NOTE IMDb
5,2/10
68 k
MA NOTE
Quand il décide de démissionner car son travail l'empêche de trouver l'amour, un gardien de zoo reçoit l'aide inattendue des animaux du parc, qui vont lui enseigner les secrets de la nature.... Tout lireQuand il décide de démissionner car son travail l'empêche de trouver l'amour, un gardien de zoo reçoit l'aide inattendue des animaux du parc, qui vont lui enseigner les secrets de la nature...Quand il décide de démissionner car son travail l'empêche de trouver l'amour, un gardien de zoo reçoit l'aide inattendue des animaux du parc, qui vont lui enseigner les secrets de la nature...
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire et 2 nominations au total
Nicholas Turturro
- Manny
- (as Nick Turturro)
Avis à la une
Went to see Zookeeper last night at a charity screening for the Franklin Park Zoo and I actually had high hopes. I knew Kevin James would provide the usual frenetic, bumbling, stammering but well-intentioned physical comedy, the romantic component would be something only a Hollywood movie could conjure, and the talking/emoting animals would probably get old quick, but I hoped the combination of elements would result in a winning story. Alas, I was only partially rewarded. The animals far outshine the humans in this movie, and the TGI Friday's scene is where the animal/human connection is at its best (I never had a night like that at TGIF!), but the human story is all too familiar and the characters can only try to raise a script that fails to add anything new to the cinematic landscape. Overall a decent effort, a few chuckles, but nothing new. And two people near me commented that Ken Jeong's typically icky character was totally unnecessary for this film.
This film is about a dedicated zoo keeper who has to give up his job to get the girl of his dreams.
"Zookeeper" may be funny on paper, as it stars an established comedian, has lots of talking animals and has lots of romantic elements. However, the end result is not funny. It's actually annoying. Seeing Kevin James pretending to be various animals may be funny the first time, but is not funny the tenth time. His friendship with animals is well developed, in fact too well developed to the point of being ridiculous. Are we really supposed to believe that a gorilla can go into a restaurant without sparking panic and chaos?
"Zookeeper" does have some positive aspects. The scene where Kevin James and Rosario Dawson go to a wedding is very well done, the scenes involving silky drapes are wow-inducing. And Kevin James look truly blissful when he enjoys the sensation of flying. The romantic comedy elements are also well done. It is entertaining if you are looking for some brainless and silly laughs.
"Zookeeper" may be funny on paper, as it stars an established comedian, has lots of talking animals and has lots of romantic elements. However, the end result is not funny. It's actually annoying. Seeing Kevin James pretending to be various animals may be funny the first time, but is not funny the tenth time. His friendship with animals is well developed, in fact too well developed to the point of being ridiculous. Are we really supposed to believe that a gorilla can go into a restaurant without sparking panic and chaos?
"Zookeeper" does have some positive aspects. The scene where Kevin James and Rosario Dawson go to a wedding is very well done, the scenes involving silky drapes are wow-inducing. And Kevin James look truly blissful when he enjoys the sensation of flying. The romantic comedy elements are also well done. It is entertaining if you are looking for some brainless and silly laughs.
After reading some of the reviews for this movie, it is absolutely clear that most of the previous reviewers didn't get the point of the movie. It is a FAMILY movie.
You don't go to movies to see what you can pick apart, and then write a review that is already predisposed negatively against it. That's just stupid. Anyone who goes into a movie with the attitude they are going to hate the movie no matter, and writes an extremely negative review is an idiot. The reason to go to movies is to be entertained.
Zookeeper was a movie that entertained. The performances by all the cast members were very well done. There were a lot of laughs, and there was a lot of fun. My son, who by the way is 7, was in the perfect demographic for this movie. It had interesting characters, and situations.
For an adult, a movie with talking animals might not be your cup of tea, but for a small child, it is awesome. Yes, a child thinks it's funny when someone smashes into something or someone. Yes, for an adult, the movie might seem predictable, but truthfully, what movie isn't somewhat predictable? A young child (for whom the movie was made for) isn't going to be scrutinizing every tiny, single thing in a movie, just to say, " A-HA! SEE, I KNEW IT!". A child goes to the movies to be lost in imagination. My son laughed when there was a funny part. Whether it was funny because of the animals, or the humans, I heard a lot of laughter. And yes, I laughed a lot too, and so did my wife.
I believe that anyone who goes into this movie with the understanding that this is a movie targeted towards families with young children, that they will be entertained. This movie hits the mark for the appropriate audience members it was made for.
You don't go to movies to see what you can pick apart, and then write a review that is already predisposed negatively against it. That's just stupid. Anyone who goes into a movie with the attitude they are going to hate the movie no matter, and writes an extremely negative review is an idiot. The reason to go to movies is to be entertained.
Zookeeper was a movie that entertained. The performances by all the cast members were very well done. There were a lot of laughs, and there was a lot of fun. My son, who by the way is 7, was in the perfect demographic for this movie. It had interesting characters, and situations.
For an adult, a movie with talking animals might not be your cup of tea, but for a small child, it is awesome. Yes, a child thinks it's funny when someone smashes into something or someone. Yes, for an adult, the movie might seem predictable, but truthfully, what movie isn't somewhat predictable? A young child (for whom the movie was made for) isn't going to be scrutinizing every tiny, single thing in a movie, just to say, " A-HA! SEE, I KNEW IT!". A child goes to the movies to be lost in imagination. My son laughed when there was a funny part. Whether it was funny because of the animals, or the humans, I heard a lot of laughter. And yes, I laughed a lot too, and so did my wife.
I believe that anyone who goes into this movie with the understanding that this is a movie targeted towards families with young children, that they will be entertained. This movie hits the mark for the appropriate audience members it was made for.
After reading some of the unfair reviews this film has received I felt compelled to add my two cents. Yes it's a formula film, yes we've all seen it before, yes you can see the plot coming a mile away.
Honestly, I expected to hate this film... I'm not a big fan of the lead and I normally do not like these types of films, but 30 minutes in I was won over (maybe it was all the animals). This is a light-hearted family film and should be taken for what it is. If you have kids, they will absolutely love it.
The big name actors voicing the animals was a pleasant surprise and the animal animation and "acting" was very believable.
A very enjoyable film.
Honestly, I expected to hate this film... I'm not a big fan of the lead and I normally do not like these types of films, but 30 minutes in I was won over (maybe it was all the animals). This is a light-hearted family film and should be taken for what it is. If you have kids, they will absolutely love it.
The big name actors voicing the animals was a pleasant surprise and the animal animation and "acting" was very believable.
A very enjoyable film.
Some basic background about me and this movie: I honestly did not want to see this movie. I walked out of Eddie Murphy's Dr. Doolittle years ago, and thought this would be about the same. I'm also not a big Kevin James fan. Then, my Niece (who is in her 30's) told me she took her three young children (all under the age of seven) to see this movie a few days ago. She told me that the kids seemed to basically like the movie, but that she "loved it"... finding it an over-all fun and fast-paced-humor movie. Despite my serious doubts, I went today with a friend. Look... this is not a top ten comedy of all time movie. However, I left having the same feelings about it as my Niece (which surprised me very much.) The bottom line for me: Really loved getting to see and hear so many fantastic movie stars! Cher! Adam Sandler! Don Rickles! Well... there are tons of stars in this movie. And... what a great treat to have about two hours with good natured humor, back to back jokes and humor that gives you lots of giggles - but not a crack-you-up laugh-till-you-cry movie. Not meant to get an Academy Award, but it made me smile and feel good about going to the movies again (at age 42.) Look, this movie was worth the $8 to see in a theater. Really glad I went to see it. I'm a bit shocked to read to many bad reviews, and I really didn't want to see this movie. Lot's of memorable lines. And, there were a few heart-warming moments, too.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesSteffiana De La Cruz (Robin) is Kevin James' wife in real-life.
- Gaffes(at around 12 mins) Contrary to popular belief, porcupines cannot "shoot" quills.
- Citations
Griffin Keyes: How long have you been able to talk?
Donald the Monkey: Let's see, today's Tuesday so... always.
- ConnexionsFeatured in The Tonight Show with Jay Leno: Épisode #19.168 (2011)
- Bandes originalesI'll Supply the Love
Written by David Paich (as David F. Paich)
Performed by TOTO
Courtesy of Columbia Records
By arrangement with Sony Music Licensing
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Zookeeper?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- El guardián del zoológico
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 80 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 80 360 843 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 20 065 617 $US
- 10 juil. 2011
- Montant brut mondial
- 169 852 759 $US
- Durée1 heure 42 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Zookeeper - Le Héros des animaux (2011) officially released in India in Hindi?
Répondre