NOTE IMDb
1,6/10
8,6 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueTwo neurology students create a telepathy experiment together to visualize a murderer, who recently knifed another student.Two neurology students create a telepathy experiment together to visualize a murderer, who recently knifed another student.Two neurology students create a telepathy experiment together to visualize a murderer, who recently knifed another student.
Avis à la une
This is movie is the worse movie I have ever seen my whole life. Even 12 year old can make a film more compelling than this. Thousands of YouTube videos has more entertainment value than this atrocity AND THOSE VIDEOS ARE BUDGET FREE.
The entire premise is about two students trying to solve a murder of their fellow colleague.
It has the worst acting I have ever seen. I don't even know why this movie has a 6/10 on IMDb. The movie tries so hard to be artsy. with its terrible editing.
The music makes my ears bleeds. It has a generic piano tune that is so generic, it makes my wheat bread taste spicier than cayenne peppers.
The sets are made out of cardboard. There is one particular scene that involves a poor imitation of a CT Scan. Why couldn't the director rent out and actual hospital?
Do not watch this movie its not even entertaining in the least bit. Instead, watch Tommy Wiseau's "The Room" and you'll come out more satisfied and complete than this atrocity.
The entire premise is about two students trying to solve a murder of their fellow colleague.
It has the worst acting I have ever seen. I don't even know why this movie has a 6/10 on IMDb. The movie tries so hard to be artsy. with its terrible editing.
The music makes my ears bleeds. It has a generic piano tune that is so generic, it makes my wheat bread taste spicier than cayenne peppers.
The sets are made out of cardboard. There is one particular scene that involves a poor imitation of a CT Scan. Why couldn't the director rent out and actual hospital?
Do not watch this movie its not even entertaining in the least bit. Instead, watch Tommy Wiseau's "The Room" and you'll come out more satisfied and complete than this atrocity.
This thing makes The Room look like Kenneth Branagh's Henry V by comparison. It looks like it was made by a blind director working with a blind cinematographer and a blind lighting man filming people who never read a script and are just improvising their parts without being told what the other people are doing in the film, scored by a deaf composer. Set design by a crew of kindergartners using the construction paper, tape, glue, and markers left over from recess.
I have no idea how they knew enough about film making to turn the camera on, but that appears to have been the extent of their knowledge.
I have no idea how they knew enough about film making to turn the camera on, but that appears to have been the extent of their knowledge.
i hate this movie. lighting is terrible, sets are terrible, the acting is terrible, everything is terrible.
this movie had a budget of 5 million dollars, with that money a decent director could have made a good low budget, instead this guy has spent all the money on cardboard and terrible animation.
the actors look like someone is pointing a live firearm at them off set. the production design is terrible, you can see the seams of the set. the editing jumps around not really doing anything to further the. a plot by the way i still to this day i don't understand. if i could give it something it looks like the maker of this film tried, and sort of cared about this film, but it doesn't look like he knows anything about filmmaking
don't see this movie.
this movie had a budget of 5 million dollars, with that money a decent director could have made a good low budget, instead this guy has spent all the money on cardboard and terrible animation.
the actors look like someone is pointing a live firearm at them off set. the production design is terrible, you can see the seams of the set. the editing jumps around not really doing anything to further the. a plot by the way i still to this day i don't understand. if i could give it something it looks like the maker of this film tried, and sort of cared about this film, but it doesn't look like he knows anything about filmmaking
don't see this movie.
In this review I am not going to talk about the film at all really but rather the pathetic attempts by the team to cover up this frankly sh1t film.
Now before anyone complains, let it be known that I love film as an art-form and even when I think the film is 'bad', if the team has at least worked hard and clearly tried their hardest I can normally respect them. However, writing fake reviews to trick people into watching is NOT ACCEPTABLE! I'm not going to pretend I can see inside the directors head but all I know is that something is wrong with these scores...
Votes Percentage Rating 5833 89.1% 10 45 0.7% 9 22 0.3% 8 18 0.3% 7 12 0.2% 6 8 0.1% 5 7 0.1% 4 10 0.2% 3 53 0.8% 2 537 8.2% 1
WOW!Over 89% on 10 / 10, must be a masterpiece right, seriously guys just watch the trailer and see if you can spot a problem in this. The other problem that should be immediately clear is how the next highest percentage is 8.2 at 1... pretty big split no, I don't think I've ever seen one that large in fact like EVER!
I'm sick of even thinking about this sh1t right now. I know you might be thinking "but Max what sucked about the film" so i'll answer...
Everying!!! Nuff said. If you want to know the specific problems please read someone else's review, except filter by worst first as then you wont get Mr. Reigon and his crew attempting to glorify this crock of sh1t
One final bit of trivia for you, did you know that the budget of this film was $5,000,000 and that only $30,000 of it was actually spent on the film, with the other $4,970,000 all going into CGI. Huh interesting but one thing Mr. Reigon...
3D modeling software does not attribute to $4,970,000! 'Blender' alone is free and while I'm sure the software you use is better than that, it may interest you to know that the software Disney uses is but a fraction of that (e.g. Autodesk Maya = little over $1,400 for industry level animation).
Please play this clip of $4,000,000+ animation www.you tube.com/watch?v=UqIewqGUdOM After last season funniest scene {sorry for bad quality, best I could find quickly}
I'm sorry Mr. Reigon could you attempt to I don't know, try, in the future. To everyone else, stop watching this film it is probably an embezzlement scam and you are giving this... 'individual' money.
Now before anyone complains, let it be known that I love film as an art-form and even when I think the film is 'bad', if the team has at least worked hard and clearly tried their hardest I can normally respect them. However, writing fake reviews to trick people into watching is NOT ACCEPTABLE! I'm not going to pretend I can see inside the directors head but all I know is that something is wrong with these scores...
Votes Percentage Rating 5833 89.1% 10 45 0.7% 9 22 0.3% 8 18 0.3% 7 12 0.2% 6 8 0.1% 5 7 0.1% 4 10 0.2% 3 53 0.8% 2 537 8.2% 1
WOW!Over 89% on 10 / 10, must be a masterpiece right, seriously guys just watch the trailer and see if you can spot a problem in this. The other problem that should be immediately clear is how the next highest percentage is 8.2 at 1... pretty big split no, I don't think I've ever seen one that large in fact like EVER!
I'm sick of even thinking about this sh1t right now. I know you might be thinking "but Max what sucked about the film" so i'll answer...
Everying!!! Nuff said. If you want to know the specific problems please read someone else's review, except filter by worst first as then you wont get Mr. Reigon and his crew attempting to glorify this crock of sh1t
One final bit of trivia for you, did you know that the budget of this film was $5,000,000 and that only $30,000 of it was actually spent on the film, with the other $4,970,000 all going into CGI. Huh interesting but one thing Mr. Reigon...
3D modeling software does not attribute to $4,970,000! 'Blender' alone is free and while I'm sure the software you use is better than that, it may interest you to know that the software Disney uses is but a fraction of that (e.g. Autodesk Maya = little over $1,400 for industry level animation).
Please play this clip of $4,000,000+ animation www.you tube.com/watch?v=UqIewqGUdOM After last season funniest scene {sorry for bad quality, best I could find quickly}
I'm sorry Mr. Reigon could you attempt to I don't know, try, in the future. To everyone else, stop watching this film it is probably an embezzlement scam and you are giving this... 'individual' money.
I bought this film after seeing the fake reviews from the director biggest mistake of my life. I paid money to see this pile of drek thinking I was going to see a good movie or at least a passable one but no what I got was the nightmare hell spawn known as after last season. Where to start with this "film" and I use that term lightly. So the lighting and editing are terrible,the acting is abysmal, and the sets are all made out of cardboard. I'd be OK with this if it had a small budget or if this movie was old but none of those are true it was released in 2009, and it has a budget of five million dollars, just think about it someone paid five million dollars to make this pile of drek that's more then ill ever own in my life and it was used to make a crappy film that looks worse then than films I made with my friends when I was ten unacceptable. So if you see a positive review on this film it's just the director trying to make his crap film look good.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe film was only released in four cities. After its theatrical run, the film's distributor called each theatre individually and told them to burn the prints because it was cheaper than sending them back.
- GaffesWhen Matthew gives Sarah the microchips, a suitcase is on the table. The next shot the suitcase has disappeared.
- Citations
Matthew Andrews: So, picture a flat surface. Out of the surface, one letter rises.
Sarah Austin: From the alphabet?
Matthew Andrews: Yes.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Atop the Fourth Wall: Plan 9 from Outer Space: 30 Years Later #1 (2013)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is After Last Season?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 5 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée1 heure 33 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant