3 A.M.

nothing good to say about this movie at all . bad plot, bad dialog, bad camera angles and bad actors. I'm pretty sure the inspired by true event was some BS. i think the "true event" was probably something like a radio turned on once at 3:00 am and they wrote the whole dumb script on it and call it a ghost story inspired by true event. BS movie not worth watching. someone should tell the directors or whoever not to make any movies no more and get a job as a waiter or janitor. they should actually pay us for the time we spent watching this piece of junk. just plain awful. and this IMDb thing is making me type all this so i make the 10 line minimum so i can post this comment.

I respect the enthusiasm and efforts needed to create an indie film, but that is about all I can respect about 3am. Greg Niecestro's poorly crafted script features an almost indiscernible plot. Even more confusing than the storyline was Greg's decision to cast himself as the main character, Michael. Viewers expect emotion from a character confused by love and terrorized by creepy events, but "stoneface" Greg brought zero emotion to his character. His dialog was on par with a Cinemax soft core porn. I was hoping some of the scenes with attractive actresses featured at least partial nudity. There are several quality scenes, but the bright spots are overshadowed by the terrible script and acting. I was waiting for a boom mic to drop into the picture, but I don't believe this low budget release utilized boom mics. Ayal Stern did a serviceable job in the role of Kenny, standing out as the polished turd in a sea of diarrhea. I'd be somewhat interested to see what Ayal Stern could do with a better script and production.

based on the cover i thought the movie was going to be a scary slasher flick. i lOvE slashers, but i was pleasantly surprised by this. The story takes a surprising, if somewhat disappointing, turn as a love story. That being said, the story successfully merges the horror and romance genres. I thought most of the acting was good with a few exceptions. If you are looking for straight up action, this is not the movie to get. If you have the patience to sit through a slowly developing story, you just might enjoy this movie. also since this is a 'true story' i checked out the true story feature and i thought it was kinda funny how close some of the true story matched with the movie. Is is really a 'true story'??? I don't know, but its worth a look id say.

again i am on my own here, saying that this movie is not as bad as all the other reviews make it out to be. The ending goes a bit random and a too big a twist for my liking but never the less, not a bad film. i picked this film up from tescos and i watched it the same day, not as scary as the back might lead you on for but never the less, it still has its moments. I think they should make a second movie in this series. and the title is not 3.A.M it is paranormal ascendancy . they made the film drag on a bit in the middle and towards the end but it all does in a weird way come together and make sense at the end. but in the middle you will get really confused but don't worry it will make sense.

20 minutes into this and I was already thinking it's the worse film I've ever seen and nothing else could possibly be worse, ever. It looks like it's filmed in a potato and the sound recorded on a carrot. The direction and writing is completely incoherent. The acting is laughable. There's really nothing more to say about the film. I can see why the director and writer never went on to do anything else.