Return of the Ghostbusters
- 2007
- 1h 25min
NOTE IMDb
5,2/10
1,3 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueThe Ghost Adventures crew return to tackle the terrors of the night.The Ghost Adventures crew return to tackle the terrors of the night.The Ghost Adventures crew return to tackle the terrors of the night.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
B.J. Eaton
- Konstin's Assistant
- (as Brandon Eaton)
K.C. Weatherman
- Homeless Joe
- (as KC Weatherman)
Ethan S. Knightchilde
- Network Producer
- (as Ethan Knightchilde)
Tanner L. Cole
- Building Superintendent
- (as Tanner Cole)
Avis à la une
When I think of fan films, I cringe. In fact, sequels or remakes created by professional, authorized, official production companies cause me various levels gastric distress. (I Spy, Thunderbirds, Star Trek I, War of the Worlds, The Day the Earth Stood Still, Invasion of the Body Snatchers just to name a few) Naturally I was skeptical when I started watching Return of the Ghostbusters online. But, instead of being a laughable (or unbearable) gushing, goofy fan mess, it's actually
(I can't believe I'm saying this) It's actually GOOD!!! And, good on just about every level.
They show superb understanding and respect for the original, while being able to pick up the pieces and make their own mark with the work. That ain't an easy task! The plot was interesting and original and included several character stories providing motivation and context for character actions and interactions. Apart from a good script and nice pacing, the cinematography is PDGwell framed and nicely lit, SFX, acting, comedy sense, characters all deserve special note.
The Plucky Girl Reporter is gorgeous and adorable. The boys are engaging and equally adorable. It's all great fun to watch.
I'm not saying it's Citizen Kane, but considering it's an amateur work, it's pretty impressive. Clearly these are not just a bunch of idiots with a VHS camera. They're a bunch of very TALENTED idiots with many skills (not unlike Ackroyd, Reitman, Ramis, Murray et al).
Great work folks! Hope you get to make more of these, or better yet I hope you get snapped up as professional filmmakers. Thanks!
They show superb understanding and respect for the original, while being able to pick up the pieces and make their own mark with the work. That ain't an easy task! The plot was interesting and original and included several character stories providing motivation and context for character actions and interactions. Apart from a good script and nice pacing, the cinematography is PDGwell framed and nicely lit, SFX, acting, comedy sense, characters all deserve special note.
The Plucky Girl Reporter is gorgeous and adorable. The boys are engaging and equally adorable. It's all great fun to watch.
I'm not saying it's Citizen Kane, but considering it's an amateur work, it's pretty impressive. Clearly these are not just a bunch of idiots with a VHS camera. They're a bunch of very TALENTED idiots with many skills (not unlike Ackroyd, Reitman, Ramis, Murray et al).
Great work folks! Hope you get to make more of these, or better yet I hope you get snapped up as professional filmmakers. Thanks!
10eric_j81
As a die hard fan of the ghostbusters I was blown away when I saw Freddy VS Ghostbusters. I told my friends and family about it and showed the film to everybody who would watch. When I heard a follow up film was being produced my expectations were pretty high. I was absolutely floored when I watched the Return of the Ghostbusters. This film is Hank Braxton's Rocky Balboa to the film industry's Apollo Creed begging for just one chance, one opportunity to shine. While lacking the fanfare and budgets of a major movie production, what this movie does bring to the table is tons of heart and an obvious love for both the craft of film making as well as a love for the source material. Return of the Ghostbusters improves upon Braxton Films' earlier Ghostbuster fan film in every category: Cinematography, Acting, Scenery, Pacing, Casting, Effects, Audio, Script -- the list goes on. If you have ever even been so much as a casual fan of Ghostbusters, consider yourself a connoisseur of pop culture or are simply a fan of independent artists you owe it to yourself to watch this film. Rarely will a major motion picture capture the heart, dedication and love for the craft that this picture has produced in spades.
Having watched the film dozens of times (for studying purposes), it becomes clear that one should not expect a $144M budget type of movie. Instead, for $3,000, all the heart and fun that stretched dollars can afford are put on screen.
The film sure has its cheesy moments and it has to be expected instead of hoping for a miracle. And in some ways, this fan film is sort of a miracle in itself. You have quirky characters, a clichéd villain, the reporter (who reminded me a lot of TMNT's April O'Neil for some reason) and a few great action scenes for the tight budget they had.
The camera work is interesting and is much more determined to shoot a cool looking scene than most fan films I've seen lying around. Not that they're any bad, but it's nice to dissect them and try and see where there are a few problems, where scenes could be trimmed, etc.
This film could have used a bit of trimming or a few extra takes instead of keeping a scene where the same word can be heard two or three times. Not to be picky, it just creates a redundancy that slowly can cripple the narrative when repeated too many times. Although I'm sure these were most unintentional and they do not hinder my fun of watching it.
Knowing that this is a low budget production, I was pleasantly surprised to see the amount of accuracy, the fun, the efforts to try and tell an original story, to have a few references to the original Ghostbusters while also covering its own grounds. The film does mention some of the original characters, but that's where the movie gets some of its best fun: talking about other fictional characters, thus making them seem more real, as well as the Ghostbusters name and the overall story at the same time.
It's not a Stanley Kubrick film, and it's not a Rolland Emmerich film either. It's a Hank Braxtan film. The man wrote and directed it and before that, he did the same with "Freddy VS. Ghostbusters", another fun short film featuring some of the characters seen in "Return".
For doing all this by himself, and for the fun results I still enjoy to this day, I'd say he's more than earned my eternal respect.
The film sure has its cheesy moments and it has to be expected instead of hoping for a miracle. And in some ways, this fan film is sort of a miracle in itself. You have quirky characters, a clichéd villain, the reporter (who reminded me a lot of TMNT's April O'Neil for some reason) and a few great action scenes for the tight budget they had.
The camera work is interesting and is much more determined to shoot a cool looking scene than most fan films I've seen lying around. Not that they're any bad, but it's nice to dissect them and try and see where there are a few problems, where scenes could be trimmed, etc.
This film could have used a bit of trimming or a few extra takes instead of keeping a scene where the same word can be heard two or three times. Not to be picky, it just creates a redundancy that slowly can cripple the narrative when repeated too many times. Although I'm sure these were most unintentional and they do not hinder my fun of watching it.
Knowing that this is a low budget production, I was pleasantly surprised to see the amount of accuracy, the fun, the efforts to try and tell an original story, to have a few references to the original Ghostbusters while also covering its own grounds. The film does mention some of the original characters, but that's where the movie gets some of its best fun: talking about other fictional characters, thus making them seem more real, as well as the Ghostbusters name and the overall story at the same time.
It's not a Stanley Kubrick film, and it's not a Rolland Emmerich film either. It's a Hank Braxtan film. The man wrote and directed it and before that, he did the same with "Freddy VS. Ghostbusters", another fun short film featuring some of the characters seen in "Return".
For doing all this by himself, and for the fun results I still enjoy to this day, I'd say he's more than earned my eternal respect.
That would be an understatement.
Never before, in the history of fan-film-making, has there been such dedication and passion put into a film that would yield NO financial benefits whatsoever. This was a film (video, movie, whatever) put together BY fans, FOR fans, period. If you liked Ghostbusters and Ghostbusters II, you'd be hard pressed not to believe that this was Ghostbusters III.
The cast, those returning from 'Freddy Vs. Ghostbusters' and the newcomers, really pull this piece together. I especially thought that Wiess gave an amazing performance.
How many fan-films can boast original music? Well, Jon Vandergriff, along with a few other contributors, make this one a first! The score to this film, from the opening credits, to the ending ones, is nothing short of fantastic.
Now let's talk about the special FX. Wow. When you watch this film, you understand that it is a film made with limited money, resources, and materials, but that's the LAST thing you think when you see the FX. The crew behind the visual fx in 'Return' did their jobs, and they did it well.
I could go on and on, but the bottom line is that this is an amazing film, as both a fanfilm and a standalone film. It is better than its predecessor in every way (don't get me wrong, I love FvGB).
SEE IT.
Never before, in the history of fan-film-making, has there been such dedication and passion put into a film that would yield NO financial benefits whatsoever. This was a film (video, movie, whatever) put together BY fans, FOR fans, period. If you liked Ghostbusters and Ghostbusters II, you'd be hard pressed not to believe that this was Ghostbusters III.
The cast, those returning from 'Freddy Vs. Ghostbusters' and the newcomers, really pull this piece together. I especially thought that Wiess gave an amazing performance.
How many fan-films can boast original music? Well, Jon Vandergriff, along with a few other contributors, make this one a first! The score to this film, from the opening credits, to the ending ones, is nothing short of fantastic.
Now let's talk about the special FX. Wow. When you watch this film, you understand that it is a film made with limited money, resources, and materials, but that's the LAST thing you think when you see the FX. The crew behind the visual fx in 'Return' did their jobs, and they did it well.
I could go on and on, but the bottom line is that this is an amazing film, as both a fanfilm and a standalone film. It is better than its predecessor in every way (don't get me wrong, I love FvGB).
SEE IT.
I give this a 5 for effects a 4 on script mainly for the "bad guy" and Egon's dialog that's it. The rest of the script they should have burned it. Get ready for the cheese when you watch this one. Now I fully understand the meaning of cheesy and we all know what cheese is made from old milk and that's what this is. They stole lines from the original maybe to make it better in their minds. This script is trash. I read the other reviews, I am not sure what movie they saw but they must be either geeks or the actors. This insults the great creation that is Ghost busters. This is worse then that extreme ghost buster cartoon, that also sucks monkey balls. They tried I give them that, but it is painful to watch. They had the tools but no talent with this one, except for Egon they were on the money with him and the bad guy is OK he needs work though. Watch if you must see everything that is ghost busters only, otherwise skip and watch some classic ghost buster cartoons on youtube.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis film was made on a budget of around $3,000.00, and took over eight months to shoot. Two CGI artists worked for another eighteen months to complete the film's more than 200 effects shots.
- Citations
Neil Anderson: What the hell do know about woman anyway?
Pavel Karnov: Woman are just like confidence. Watch this. Hello, lady. I know someone who wants to beat your ass.
Girl at Bar: Oh, yeah? Who?
Pavel Karnov: My balls.
Girl at Bar: You're cute.
Pavel Karnov: See?
Neil Anderson: You gotta be shitting me, man. That's the worst line I've ever heard.
- ConnexionsFollowed by Ghostbusters SLC (2010)
- Bandes originalesSoul 2 Soul
Written and Performed by Riverseed
copyright 2007 RS
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Возвращение охотников за привидениями
- Lieux de tournage
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Return of the Ghostbusters (2007) officially released in India in English?
Répondre