81 commentaires
Eugene Bell (Zach Cregger) and Tucker Cleigh (Trevor Moore) have been best friends since they were children. Tucker has always had sexual attraction for women having his life driven by sex while Eugene and his sweetheart Cindi Whitehall (Raquel Alessi) do not have sexual intercourse waiting for their marriage. However on the day of their prom, Cindi decides that they should have sex. After the prom, they go to a party and Tucker convinces the nervous Eugene to drink a couple of drinks. Eugene is not used to drink and becomes dizzy, falling in the basement. Four years later, Eugene awakens from a coma and finds that Tucker is the only one that waited for him, since his father traveled abroad and his girlfriend has moved to another city. Further, Tucker is living with the schoolmate Candace (Molly Stanton) and he has atrophy of his muscles and incontinence. Soon they discover that Cindi is the centerfold of the March edition of Playboy magazine and she will be at Hugh Hefner's mansion in the anniversary party. Tucker has a serious situation with Candance and he needs to flee from her brother, who is a fireman. He takes Eugene with him and drives to the mansion to meet Cindi in a road trip full of incidents and confusions.
"Miss March" is among the most moronic and brainless films ever produced and certainly hated by professional critics. The story is politically incorrect since the very beginning. However if the viewer shutdown his brain and watch the movie, he or she will certainly laugh a lot. My vote is six.
Title (Brazil): "Miss Março: A Garota da Capa" ("Miss March: The Girl on the Cover")
"Miss March" is among the most moronic and brainless films ever produced and certainly hated by professional critics. The story is politically incorrect since the very beginning. However if the viewer shutdown his brain and watch the movie, he or she will certainly laugh a lot. My vote is six.
Title (Brazil): "Miss Março: A Garota da Capa" ("Miss March: The Girl on the Cover")
- claudio_carvalho
- 21 août 2015
- Permalien
I don't know why they didn't add Timmy and other guys to the casting/scripting of this movie, but I'm sure hoping they will if they should ever create another one.
There were some very good laughs, but overall it felt kinda like 90's movie with Tom and Jerry like jokes(Which doesn't have to be a bad thing when well executed).
Also they were going WAY too much for the simple Hollywood recipe and moral story.
Whitest Kids You Know rocks 100% :P I sure can't wait to see new stuff from them.
...maybe my hopes were just too high for this one...
There were some very good laughs, but overall it felt kinda like 90's movie with Tom and Jerry like jokes(Which doesn't have to be a bad thing when well executed).
Also they were going WAY too much for the simple Hollywood recipe and moral story.
Whitest Kids You Know rocks 100% :P I sure can't wait to see new stuff from them.
...maybe my hopes were just too high for this one...
I'd give this a 2 or 3 excepting that is has 5 or 6 absolutely laugh out loud and that's more than most movies. None of this is rocket science: two guys head for the Playboy Mansion to find an ex-girlfriend and have adventures on the way. It's all very silly indeed - but if you imagine you're aged 12 - 14 or are 12 - 14 then this is a not bad guilty pleasure. Awful in places, and in others a huge chuckle fest it really is not anyone's idea of a great movie... but darn, the laugh out loud moments are some of the funniest I've seen all year... and had been laughing when i remembered them afterward....
- intelearts
- 14 juil. 2009
- Permalien
I will not dignify this film with comments on the plot.. the characters.. the story line for this would be giving it more than it deserves.
Simply put this is one of those movies that you watch because its kind of like a car accident, you know you shouldn't be looking but you can't look away. The acting is so incredibly bad that you actually feel pity and shame for the actors who appear it in it.
It's a bad bad disease, please only watch this film if you watching it for the "it's so bad its good" factor.
Woeful.. awful... absolutely embarrassing for every single person involved. If I served the crew lunch I would want my name left off the credits in fear that this disaster would somehow follow me.
Simply put this is one of those movies that you watch because its kind of like a car accident, you know you shouldn't be looking but you can't look away. The acting is so incredibly bad that you actually feel pity and shame for the actors who appear it in it.
It's a bad bad disease, please only watch this film if you watching it for the "it's so bad its good" factor.
Woeful.. awful... absolutely embarrassing for every single person involved. If I served the crew lunch I would want my name left off the credits in fear that this disaster would somehow follow me.
- zildjianboy
- 31 oct. 2009
- Permalien
- Smells_Like_Cheese
- 12 juin 2010
- Permalien
I think that this movie is a perfect example of the weaknesses of IMDb. You get too many people of the wrong mindset reviewing this movie. Being a huge fan of Youtube's "The Whitest Kids U' Know", I found the humour in this movie spot on. It is MEANT to be completely over the top (with some real cringy bits). Its just what they do, and to be honest, not many could do it better.
Yes, this film may not deserve a reputation for anything other than just another Teen movie, but in my books its darn good, and more than anything else, it made me feel a lot happier inside. Is that a bad thing?
Basically, if you are someone who is going to watch this movie without being able to handle sick, crude jokes, then why review it? it isn't for you. That's quite simple.
So in the words of Tucker himself, I would rate this film "A perfect seven".
Yes, this film may not deserve a reputation for anything other than just another Teen movie, but in my books its darn good, and more than anything else, it made me feel a lot happier inside. Is that a bad thing?
Basically, if you are someone who is going to watch this movie without being able to handle sick, crude jokes, then why review it? it isn't for you. That's quite simple.
So in the words of Tucker himself, I would rate this film "A perfect seven".
Whoever went to see this movie and thought: " Hey...it's funny...I really enjoyed this one". Must have been watching Road Trip...because this movie was the stupidest, dumbest and most ridiculous movie I have seen in years. I thought Max Payne was bad...Max Payne was Ben-Hur compared to this movie. The worst acting by both main characters, even worse by the secondary ones(the crazy epileptic gf,crazy firefighter,lesbian Russians,Hugh Hefner,the bouncer with glasses(he should stop doing movies)). I mean will you people stop giving all of these movies 5 stars up here. Fired up was a way better movie than this! And if the directors think we didn't notice a little bit amateur camera work around the motel scenes they are mistaken! Basically this movie sucked! Badly...Meet the Spartans was funnier, Scary Movie 3 was better. Date movie was more appealing than Miss March!
Tucker Cleigh (Trevor Moore) is a loudmouth sex-crazed idiot. Eugene Bell (Zach Cregger) is his straight laced best friend. Cindi Whitehall (Raquel Alessi) is Eugene's girlfriend. They decided to save themselves but Cindi wants to take it to the next level. He promises to have sex on prom night. Then at the prom after party, he falls down a flight of stairs. He wakes up after a 4 year coma when Tucker hit him with a baseball bat. Cindy is the new Playboy centerfold. They take a cross country trip to the Playboy mansion to win her back.
The biggest problem is that the two leads who also co-wrote and co-directed this movie are completely lacking in big screen charisma. It doesn't help that they look like 30 year olds when their characters are in high school. Their age fits a little better after the coma. However the lack of charisma never changes. As for the crude humor, it has its moments. They are definitely pushing the envelope, but everything in between is dreadfully boring.
The biggest problem is that the two leads who also co-wrote and co-directed this movie are completely lacking in big screen charisma. It doesn't help that they look like 30 year olds when their characters are in high school. Their age fits a little better after the coma. However the lack of charisma never changes. As for the crude humor, it has its moments. They are definitely pushing the envelope, but everything in between is dreadfully boring.
- SnoopyStyle
- 25 mars 2014
- Permalien
Critics tended to pan this movie. While I'll admit that the movie tended to lean towards gross and raunchy humor at times (especially the sex scenes, the "flasher" scenes, and the lesbian car driver characters) and that it didn't seem to be fit for all tastes or aiming for being a classic, I still enjoyed the movie and thought it was truly hilarious. What else can you expect from a movie that centers around Playboy magazine? My favorite scenes were with Molly Stanton chasing after the best friend after, during a pole dance scene, he instigated her into having a seizure with strobe lights and tried to pry her off of him by stabbing her in the face with a fork. Her chasing after him and getting the fire department to do the same were, in my opinion, the funniest scenes. I also liked the road trip scenes and Tucker's meeting with Hugh Heffner. You might like this movie. It really depends on your taste and "material threshold." Give it a try if you're in the right mood.
** 1/2 out of ****
** 1/2 out of ****
Seems that a lot of people really don't like this movie. I don't understand what they wanted out of it or expected but I expected a dumb, raunchy comedy and that's exactly what I got. This movie is no more raunchy than many other teen comedies made around the same time and it actually made me laugh quite a bit. I may be slightly biased because I've been a huge fan of WKUK for a while and really wanted this movie to succeed. I know it's nothing to write home about but if you're in the mood to just laugh at some raunchy comedy then this is a great pick. 7/10.
- cstover-28468
- 25 avr. 2021
- Permalien
This movie had potential to be a decent romantic comedy but too many poop jokes just puts it in the "Crass" category.
It was a pathetic attempt to shock the audience with its crudity.
It does have a few moments though. The protagonist Zach, seems to have potential to do better roles.He is the best part of the movie, but unfortunately doe to the poop jokes centered around him, the audience is unable to sympathise with him.
Trevor Moore has also done a decent job of playing the insensitive friend. What is really sad is that the director had come close to pulling off a good movie, but loses the audience due to a few really crass sequences, which were really unnecessary.
It was a pathetic attempt to shock the audience with its crudity.
It does have a few moments though. The protagonist Zach, seems to have potential to do better roles.He is the best part of the movie, but unfortunately doe to the poop jokes centered around him, the audience is unable to sympathise with him.
Trevor Moore has also done a decent job of playing the insensitive friend. What is really sad is that the director had come close to pulling off a good movie, but loses the audience due to a few really crass sequences, which were really unnecessary.
There are some humorous moments in this movie, but, not enough to overcome how truly horrible it really is. In between the humorous moments is a stupid movie with very bad acting and scenes that look like they were added just to make the movie longer. I'm pretty sure this movie was written in someone's dorm room while they were failing out of everything. How it became a movie is astonishing, but, I suppose Zach Creggor and Trevor Moore deserve credit for selling it to someone. I wish I had the dollar back it cost me to rent it and the gas it took me to get to the redbox. If you must watch it, I suggest you surf the internet or play a game at the same time to help pass the time.
- tommywahlman
- 3 sept. 2009
- Permalien
- GirishGowda
- 27 mai 2010
- Permalien
Thank goodness I never saw this in the cinema - it was on TV the other night and I watched the first half with my sister, at which point we could no longer take anymore.
This is the kind of movie that is the opposite to everything I like about movies. It is crude and sexist, the main characters are absolutely unlikeable, it has several jokes that involve feces, there are homicidal firemen trying to run the main characters' car off the road even though they only have a beef with one of the two occupants - oh, and they can whip up firemen in OTHER states to do the same thing (seriously WHAT?).
The protagonist's friend is the most reprehensible person I've ever seen in a movie that wasn't portrayed as a villain. He wakes his friend up from a 4-year coma by hitting him in the face with a baseball bat. And then kidnaps him from his hospital room before he is rehabilitated, and much more.
The film might still have been saved, if not for the head-poundingly annoying acting of Trevor Moore. His relentless irritating talking is what ultimately made me turn this thing off. "Blah blah blah Playboy, blah blah blah blah blah boobs, blah blah blah Playboy." That's his character in a nutshell.
If you enjoy terrible films, by all means see this movie. But I don't think I can be friends with you.
This is the kind of movie that is the opposite to everything I like about movies. It is crude and sexist, the main characters are absolutely unlikeable, it has several jokes that involve feces, there are homicidal firemen trying to run the main characters' car off the road even though they only have a beef with one of the two occupants - oh, and they can whip up firemen in OTHER states to do the same thing (seriously WHAT?).
The protagonist's friend is the most reprehensible person I've ever seen in a movie that wasn't portrayed as a villain. He wakes his friend up from a 4-year coma by hitting him in the face with a baseball bat. And then kidnaps him from his hospital room before he is rehabilitated, and much more.
The film might still have been saved, if not for the head-poundingly annoying acting of Trevor Moore. His relentless irritating talking is what ultimately made me turn this thing off. "Blah blah blah Playboy, blah blah blah blah blah boobs, blah blah blah Playboy." That's his character in a nutshell.
If you enjoy terrible films, by all means see this movie. But I don't think I can be friends with you.
This isn't a bad movie at all. I love movies like Road Trip, EuroTrip, and Sex Drive. Not sure what the hate is about on this one.
I've been looking forward to seeing this film for a while, as I know the creators from Whitest Kids You Know, which is one of the best and funniest sketch comedies on at the moment, it is seriously brilliant and off the wall but not in an 'attempting to be python again' kind of way coming into miss march was a bit of a downer, its a film thats more commercially acceptable, but really its just another twist on the 'road trip' genre, it has pretty interesting jokes but nothing really new Definitely worth a watch, but road trip, or American pie have done the same thing so much better, but really, check out whitest kids you know, same guys but absolutely brilliant
- fluffy_reaper
- 7 juin 2009
- Permalien
- Robert_duder
- 29 déc. 2010
- Permalien
- danomychowski
- 15 mars 2009
- Permalien
- Pumpkin_Man
- 11 sept. 2009
- Permalien
How did this movie get made? Why did High Hefner associate himself with this collection of garbage.
This was more a parody of a movie than an actual movie. A collection of targets to offend and very little to redeem it.
Look away! Look away! The gross-out sequences were too gross.
The unrated version had nothing of value and the extras were not worth including.
I fail to see why anybody likes this movie at all.
Bad script, bad acting.
Bad, bad, bad.
This was more a parody of a movie than an actual movie. A collection of targets to offend and very little to redeem it.
Look away! Look away! The gross-out sequences were too gross.
The unrated version had nothing of value and the extras were not worth including.
I fail to see why anybody likes this movie at all.
Bad script, bad acting.
Bad, bad, bad.
- david_grills
- 19 juin 2010
- Permalien
It's been a long time since I've written an IMDb review but I feel I would be doing movie fans--and humanity--a disservice by not taking a few moments to describe how painful this movie is. It's only slight better than "Son Of The Mask" which I rank as my worst movie of all-time. Believe me...use the 90 minutes to call your grandmother or that old friend you keep putting off because you're "too busy"...or do some exercise...or clean up your garage. ANYTHING but sit on the couch and corrupt your humour glands with this filth.
I am not a prude by any means...I love any kind of smut and filth if it's done properly (i.e. American Pie; There's Something About Mary; etc)...but how this train wreck got produced is beyond me. That anybody in Hollywood in charge of writing the cheques for something like this could read the script and think "yeah, this deserves a budget of $XXXX!!!" makes me fear for the future of moviedom.
In the interest of fairness (what little this piece of trash deserves), I gave it a two instead of a one because I did chuckle--not a genuine LOL, but a guffaw--at least once in the movie and perhaps as many of three times. Certainly not more than that. And the saddest part is, the concept had the capacity to be a decent, poignant, road-trip movie with a decent script and some decent acting. But no, instead we are subjected to a 9-year-old-boy's masturbatory nightmare of degrading and scatological humour.
Avoid at all costs! Or better yet, jot down your own idea for a movie on your cocktail napkin next time you and your buddies are at the bar. No doubt somebody in Hollywood will write a big cheque for it.
I am not a prude by any means...I love any kind of smut and filth if it's done properly (i.e. American Pie; There's Something About Mary; etc)...but how this train wreck got produced is beyond me. That anybody in Hollywood in charge of writing the cheques for something like this could read the script and think "yeah, this deserves a budget of $XXXX!!!" makes me fear for the future of moviedom.
In the interest of fairness (what little this piece of trash deserves), I gave it a two instead of a one because I did chuckle--not a genuine LOL, but a guffaw--at least once in the movie and perhaps as many of three times. Certainly not more than that. And the saddest part is, the concept had the capacity to be a decent, poignant, road-trip movie with a decent script and some decent acting. But no, instead we are subjected to a 9-year-old-boy's masturbatory nightmare of degrading and scatological humour.
Avoid at all costs! Or better yet, jot down your own idea for a movie on your cocktail napkin next time you and your buddies are at the bar. No doubt somebody in Hollywood will write a big cheque for it.
- tombstone81
- 9 févr. 2010
- Permalien