NOTE IMDb
3,8/10
1,3 k
MA NOTE
Gwen le chat et Roger le chien sont des agents secrets qui protègent et sauvent secrètement le monde sans que les humains ne le sache.Gwen le chat et Roger le chien sont des agents secrets qui protègent et sauvent secrètement le monde sans que les humains ne le sache.Gwen le chat et Roger le chien sont des agents secrets qui protègent et sauvent secrètement le monde sans que les humains ne le sache.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 3 nominations au total
Lauren K. Robek
- Max's Mom (Susan)
- (as Kirsten Robek)
Garry Chalk
- Old Ed
- (voix)
Michael Daingerfield
- Duke
- (voix)
Pauline Newstone
- Sis
- (voix)
Christina Lewall
- Shaggy Dog
- (voix)
- (as Christina Meredith Lewall)
Noel Johansen
- Schnauzer
- (voix)
Avis à la une
The reviews for this film are the most unfair I have ever seen. It is a bit of fun with talking animals. It has a nice story line, good characters, some laugh out loud moments and a nice ending. As long as you don't take the film seriously it has entertainment value.
Clearly written for a very young audience, personally I was bored to death, let the franchise end here.
A predictable plot with some awkward acting can't be weighed against the quite well-done special effects of the animals talking. Obviously, as stated by others here, humour is a bit lacking in this 3rd episode, but overall they tried their best and gave me and my 9y old son a pleasant afternoon out in these miserable covid days
With a script that reads like it was written by a group of 13-year-olds between social media binges and a cast not even qualified to work as extras on a daytime soap opera, this abomination ticks all the boxes for a movie to steer well clear of.
Harry, Albert, Sam and Jack (the Warner brothers who created Warner Brothers) wouldn't just be turning - they'd be spinning in their graves if they could see just what pathetic depths their company has sunk to.
Don't bother wasting your time or money on this one. Even if it was shown as in-flight entertainment with no other option, you'll be reaching for the "off" switch within the first few minutes. No, I'm not exaggerating - it's universally unwatchable, no matter your age.
Harry, Albert, Sam and Jack (the Warner brothers who created Warner Brothers) wouldn't just be turning - they'd be spinning in their graves if they could see just what pathetic depths their company has sunk to.
Don't bother wasting your time or money on this one. Even if it was shown as in-flight entertainment with no other option, you'll be reaching for the "off" switch within the first few minutes. No, I'm not exaggerating - it's universally unwatchable, no matter your age.
Cats and Dogs (2001) had a interesting idea but it wasn't funny, along with the weird looking CGI for the cats and dogs talking.
Cats and Dogs: Revenge of Kitty Galore (2010) was basically just like the first movie, it just added more stupid scenes and a annoying villain.
Now we have Cat and Dogs 3: Paws Unite (2020). After watching it I am sure this is definitely the worst of the 3 movies.
The CG with the talking mouths is bad, the jokes are not funny and obvious, and the characters are annoying. Especially the villain
The voice acting is average and the plot is pretty straight forward. Plot: Cats and dogs are working together but a bird villain is doing something to have them fight. It was a pretty standard plot.
It will mostly just cut to the villain doing weird and random things that didn't connect to the story. Most of the time I was asking "what is going on?".
This is pretty forgettable and I guess kids can be distracted by it. I didn't find it entertaining or funny, I just found it annoying.
Cats and Dogs: Revenge of Kitty Galore (2010) was basically just like the first movie, it just added more stupid scenes and a annoying villain.
Now we have Cat and Dogs 3: Paws Unite (2020). After watching it I am sure this is definitely the worst of the 3 movies.
The CG with the talking mouths is bad, the jokes are not funny and obvious, and the characters are annoying. Especially the villain
The voice acting is average and the plot is pretty straight forward. Plot: Cats and dogs are working together but a bird villain is doing something to have them fight. It was a pretty standard plot.
It will mostly just cut to the villain doing weird and random things that didn't connect to the story. Most of the time I was asking "what is going on?".
This is pretty forgettable and I guess kids can be distracted by it. I didn't find it entertaining or funny, I just found it annoying.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe name of the opposition opponent of the final tennis game in the film is 'McNamara'. The name of this films' director is Sean McNamara.
- GaffesThe number of cans Pablo announces that he is attempting to fly over and the number of cans lined up on the table are not the same. Not even close. He actually flies over nearly twice as many cans as he announced, yet the attempt is deemed to be a failure.
- Citations
Gwen the Cat: Garfield
- ConnexionsFollows Comme chiens et chats (2001)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Cats & Dogs 3: Paws Unite?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Chiens et Chats 3: Patte dans la Patte
- Lieux de tournage
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 5 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 5 300 000 $US
- Durée
- 1h 24min(84 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant