NOTE IMDb
6,4/10
16 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueIn a locked down train station, a homicide detective conducts an interview with a tormented monkey.In a locked down train station, a homicide detective conducts an interview with a tormented monkey.In a locked down train station, a homicide detective conducts an interview with a tormented monkey.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
I loved this short film. It is very creative. Maybe I am reading too much into things, but I see this film as a satire on the hackneyed state of the English language. Lynch is making fun of the way many people speak. He is also indirectly criticizing the way many screenwriters write. His basic premise: Even monkeys can be trained to speak movie dialogue, because the dialogue in so many films is filled with cliches.
I love every minute out of that short. Why? Let me explain.
It gives us a simple story, a cop who questions a bad guy who did something bad, seems familiar? That's because it's meant to be like that! Lynch is exposing that cliche dialogue scene, which is used in every crime movie. This quick scene uses absurd to critique the language of cinema and give us some good laughs.
Of course there are people who don't like his humor, but I'd heard they've been seen with chickens.
Of course there are people who don't like his humor, but I'd heard they've been seen with chickens.
This short film is incredibly Lynchian. It's purely a signature of style, and I mean that in the most positive way possible. However, I can't help but wonder, if this short came from anyone else who lacked the renown which Lynch has, would it be viewed as anything more than a peculiar piece that you pass by after five minutes? It's good in its eerie, dream-like quality, truly, but I'm torn as to whether this is noteworthy solely because of what it is in style or simply because of who made it--content aside. I suppose I'm at a stalemate of neutrality on this one. Draw your own conclusions, and I hope you enjoy, either way!
It's Lynch at his silliest. If anything, this is the opposite of pretentiousness. You can't help but laugh at the ridiculous nature of what's unfolding in front of you. Lynch, as a detective, interrogating a suspect, a talking Monkey. All of the dialogue is purposefully delivered with cliche gusto. It's short, it's sweet, and it even has a song at the end. There's no much to digest and you're not going to ask what it's all about when it's over. Just enjoy the ride- for Lynch has graced us with another surreal work of (art).
Big David Lynch fan. Most of the time i dont understand a thing of what is going in his movies, but still find myself entertained. I often wonder if the weirdest scenes have a point or if he doesnt care. Nevertheless, its always nice and sometimes hilarious to watch these things. What did Jack do has all of that. Certainly, it isnt a waist of time. to be honest, i Think most of us could use a little weirdness, in todays market of satiretegninger superhelt movies and other uninspiring movie media.
As for the movie itself, i have absolutely nothing to add, except the monkey is kind of cute.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe waitress who brings Jack and the detective coffee is played by David Lynch's wife, Emily Stofle.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Clique: Daniel Andreyev, Patrick-Pierre Garcia (2020)
- Bandes originalesTrue Love's Flame
by David Lynch and Dean Hurley
Performed by Jack Cruz
Publishing by Bobkind Music & Team Hurley
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Что сделал Джек?
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée17 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was What Did Jack Do? (2017) officially released in India in English?
Répondre