Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA young woman participates in a medical study. After a series of nightmares and unusual side effects, the line between dreams and reality is blurred. She finds herself on the run from those ... Tout lireA young woman participates in a medical study. After a series of nightmares and unusual side effects, the line between dreams and reality is blurred. She finds herself on the run from those involved, desperate to uncover the truth.A young woman participates in a medical study. After a series of nightmares and unusual side effects, the line between dreams and reality is blurred. She finds herself on the run from those involved, desperate to uncover the truth.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
Nice idea behind the story. But it continues very boring without any excitement. Really bad . Waste of time . I hated it .
Let me start by saying i worked on this film.
For the haters. Get over yourselves.
We made this movie when we were 23 years old as a senior thesis. It was a 3 man crew making everything happen
Carlos Ferrer, my friend, spent ten years on this film. He wrote, directed, shot, wrote the score and did all the cgi on his own. Which is unheard of.
So put that into context when you watch it.
While it might have quiet, slow times (I'll agree) but we did what many wish they could do.
Whether you hate it or like it. Realize that it was a crew of three and a director that literally did everything that usually takes a actual film crew to make.
For the haters. Get over yourselves.
We made this movie when we were 23 years old as a senior thesis. It was a 3 man crew making everything happen
Carlos Ferrer, my friend, spent ten years on this film. He wrote, directed, shot, wrote the score and did all the cgi on his own. Which is unheard of.
So put that into context when you watch it.
While it might have quiet, slow times (I'll agree) but we did what many wish they could do.
Whether you hate it or like it. Realize that it was a crew of three and a director that literally did everything that usually takes a actual film crew to make.
Was drawn into seeing 'Retina' with a cool poster/cover, a very intriguing and creative premise (one of the most innovative for any film seen recently) and as someone with a general appreciation for the genre. That it was low-budget, which from frequent personal experience is rarely a good sign due to that there are so many poor ones out there, made me though apprehensive.
'Retina' is a film it doesn't do enough with its potential (although there are far bigger wastes of potential in film) and could have been much better, can't say that it is a great film because it isn't. It is not a terrible film though, as far as recent low-budget film viewings go it's lacklustre but with good things. It certainly could have been far worse, considering the large number of films seen recently being mediocre at best and irredeemably terrible at worst.
Lets start with the positives. The scenery is atmospheric and spooky and 'Retina' is surprisingly well shot and easy on the eye, was expecting a cheap looking film and to me that wasn't the case here.
Found that the acting was not bad, while not award-worthy it was not amateurish and it seemed like the actors were trying to engage.
Also that there were a few nice moments that intrigued and there was some suspense and unsettlement, the first portion is promising.
The suspense and unsettlement doesn't come consistently however, with the second half having very little if any of either. What stops them from being frequent and stronger is an at times deadly dull pace with too many overlong scenes of little going on, not all necessary either and there for padding mainly, and also a structure that is not as cohesive or clear as it could have been.
'Retina's' idea was great but the content is nowhere near enough for a feature film. It feels more like a short film over-stretched. The over-stretched sense is present too in a deliberately sparse but rushed-first-draft-stage script. With a pace and structure that fails to compel it is very difficult to ignore.
Characters have very little to them, while the editing is careless at times, the direction shows little personality or atmosphere, the sound is random and obvious and the music is more monotonous than ominous.
Overall, lacklustre. 4/10 Bethany Cox
'Retina' is a film it doesn't do enough with its potential (although there are far bigger wastes of potential in film) and could have been much better, can't say that it is a great film because it isn't. It is not a terrible film though, as far as recent low-budget film viewings go it's lacklustre but with good things. It certainly could have been far worse, considering the large number of films seen recently being mediocre at best and irredeemably terrible at worst.
Lets start with the positives. The scenery is atmospheric and spooky and 'Retina' is surprisingly well shot and easy on the eye, was expecting a cheap looking film and to me that wasn't the case here.
Found that the acting was not bad, while not award-worthy it was not amateurish and it seemed like the actors were trying to engage.
Also that there were a few nice moments that intrigued and there was some suspense and unsettlement, the first portion is promising.
The suspense and unsettlement doesn't come consistently however, with the second half having very little if any of either. What stops them from being frequent and stronger is an at times deadly dull pace with too many overlong scenes of little going on, not all necessary either and there for padding mainly, and also a structure that is not as cohesive or clear as it could have been.
'Retina's' idea was great but the content is nowhere near enough for a feature film. It feels more like a short film over-stretched. The over-stretched sense is present too in a deliberately sparse but rushed-first-draft-stage script. With a pace and structure that fails to compel it is very difficult to ignore.
Characters have very little to them, while the editing is careless at times, the direction shows little personality or atmosphere, the sound is random and obvious and the music is more monotonous than ominous.
Overall, lacklustre. 4/10 Bethany Cox
The plot is quite nice, but there are too many quiet minutes in this movie for me to enjoy it.
People do stuff without speaking to each other, like pulling a gun on someone or getting shot and saying nothing.
Which is a shame cuz this is actually an action/conspiracy movie that could be much more. but I found it boring.
For this reason I don't recommend this movie to average joe's (like me). if you don't like to watch movies where 10 minutes pass and nothing is said, and you are used to Hollywood movies, this one isn't for you.
5/10 since the story is ok
For this reason I don't recommend this movie to average joe's (like me). if you don't like to watch movies where 10 minutes pass and nothing is said, and you are used to Hollywood movies, this one isn't for you.
5/10 since the story is ok
The Director seemed to think looooong drawn out senseless scenes would be interesting or he just needed filler for a BORING story. Very irritating dream sequences. The acting was horrendous and The main actor/character had absolutely no chemistry. I felt nothing for her at all. I think all the high scores here are definitely from people who had some connection to the movie. I fast forwarded through most of it. A couple of stops for plot points and understood the movie. Basically 10 min. of story and the rest just boring filler.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesBefore starring in Retina, Gary Swanson appeared in films like Vice Squad and The Bone Collector, starring Denzel Washington.
- GaffesThe newspaper headlines that summarize the aftermath at the end are spelled correctly. But there are some misspelled words in the fine print that are difficult to spot, such as "alchohol", "consistantly", "affectivness", "any wrong doing", etc.
- Crédits fousThe credits include an unusual job title: "Production Assisted by ... Joshua Jenks and Jared Slade Goldman"
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 41 280 $US
- Durée
- 1h 27min(87 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant