NOTE IMDb
6,5/10
4,5 k
MA NOTE
Lorsque la journaliste Kim Wall disparaît après être montée à bord du sous-marin de l'inventeur Peter Madsen, son histoire changeante sur son sort masque une vérité terrifiante.Lorsque la journaliste Kim Wall disparaît après être montée à bord du sous-marin de l'inventeur Peter Madsen, son histoire changeante sur son sort masque une vérité terrifiante.Lorsque la journaliste Kim Wall disparaît après être montée à bord du sous-marin de l'inventeur Peter Madsen, son histoire changeante sur son sort masque une vérité terrifiante.
- Réalisation
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire et 1 nomination au total
Avis à la une
I was broadly familiar with this murder, having been aware of it at the time it occurred. I wasn't aware of this documentary but someone mentioned it was on Netflix and worth watching, so I did.
Its an amazing coincidence (or not? - when did he know he would commit a crime, was he leaving easter eggs for the audience - it is weird) that there was a film crew in tow following Madsen right up until the day of the murder.
It was good in the sense that it showed how creepy Madsen was, hiding in plain sight, basically telling people what he was and what he was going to do, and no one noticed. It also showed the impact of his crime on all his interns and collaborators, who had recognised he was eccentric but had trust in him in terms of delivery of their project.
I understand that some of the people in the film were not happy about the final product and some voices and faces may have been changed using AI. I am really confused about that, the woman whose face is supposedly different just looks like she has a soft filter on, so I am not sure if her face is completely different or that slight blurriness is the effect. I'd actually be half tempted to google her to find out what she looks like to understand the nature of the special effect they have used, which probably defeats the object of them altering her appearance.
What was lacking was information about Kim Wall, there was barely anything, not even really proper photos, she is the victim, I would like to know a bit more about her. Also we never saw what the inside of the submarine was like.
Also, though some might not agree, for completion, I would like to know what they think happened on that submarine, a timeline of events, but there was nothing. He clearly just planned to get any female on there and kill them, and he basically told the girl who may have been his intended victim, that he had a plan, I would like to know, what happened. Did he drug her to incapacitate her? I don't know and when it comes to keeping safe from evil, it is useful to understand their methods. The actual event was not much of a feature of this documentary, it was just before and then briefly after and some reporting of the court case.
I feel like this documentary prompts more questions than it answers for a viewer who broadly knew of the murder but doesn't know all the details.
Its an amazing coincidence (or not? - when did he know he would commit a crime, was he leaving easter eggs for the audience - it is weird) that there was a film crew in tow following Madsen right up until the day of the murder.
It was good in the sense that it showed how creepy Madsen was, hiding in plain sight, basically telling people what he was and what he was going to do, and no one noticed. It also showed the impact of his crime on all his interns and collaborators, who had recognised he was eccentric but had trust in him in terms of delivery of their project.
I understand that some of the people in the film were not happy about the final product and some voices and faces may have been changed using AI. I am really confused about that, the woman whose face is supposedly different just looks like she has a soft filter on, so I am not sure if her face is completely different or that slight blurriness is the effect. I'd actually be half tempted to google her to find out what she looks like to understand the nature of the special effect they have used, which probably defeats the object of them altering her appearance.
What was lacking was information about Kim Wall, there was barely anything, not even really proper photos, she is the victim, I would like to know a bit more about her. Also we never saw what the inside of the submarine was like.
Also, though some might not agree, for completion, I would like to know what they think happened on that submarine, a timeline of events, but there was nothing. He clearly just planned to get any female on there and kill them, and he basically told the girl who may have been his intended victim, that he had a plan, I would like to know, what happened. Did he drug her to incapacitate her? I don't know and when it comes to keeping safe from evil, it is useful to understand their methods. The actual event was not much of a feature of this documentary, it was just before and then briefly after and some reporting of the court case.
I feel like this documentary prompts more questions than it answers for a viewer who broadly knew of the murder but doesn't know all the details.
I just started watching it, looked interesting, this guy built his own sub etc. Etc... I had NO IDEA that it was going to go the way it went. I'd never heard of this story before, so it was sort of a surprise to me, which was good.
Seemed a lot like a very self assured man and the people who congregate around him to be part of it all and help. OK, so that' exactly what it was - except turns out he's a psychopathic narcissist who just wants to kill a woman or something in his sub! Sorry if there are spoilers but the description on the page says all that also.
What got me was the people around him and how shocked they were and -- you know, how could you not know something was wrong with your "friend"?? It makes it all the more harrowing to realize that these people walk amongst us and that you could KNOW someone and not know them at all, and they are like this guy. So, it was interesting to me as I had no idea about the case nor what the doc was about, didn't even notice the tag line til later. LOL Interesting. TRULY scary. Real life horror.
Seemed a lot like a very self assured man and the people who congregate around him to be part of it all and help. OK, so that' exactly what it was - except turns out he's a psychopathic narcissist who just wants to kill a woman or something in his sub! Sorry if there are spoilers but the description on the page says all that also.
What got me was the people around him and how shocked they were and -- you know, how could you not know something was wrong with your "friend"?? It makes it all the more harrowing to realize that these people walk amongst us and that you could KNOW someone and not know them at all, and they are like this guy. So, it was interesting to me as I had no idea about the case nor what the doc was about, didn't even notice the tag line til later. LOL Interesting. TRULY scary. Real life horror.
This is a chilling exposé of a sociopath at work. In every frame of this absorbing documentary you cannot help but question the real motives of everything Peter Madsen says and does. Of course, hindsight is a wonderful thing and you really feel empathy for the cast of characters caught up in his web of deceit.
The producers and director do a great job weaving the characters (effectively innocent bystanders) to the main plot. The director also manages to ratchet up the tension as we get nearer and nearer to the already known, but still feared, denouement.
This is a great piece of documentary work by the same producers who gave us the equally absorbing Amanda Knox story.
The producers and director do a great job weaving the characters (effectively innocent bystanders) to the main plot. The director also manages to ratchet up the tension as we get nearer and nearer to the already known, but still feared, denouement.
This is a great piece of documentary work by the same producers who gave us the equally absorbing Amanda Knox story.
"Into the Deep" is basically a documentary about someone filming a documentary only to find out that the subject of their documentary is not at all what they seem. It's a true story, and as it unfolded in the film, I realized I had vague memories of reading about the events in the news but never heard how it all played out. The way this documentary is structured and paced, incrementally revealing more and more about what happened, kept me enthralled but simultaneously disturbed. Whoever cut this thing together knew just where to place some of the most bizarrely incriminating film footage that was shot when everyone thought they were just making a nice little film about an eccentric inventor with dreams of glory, as opposed to unwittingly documenting a narrative that is more suited to a Hitchcock film or maybe a Stephen King novel.
I have never heard of this before until I watched this documentary. It was very interesting to see how the people who worked with Peter Madsen on building his next project of a rocket-ship that they didn't see the red flags of this cool collected person like Peter Madsen. It kind of give you some clues why would you put a saw on a submarine? Or other tools that I can see. I
I do like the back and forth interviews between the people that knew Peter Madsen leading up to the trial; which I think he should have a death penalty. But I could see almost right off that Peter Madsen seems a little off and makes it wander if he had a rough childhood or was it later on. Who knows. But the guy will not let out anytime soon.
Good documentary.
I do like the back and forth interviews between the people that knew Peter Madsen leading up to the trial; which I think he should have a death penalty. But I could see almost right off that Peter Madsen seems a little off and makes it wander if he had a rough childhood or was it later on. Who knows. But the guy will not let out anytime soon.
Good documentary.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesInitially announced as premiering on Netflix in May 2020. Following it's theatrical premiere at Sundance Film Festival however, two subjects and the film's main cinematographer, Cam Matheson protested the film in the press, accusing director Emma Sullivan and producers Mette Heide and Roslyn Walker of neglecting consent and traumatizing subjects. Netflix removed all reference to the film from its services on March 16th.
- Citations
Self - Inventor: Self - Inventor: The thing is, it's been a side job of mine ever since I was a little boy to spoof out authorities, to make them believe that there is nothing wrong and then act.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Into the Deep?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 30 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant