things that are not drawn out too much, hence the length of the movie.
I was on the egde of my theater seat along the way. Even if I didn't like very much the kid-story took too much place. Bu well done! I hope for more Norwegian disasters!
This movies has it strong sides like a good acting from the whole cast, interesting plot, and driven action without unreal things (like Dwayne Johnson failing out of the skyscraper, mundane routine in a movie "Skyscraper" (2018)). Unfortunately, this movie also has negative sides like copying American style of movies (examples above can be considered), obviously somewhere & somehow scenario is predictable, and "fancy" cultural contrast (It is not about Norway, it is about representation how scenes and certain actions showed).
Overall, it is a good movie and good story. The plot is interesting and has interesting twists. It is showing action from on side and beauty of culture from another side. Definitely, not a waste of time but sadly contain some vivid cliché. If it would had editing in regards of the scenario and cut in chronométrage, it could be 10 out of 10.
P. S: If you are in Greenpeace or in WWF, or fan of Greta Thunberg, you might have a serious "burnout" / "butthurt" particularly close to the end of the movie ;)
However, someone forgot to turn image stabilization on. Awful capturing... If you are into movies you'll realize it from the first second.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe company Eelume featured in the movie exists in real life, and its snake-like underwater robots are real products.
- GaffesThe movies poster contains an underwater sub in which a person can sit. It also shows a scuba diver in full gear diving underwater. Neither of the two can be seen back in the movie. An unmanned ROV is used and there are no divers in the movie.
- Citations
William Lie: We thought we were an oil nation
William Lie: But we are really an ocean nation.
Meilleurs choix
- How long is The Burning Sea?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 493 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 371 $US
- 27 févr. 2022
- Montant brut mondial
- 4 025 723 $US
- Durée1 heure 44 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1