[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de parutionsTop 250 des filmsFilms les plus regardésRechercher des films par genreSommet du box-officeHoraires et ticketsActualités du cinémaFilms indiens en vedette
    À la télé et en streamingTop 250 des sériesSéries les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités TV
    Que regarderDernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbFamily Entertainment GuidePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Nés aujourd’huiCélébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d’aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels du secteur
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

2:22

  • 2017
  • PG-13
  • 1h 38min
NOTE IMDb
5,7/10
27 k
MA NOTE
Michiel Huisman and Teresa Palmer in 2:22 (2017)
Trailer for 2:22
Lire trailer2:29
2 Videos
59 photos
Conspiracy ThrillerSuspense MysteryDramaMysteryRomanceSci-FiThriller

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA man's life is derailed when an ominous pattern of events repeats itself in exactly the same manner every day, ending at precisely 2:22 p.m.A man's life is derailed when an ominous pattern of events repeats itself in exactly the same manner every day, ending at precisely 2:22 p.m.A man's life is derailed when an ominous pattern of events repeats itself in exactly the same manner every day, ending at precisely 2:22 p.m.

  • Réalisation
    • Paul Currie
  • Scénario
    • Todd Stein
    • Nathan Parker
  • Casting principal
    • Michiel Huisman
    • Teresa Palmer
    • Sam Reid
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    5,7/10
    27 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Paul Currie
    • Scénario
      • Todd Stein
      • Nathan Parker
    • Casting principal
      • Michiel Huisman
      • Teresa Palmer
      • Sam Reid
    • 179avis d'utilisateurs
    • 38avis des critiques
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
    • Récompenses
      • 1 victoire et 2 nominations au total

    Vidéos2

    2:22
    Trailer 2:29
    2:22
    2:22 Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:26
    2:22 Official Trailer
    2:22 Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:26
    2:22 Official Trailer

    Photos59

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 52
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux60

    Modifier
    Michiel Huisman
    Michiel Huisman
    • Dylan Branson
    Teresa Palmer
    Teresa Palmer
    • Sarah Barton
    Sam Reid
    Sam Reid
    • Jonas Edman
    John Waters
    John Waters
    • Bill
    Kerry Armstrong
    Kerry Armstrong
    • Catherine Mills
    Richard Davies
    Richard Davies
    • Inky
    Maeve Dermody
    Maeve Dermody
    • Sandy
    Remy Hii
    Remy Hii
    • Benny
    Simone Kessell
    Simone Kessell
    • Serena
    Mitchell Butel
    Mitchell Butel
    • Howard Pace
    Barry Quin
    Barry Quin
    • Samuel Keifer
    Zara Michales
    Zara Michales
    • Ellie
    Nancy Denis
    • Regina Jones
    Duncan Ragg
    • Jake Redman
    Jessica Clarke
    • Evelyn Mills
    Jack Ellis
    Jack Ellis
    • Noah Marks
    Michael-Anthony Taylor
    • Ticket Booth Man
    Thuso Lekwape
    Thuso Lekwape
    • Waiter
    • Réalisation
      • Paul Currie
    • Scénario
      • Todd Stein
      • Nathan Parker
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs179

    5,726.6K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    4arthur_tafero

    Good Try; No Cigar - 2:22

    The star of this film are the screenwriters; Nathan and Stein, who take an incomplete idea and run with it. Unfortunately, when you rush, you sometimes make mistakes. This is one of those times. It is a real shame, and I am sure both writers will have a productive future. But this effort falls short due to the inability of the writers to clearly convey what they are writing about. The character of the air traffic controller is well-developed, but not anyone else. To get an effective chemistry for the audience, one must develop the TWO characters at the same time; not just one and then introduce another one much later. That device does not work, and helps to eventually ruin any connection the audience might have with the later character. This flaw is not the only reason the film is not successful. The premise of time travel (and this is a time travel film in the sense that Groundhog Day was a time travel film) is a difficult premise to work around as a film. Groundhog Day was successful because it had a great actor, Murray, and great comedy situations. This film has no sense of humor, nor does it have any sense of impending repeating events. The audience is intrigued, but then loses interest when there are no compelling examples before the final event of the phenomenon. A good try, but no cigar.
    5solojere

    2/22/22

    So I saw this movie on HBO Max and thought it would be perfect to watch on 2/22/22. And honestly, it was kind of underwhelming. The film follows Dylan, who has something bad happen to him every day at precisely 2:22 p.m. As the film goes on, it becomes clear that these events are somehow tied into a larger event that happened at 2:22 in either the past or the future or maybe even both ;). Overall it wasn't a terrible film, but it was nothing great either. At times I was kind of bored, and I never really cared about the characters. It wasn't the worst movie in the world, though, and there was nothing terrible about it. Just nothing great either. But I'm glad I watched it on 2/22/22. Not sure if I would recommend it, though.
    6fandomfatale

    Average, more style than substance

    Overall I enjoyed this movie but I think it was more style than substance. The direction and visuals were excellent - it's possibly worth watching the movie solely for them, especially if that's your kind of thing. The aerial ballet and art exhibit scenes in particular (which you get a hint of in the trailer) were stunning. It's a well-made movie with a sufficient budget.

    I don't want to spoil anything, so I'll just say it reminded me of Knowing and Twelve Monkeys - however, compared to those two movies, the stakes felt rather low and the mystery was never particularly compelling, on top of being a little too predictable. I always felt I knew the general direction it was heading, even if I didn't have all the details yet.
    5Gentzen

    A waste of time even for light entertainment

    Soapy cheese fest that don't cohere. Could well have been the script of an 80s music videoclip. Despite the decent enough production value, it can in fact be described as 90 odd minutes of two nice-looking people who fall in love trying (in vain, as far as sound story-telling goes) to find cosmic significance in their feelings. They do so through a mary-go-round story that uses all the trappings of the "stuck in a moment in time" motif without any of the logical puzzles, metaphysical ponderings, or even plain suspense that a situation like that may create. Love proper may reverberate down the ages, but this love affair's photons get trapped in the movie's scripting black hole and never make it out. Utterly forgettable.

    5 points to production value but nothing more than this.
    4shakercoola

    Overwrought and overstylised

    An American sci-fi drama; A story about an air traffic controller who is suspended from his job after a near miss incident, who starts to notice a reoccurence of the conditions that led to his suspension. Drawn into a complex relationship, he must figure out a way to control time itself. Pattern, repetition and predestination often feature in sci-fi fantasy movie plots, but when complicated ideas are ill-explained, it makes for difficult viewing for the circumspect viewer, even one prepared to suspend belief. The lead character is a poseur, a man of metropolitan cliché, rushing about carelessly - this runs in stark contrast to the traits one associates with an air traffic controller. The love story also feels unnatural. The stylisation of the film feels misplaced too with voiceovers that reduce the illusion further.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    The Wheel
    6,0
    The Wheel
    Amour et honneur
    5,7
    Amour et honneur
    Adaline
    7,2
    Adaline
    Life on Mars
    4,8
    Life on Mars
    Berlin Syndrome
    6,3
    Berlin Syndrome
    Warm Bodies : Renaissance
    6,8
    Warm Bodies : Renaissance
    Le dernier jour de ma vie
    6,4
    Le dernier jour de ma vie
    Numéro Quatre
    6,1
    Numéro Quatre
    222
    222
    2:22
    7,2
    2:22
    La Victoire à tout prix
    7,0
    La Victoire à tout prix
    Un choix
    6,5
    Un choix

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      During its one week theatrical release from June 30 to July 6, it only made $422, making it the lowest grossing film of 2017.
    • Gaffes
      In the opening scenes of New York the Twin Towers are clearly visible. In a later scene of New York we see the One World Trade Center.

      The first scene is in the dream. At that time in the dream, the twin towers still stood.
    • Citations

      Dylan: In everyone's life there comes a time when the universe opens itself for just a few moments to show us what's truly possible.

    • Connexions
      References La jetée (1962)
    • Bandes originales
      Cool on Fire
      Performed by Daniel Johns

      Composed by Daniel Johns / Joel Little

      Licensed by Sony/ATV Music Publishing (Australia) Pty Limited & EMI April Music Inc. Licensed by EMI Music Publishing Australia Pty Limited

      Under license from Eleven: A Music Company Pty Ltd

      Licensed courtesy of Universal Music Australia Pty Limited

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ18

    • How long is 2:22?Alimenté par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 30 juin 2017 (États-Unis)
    • Pays d’origine
      • Australie
      • États-Unis
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • 2:22 - Thời Khắc Định Mệnh
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Disney Studios, Moore Park, Sydney, Nouvelle-Galles du Sud, Australie
    • Sociétés de production
      • 2929 Productions
      • Entertainment One
      • Ingenious Media
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
      • 422 $US
    • Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
      • 294 $US
      • 2 juil. 2017
    • Montant brut mondial
      • 3 945 729 $US
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 38 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • D-Cinema 48kHz 5.1
    • Rapport de forme
      • 2.39 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    Michiel Huisman and Teresa Palmer in 2:22 (2017)
    Lacune principale
    What is the French language plot outline for 2:22 (2017)?
    Répondre
    • Voir plus de lacunes
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.