NOTE IMDb
1,6/10
8,6 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueTwo neurology students create a telepathy experiment together to visualize a murderer, who recently knifed another student.Two neurology students create a telepathy experiment together to visualize a murderer, who recently knifed another student.Two neurology students create a telepathy experiment together to visualize a murderer, who recently knifed another student.
Avis à la une
This "movie" is the worst thing ever. And the only reason I put the word movie in quotation marks is because I barely consider it a movie. I honestly think it's just a slideshow of random clips with "characters" on a cheap set.
I've only seen the movie once and I don't remember anything, which shows how boring and unoriginal this must really be. It's also known that the creator of this movie created a LOT of IMDb accounts to write good reviews and give it 10 stars, just look at the ratings! 88% of people gave it a perfect 10/10. Every time someone gives it a 1 - 2 star rating, the creator makes another 25 accounts to give it a 10 star rating.
I've only seen the movie once and I don't remember anything, which shows how boring and unoriginal this must really be. It's also known that the creator of this movie created a LOT of IMDb accounts to write good reviews and give it 10 stars, just look at the ratings! 88% of people gave it a perfect 10/10. Every time someone gives it a 1 - 2 star rating, the creator makes another 25 accounts to give it a 10 star rating.
Just... HORRIBLE! Why was this made? Where did the 5,000,000 dollar budget go? Why did the creator make thousands of fake IMDb accounts and give it 10 stars? He should be punished. Punished for falsely voting, and punished for making such a shitty movie. I do not know how to describe this movie. I went to a random word generator for that. (No joke) This film was horrible. The sound design, the sets, the music, the camera-work. It's all just horrible! How was this shot on 35 millimeter film? It looks horrible. It is a disgrace to films! Why was it made is the last question I have, and it is also my last argument. This film was literally burned by cinemas, because it was cheaper than sending it back to the creators. The only known evidence is the DVDs of this monstrosity. Destroy the DVDs if you have them. Please. For me and for the world.
In the pantheon of bad movies there are some that stand out due to notoriety like "Plan 9 From Outer Space", cult favorites like "The Room" or just plain WTF like "Actium Maximus: War of the Alien Dinosaurs". These, or "Grade Z" movies are typically considered "so bad they're good" meaning you can enjoy them unironically because they transcend badness and come out the other end as something you need to see.
Make no mistake, this is not one of those movies. After Last Season is bad. Really bad. The acting is bad. The dialogue is bad. The sets are bad. The sound is bad. There is literally nothing good about it. And how this cost $5 million I will never know.
The story makes no sense. I've watched it twice now and I'm still not getting the whole point of... anything. Things just happen. People speak like aliens who know English but can't speak it properly to save their lives.
The sets are half the time just cardboard and sheets of paper. I'm not kidding. The MRI at the start? A bunch of cardboard boxes and paper. The MRI pictures on the wall? Just a bunch of printouts taped up. Doors are covered in paper for unknown reasons. Signs that are obviously just taped to the wall indicate business names. This was obviously shot in a house and in some warehouse somewhere but there are ways make this not quite so obvious.
It's not even enjoyable as a bad movie because it's just so inept without the putrid charm that "The Room" or "Birdemic: Shock and Horror" has.
Give this one a pass. You'll thank me later.
Make no mistake, this is not one of those movies. After Last Season is bad. Really bad. The acting is bad. The dialogue is bad. The sets are bad. The sound is bad. There is literally nothing good about it. And how this cost $5 million I will never know.
The story makes no sense. I've watched it twice now and I'm still not getting the whole point of... anything. Things just happen. People speak like aliens who know English but can't speak it properly to save their lives.
The sets are half the time just cardboard and sheets of paper. I'm not kidding. The MRI at the start? A bunch of cardboard boxes and paper. The MRI pictures on the wall? Just a bunch of printouts taped up. Doors are covered in paper for unknown reasons. Signs that are obviously just taped to the wall indicate business names. This was obviously shot in a house and in some warehouse somewhere but there are ways make this not quite so obvious.
It's not even enjoyable as a bad movie because it's just so inept without the putrid charm that "The Room" or "Birdemic: Shock and Horror" has.
Give this one a pass. You'll thank me later.
In this review I am not going to talk about the film at all really but rather the pathetic attempts by the team to cover up this frankly sh1t film.
Now before anyone complains, let it be known that I love film as an art-form and even when I think the film is 'bad', if the team has at least worked hard and clearly tried their hardest I can normally respect them. However, writing fake reviews to trick people into watching is NOT ACCEPTABLE! I'm not going to pretend I can see inside the directors head but all I know is that something is wrong with these scores...
Votes Percentage Rating 5833 89.1% 10 45 0.7% 9 22 0.3% 8 18 0.3% 7 12 0.2% 6 8 0.1% 5 7 0.1% 4 10 0.2% 3 53 0.8% 2 537 8.2% 1
WOW!Over 89% on 10 / 10, must be a masterpiece right, seriously guys just watch the trailer and see if you can spot a problem in this. The other problem that should be immediately clear is how the next highest percentage is 8.2 at 1... pretty big split no, I don't think I've ever seen one that large in fact like EVER!
I'm sick of even thinking about this sh1t right now. I know you might be thinking "but Max what sucked about the film" so i'll answer...
Everying!!! Nuff said. If you want to know the specific problems please read someone else's review, except filter by worst first as then you wont get Mr. Reigon and his crew attempting to glorify this crock of sh1t
One final bit of trivia for you, did you know that the budget of this film was $5,000,000 and that only $30,000 of it was actually spent on the film, with the other $4,970,000 all going into CGI. Huh interesting but one thing Mr. Reigon...
3D modeling software does not attribute to $4,970,000! 'Blender' alone is free and while I'm sure the software you use is better than that, it may interest you to know that the software Disney uses is but a fraction of that (e.g. Autodesk Maya = little over $1,400 for industry level animation).
Please play this clip of $4,000,000+ animation www.you tube.com/watch?v=UqIewqGUdOM After last season funniest scene {sorry for bad quality, best I could find quickly}
I'm sorry Mr. Reigon could you attempt to I don't know, try, in the future. To everyone else, stop watching this film it is probably an embezzlement scam and you are giving this... 'individual' money.
Now before anyone complains, let it be known that I love film as an art-form and even when I think the film is 'bad', if the team has at least worked hard and clearly tried their hardest I can normally respect them. However, writing fake reviews to trick people into watching is NOT ACCEPTABLE! I'm not going to pretend I can see inside the directors head but all I know is that something is wrong with these scores...
Votes Percentage Rating 5833 89.1% 10 45 0.7% 9 22 0.3% 8 18 0.3% 7 12 0.2% 6 8 0.1% 5 7 0.1% 4 10 0.2% 3 53 0.8% 2 537 8.2% 1
WOW!Over 89% on 10 / 10, must be a masterpiece right, seriously guys just watch the trailer and see if you can spot a problem in this. The other problem that should be immediately clear is how the next highest percentage is 8.2 at 1... pretty big split no, I don't think I've ever seen one that large in fact like EVER!
I'm sick of even thinking about this sh1t right now. I know you might be thinking "but Max what sucked about the film" so i'll answer...
Everying!!! Nuff said. If you want to know the specific problems please read someone else's review, except filter by worst first as then you wont get Mr. Reigon and his crew attempting to glorify this crock of sh1t
One final bit of trivia for you, did you know that the budget of this film was $5,000,000 and that only $30,000 of it was actually spent on the film, with the other $4,970,000 all going into CGI. Huh interesting but one thing Mr. Reigon...
3D modeling software does not attribute to $4,970,000! 'Blender' alone is free and while I'm sure the software you use is better than that, it may interest you to know that the software Disney uses is but a fraction of that (e.g. Autodesk Maya = little over $1,400 for industry level animation).
Please play this clip of $4,000,000+ animation www.you tube.com/watch?v=UqIewqGUdOM After last season funniest scene {sorry for bad quality, best I could find quickly}
I'm sorry Mr. Reigon could you attempt to I don't know, try, in the future. To everyone else, stop watching this film it is probably an embezzlement scam and you are giving this... 'individual' money.
This is the movie that high school students watch to see all the dreadfully horrendous things that could happen in their drama videos. Extremely bad lighting which casts deep shadows everywhere, there is no concept of back lighting. The audio is poor with the sound being echoed and blurred making it very difficult to hear the actors. White paper is constantly used in props to make extremely unrealistic MRI Scanners, computers, half formed bedrooms and offices. Real bedrooms with fancy ceiling lights are used as clinic rooms. Industrial basements used in the film are half covered showing drain pipes, dirty brick walls and filthy floors with office furniture consisting of 2 deck chairs. The acting is so static you would think that they were talking statues. I expected the actors to move rather than be glued in place. The editing of this film is so bad that every edit makes you believe you are in a different scene. The editing makes you feel that you are randomly jumping about in time in 5 second intervals. In conclusion this film is absolute garbage and the rating has definitely been rigged.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe film was only released in four cities. After its theatrical run, the film's distributor called each theatre individually and told them to burn the prints because it was cheaper than sending them back.
- GaffesWhen Matthew gives Sarah the microchips, a suitcase is on the table. The next shot the suitcase has disappeared.
- Citations
Matthew Andrews: So, picture a flat surface. Out of the surface, one letter rises.
Sarah Austin: From the alphabet?
Matthew Andrews: Yes.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Atop the Fourth Wall: Plan 9 from Outer Space: 30 Years Later #1 (2013)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is After Last Season?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 5 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée
- 1h 33min(93 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant