Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueThe US is hit by a wave of nuclear attacks. Mayday receives a intergalactic distress call that leads her to Spacerock. Mayday's organs start to fail and her mother brings back her to Spacero... Tout lireThe US is hit by a wave of nuclear attacks. Mayday receives a intergalactic distress call that leads her to Spacerock. Mayday's organs start to fail and her mother brings back her to Spacerock to give to the aliens so they can save her.The US is hit by a wave of nuclear attacks. Mayday receives a intergalactic distress call that leads her to Spacerock. Mayday's organs start to fail and her mother brings back her to Spacerock to give to the aliens so they can save her.
- Réalisation
- Scénariste
- Stars
- Récompenses
- 103 victoires et 5 nominations au total
Avis à la une
I very seldom review movies on here, but this was actually so horrible that I had to warn others to pass it by and not waste their time watching it. I can see why it took years for this to come to light and then went straight to streaming when it finally did come out. The acting was horrible, the script and dialogue and the interaction between the actors looked forced and was horrible and the score was horrendous. The movie was set in an alternate 1980's, and it sure did a good job reminding me of a B movie that was actually filmed in the 80's, so they got that aspect correct. This movie should have stayed on the shelf. 1/10.
2.5 ⭐
Of course this is a B movie. At times it feels it's a few letters after that.
The movie is a bit confusing. It starts showing an alternate history in the 80's but it's so sloppy I sort of questioned if they were actually doing "alternate history", or if they just got their history very wrong. They never explain what's so different either. They're trying to say nuclear war happened, but it's very unclear what that affected. Where the nukes hit. Which should have been way clearer. Especially when you have your characters getting radiation sickness all the time. Having the big exposition dump done by bad child actors in a classroom was a really bad idea.
Even when it's not obviously confusing, characters do and say things that make no sense. Near the end, the movie adds some explanation that tries to explain away major issues. I say "tries" because it does a bad job and causes even more issues than it fixes.
This movie steals a lot of moments and lines from other movies. As a Sci-Fi fan, I noticed about 6 moments that were basically ripped right out of other movies. And no, it didn't feel like a tribute, it felt stolen. And in a bad cringe way. The bad acting just makes it worse. Not only that but it was really unnecessary to rip off those moments.
An example is the main girl is on a ham radio and interrupts a conversation. Then she does the exact line from Star Wars - the one where Han Solo is on the radio in the detention center on the Death Star. That scene here is UGLY!
A lot of those stolen moments were ugly. This movie ripped off so much, that it even copies itself at times. There are scenes of a kid that gets lost and someone finds their stuffed animal. That happens a few times. Different kids and stuffed animals.
Worst of all were the 80's TV show references. There's about 15 scenes where characters reference an 80's show. It was so excessive, that I worried that it would tie into the story somehow. Like a side effect of alien abduction would be that they referenced TV shows or something. The first time it happened makes sense, you're like OK, they're really trying to show that it's the 80's. Then next few times you're like OK, they're going overboard. But every time after that is extreme. Did the writer-director have memory problems?
If all the confusion, bad acting, and more wasn't bad enough, this movie does the "mix up all your scenes and do multiple timelines" thing.
Having multiple timelines and then mixing up your scenes haphazardly doesn't equate to being artistic. It worked for very few movies. It especially doesn't work here. Especially when the scenes and story are are so confusing already.
There's no scenes showing anything really. All the scenes are dialogue in rooms. This movie tries to tell this story of nuclear war, aliens, space travel, Sci Fi world with nuclear fallout, but you never see any scenes showing any of it. Characters talking about the war, or the aliens but you never really see anything. Some footage taken from the real Challenger spacecraft explosion is the most you'll get.
One scene's bad acting was actually punctuated by actual crickets. The scene of people talking outside and the crickets slow their chirping when the actors talk. They're so close the talking scares the crickets. It's off-putting. An additional small trademark of a bad movie.
The only take away I have here is the camera work is alright. No bad angles. Decent use of lenses and angles. Good placement.
Of course this is a B movie. At times it feels it's a few letters after that.
The movie is a bit confusing. It starts showing an alternate history in the 80's but it's so sloppy I sort of questioned if they were actually doing "alternate history", or if they just got their history very wrong. They never explain what's so different either. They're trying to say nuclear war happened, but it's very unclear what that affected. Where the nukes hit. Which should have been way clearer. Especially when you have your characters getting radiation sickness all the time. Having the big exposition dump done by bad child actors in a classroom was a really bad idea.
Even when it's not obviously confusing, characters do and say things that make no sense. Near the end, the movie adds some explanation that tries to explain away major issues. I say "tries" because it does a bad job and causes even more issues than it fixes.
This movie steals a lot of moments and lines from other movies. As a Sci-Fi fan, I noticed about 6 moments that were basically ripped right out of other movies. And no, it didn't feel like a tribute, it felt stolen. And in a bad cringe way. The bad acting just makes it worse. Not only that but it was really unnecessary to rip off those moments.
An example is the main girl is on a ham radio and interrupts a conversation. Then she does the exact line from Star Wars - the one where Han Solo is on the radio in the detention center on the Death Star. That scene here is UGLY!
A lot of those stolen moments were ugly. This movie ripped off so much, that it even copies itself at times. There are scenes of a kid that gets lost and someone finds their stuffed animal. That happens a few times. Different kids and stuffed animals.
Worst of all were the 80's TV show references. There's about 15 scenes where characters reference an 80's show. It was so excessive, that I worried that it would tie into the story somehow. Like a side effect of alien abduction would be that they referenced TV shows or something. The first time it happened makes sense, you're like OK, they're really trying to show that it's the 80's. Then next few times you're like OK, they're going overboard. But every time after that is extreme. Did the writer-director have memory problems?
If all the confusion, bad acting, and more wasn't bad enough, this movie does the "mix up all your scenes and do multiple timelines" thing.
Having multiple timelines and then mixing up your scenes haphazardly doesn't equate to being artistic. It worked for very few movies. It especially doesn't work here. Especially when the scenes and story are are so confusing already.
There's no scenes showing anything really. All the scenes are dialogue in rooms. This movie tries to tell this story of nuclear war, aliens, space travel, Sci Fi world with nuclear fallout, but you never see any scenes showing any of it. Characters talking about the war, or the aliens but you never really see anything. Some footage taken from the real Challenger spacecraft explosion is the most you'll get.
One scene's bad acting was actually punctuated by actual crickets. The scene of people talking outside and the crickets slow their chirping when the actors talk. They're so close the talking scares the crickets. It's off-putting. An additional small trademark of a bad movie.
The only take away I have here is the camera work is alright. No bad angles. Decent use of lenses and angles. Good placement.
To be honest, I haven't seen such a plot mess in a movie for a long time. I'm not even sure that I understood everything correctly. But it was interesting to sort out this mess. In order not to spoil the intrigue for future viewers, I'll just say "everything is not as simple as it seems at first glance." Assessing the film, I will say that it is not bad. But quite controversial. The acting of some actors (mostly children) raises questions - they played even too well. And this exaggerated expression is confusing. The dramatic, serious plot echoes their antics and at first it is difficult to understand what I am watching at all. Especially when we have aliens in the context of America battered by nuclear strikes. (sounds too strange) However, closer to the second half of the film, it becomes much easier to watch. Finally, I would like to highlight the slight protractedness of the film. Not everyone will appreciate this moment, but for those who like to thoughtfully watch films, this example is suitable.
I'm shocked this movie was ever made! Sometimes a B movie has bad acting but a great storyline so you continue to watch it wishing the right person with the right amount of money and contacts has the chance to produce it.
This .. this has neither!
It's a D movie at best. No storyline, beyond horrible acting, a purely pathetic attempt at every point of making a movie.
I honestly think the only reason a couple of the known actors did this, was either a HUGE FAVOR to someone or they lost a bet.
We TORTURED ourselves to finish the movie so that I could leave an honest review of the movie and not the first ten minutes that already had me wanting to run!
This .. this has neither!
It's a D movie at best. No storyline, beyond horrible acting, a purely pathetic attempt at every point of making a movie.
I honestly think the only reason a couple of the known actors did this, was either a HUGE FAVOR to someone or they lost a bet.
We TORTURED ourselves to finish the movie so that I could leave an honest review of the movie and not the first ten minutes that already had me wanting to run!
I was disappointed once again to be tricked into watching a movie I thought was a SciFi, but ended up being something entirely different. The synopsis states: "Following a nuclear attack, a girl receives a distress call from space that leads her on an extraterrestrial journey". Well, there is no call from space, no aliens, and no extraterrestrial journey. This is classic bait and switch, and it is not the first movie that plays the trick of calling itself a SciFi when it is not.
The movie disguises itself as a SciFi, but is actually a psychological drama. It takes an hour of movie watching to finally come to this realization, but by then you have been suckered into it.
There should be a law against passing a movie as a certain genre, when it is not.
The movie disguises itself as a SciFi, but is actually a psychological drama. It takes an hour of movie watching to finally come to this realization, but by then you have been suckered into it.
There should be a law against passing a movie as a certain genre, when it is not.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAt 51:17, Mayday responds on the ham radio, "Everything is fine here; situation normal, no kids, we're fine here now, thank you, how are you?" This echoes Han Solo's speech in Star Wars after they break into the detention block.
- ConnexionsReferences Dallas (1978)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Roswell Delirium?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Delírio em Roswell
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 1h 50min(110 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant






