NOTE IMDb
5,6/10
558
MA NOTE
Maddie, une historienne de l'art, parcourt le monde pour trouver la pierre des amoureux, mais quand elle rencontre Fitz, sa recherche la mènera peut-être finalement au véritable amour.Maddie, une historienne de l'art, parcourt le monde pour trouver la pierre des amoureux, mais quand elle rencontre Fitz, sa recherche la mènera peut-être finalement au véritable amour.Maddie, une historienne de l'art, parcourt le monde pour trouver la pierre des amoureux, mais quand elle rencontre Fitz, sa recherche la mènera peut-être finalement au véritable amour.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Tanya Christiansen
- Catherine
- (as Tanya Christensen)
Morgan Christiansen
- Festival Attendee
- (non crédité)
Sheri Lahris
- Restaurant Patron
- (non crédité)
Luis Reyres
- Archaeology Student
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
It was cute, but so incredibly unrealistic.
Those damn heeled boots she wore to go hiking in?!! I mean, what the hell!? ANY experienced hiker (and archaeologist) would know never to use that kind of footwear! And when they were digging in the sand, with a pickaxe!? Honestly, those might have been little things, but I found them so annoying to the point of hilarity.
I managed to make it to the end, which is something. A one-time watch if you can make it through.
Those damn heeled boots she wore to go hiking in?!! I mean, what the hell!? ANY experienced hiker (and archaeologist) would know never to use that kind of footwear! And when they were digging in the sand, with a pickaxe!? Honestly, those might have been little things, but I found them so annoying to the point of hilarity.
I managed to make it to the end, which is something. A one-time watch if you can make it through.
Reused plot as in Pearl in Paradise with minor efforts of writing, directing etc, some nonsense and errors here and there, but nice locations, great lead actress, main actor had less expressivity, but I find it understandable. No great chemistry, but an enjoyable movie overall!
One of so many romances suported by impressive locations and a presumed erudition. Nothing original or realistic or romantic. But good ocasion to use a fairy tale theme in superficial manner. And this is, in good measure, what real matters.
Not so bad acting ( sure, with some indulgence), not awful story ( the dose of indulgence becomes more serious ) . The air of presumed air of treasure hunter, the legends and the diaries, books are good tools for reasonable chain of adventures and illusion of romance. The good point - the comunity spirit.
In short, a poor film with some presumed sparkles. And this is all.
Not so bad acting ( sure, with some indulgence), not awful story ( the dose of indulgence becomes more serious ) . The air of presumed air of treasure hunter, the legends and the diaries, books are good tools for reasonable chain of adventures and illusion of romance. The good point - the comunity spirit.
In short, a poor film with some presumed sparkles. And this is all.
The lead actors are some of the most annoying I've seen & the storyline is similar to Pearl in Paradise which has far more credible actors/acting. The only redeeming feature of this film is the stunning location.
Whatever Up Tv is - they should find another genre - this film has a great and creative story and beautiful scenery but just didn't deliver when it came to script and cast - no chemistry, no genuineness.... worth watching just for the fun story but only just.....
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe name of the island Cordecil is a misspelling or a corruption of the phrase in French "Coeur du Ciel" which translates as Heart of Heaven.
- GaffesIn the very first scene when Maddie is looking at the art pieces, there is a radical change in her voice when she says a sentence turning to the woman who asks how she can tell they are fakes. She explains "The signature..." in her first recorded voice, but then continues the sentence "is in Arabic, not hieroglyphs" in a deeper, louder voice clearly overdubbed and poorly edited.
- Citations
Andrew Fitzpatrick: So we're currently driving on the first modern road on the island, Highway 1.
Maddie Turner: Is there a Highway 2?
Andrew Fitzpatrick: No.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 29min(89 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant