Après avoir été trahi par son maître, un assassin désabusé tire une dernière fois avec l'intention d'utiliser l'argent pour aider un musicien qu'il a accidentellement rendu aveugle à retrouv... Tout lireAprès avoir été trahi par son maître, un assassin désabusé tire une dernière fois avec l'intention d'utiliser l'argent pour aider un musicien qu'il a accidentellement rendu aveugle à retrouver la vue.Après avoir été trahi par son maître, un assassin désabusé tire une dernière fois avec l'intention d'utiliser l'argent pour aider un musicien qu'il a accidentellement rendu aveugle à retrouver la vue.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 14 nominations au total
Avis à la une
Why John this is just not neccesary, this is simply an excuse to put two charismatic actors kicking assess, this is not a neccesary remake my guy, it's just like the original but without the essentially of that film, you should make a remake one of your American Van Damme movies, those are not good
The crow and now this one, stop remaking solid and classic movies please, you people should remade something like Waterworld or the Travolta alien movie, try to improve bad movies instead of remaking good ones, this is not a good remake and its feels forced and weird sometimes, you can do better ok guys.
The crow and now this one, stop remaking solid and classic movies please, you people should remade something like Waterworld or the Travolta alien movie, try to improve bad movies instead of remaking good ones, this is not a good remake and its feels forced and weird sometimes, you can do better ok guys.
It didn't.
I must say, I'm very impressed by Nathalie Immanuel lately. Her presence in Megalopolis, her acting here, her stunt work....
I mean, all the performances are as great as you'd expect them from a John Woo movie. But especially Nathalie Immanuel, Sam Worthington and Diana Silvers I don't think I've ever seen this good. Especially Silvers is a very underrated actress in this user's humble opinion.
This is such a cool movie. I have genuinely not idea what people's problem is these days. Weak, mid and OK movies get hyped to death and genuinely cool stuff gets panned.
And actors like Jenna Ortega get made fun of fur supposedly choosing bad projects. If it's so hard to understand why an actor would want to work with Brian Helgeland or star in something as bold and daring as Miller's Girl.
I must say, I'm very impressed by Nathalie Immanuel lately. Her presence in Megalopolis, her acting here, her stunt work....
I mean, all the performances are as great as you'd expect them from a John Woo movie. But especially Nathalie Immanuel, Sam Worthington and Diana Silvers I don't think I've ever seen this good. Especially Silvers is a very underrated actress in this user's humble opinion.
This is such a cool movie. I have genuinely not idea what people's problem is these days. Weak, mid and OK movies get hyped to death and genuinely cool stuff gets panned.
And actors like Jenna Ortega get made fun of fur supposedly choosing bad projects. If it's so hard to understand why an actor would want to work with Brian Helgeland or star in something as bold and daring as Miller's Girl.
I had to stop after 50min where I couldn't take it anymore, I mean it might be for someone but not for me.
John Woo has a style and I respect that! However I'm not sure if I would still have stomach for that in 2024, nearly 30 years after Faceoff.
You might ask how about the story then? Enough to know that a Killer with misplaced conscious caused a lot of civilians to die to avoid one particular civilian to die because she was against killing civilians. I know it's stupid. But that's the main theme, at least up until I said enough is enough. The plot has so many wholes and it looks so fake that even popular faces couldn't save it for me.
Do not waste your precious life with this movie, Mr Woo, please grow up.
John Woo has a style and I respect that! However I'm not sure if I would still have stomach for that in 2024, nearly 30 years after Faceoff.
You might ask how about the story then? Enough to know that a Killer with misplaced conscious caused a lot of civilians to die to avoid one particular civilian to die because she was against killing civilians. I know it's stupid. But that's the main theme, at least up until I said enough is enough. The plot has so many wholes and it looks so fake that even popular faces couldn't save it for me.
Do not waste your precious life with this movie, Mr Woo, please grow up.
I realise that John Woo is an iconic director, mainly because of his run of funky HK triad gunslinger movies, but whoever put this remake together skimped on the screenwriting, and the script. The direction is ok, but with the nagging feeling that the hourly rate there was also well shy of inspirational.
Every cliched character and trite line of dialogue feels disconnected, existing in isolation, awaiting their brief memetime on Tik Tok and Youtube.
Even the action felt kinda perfunctory, like a cheap sequel filmed in a hurry by an inferior production crew, with no sense of pride in their accomplishments. "Two more flash-cut car chases, an MMA ruck in a public space, a slow-mo bullet time shootout, and we're done, chaps".
What it resembles, more than anything, is a low-budget 80s Eurocrime actioner, with a mismatched Euro-cast, and a script straight out of Babelfish, tarted up in post to look vaguely modern. Unfortunately, it ends up looking like a badly animated storyboard.
Every cliched character and trite line of dialogue feels disconnected, existing in isolation, awaiting their brief memetime on Tik Tok and Youtube.
Even the action felt kinda perfunctory, like a cheap sequel filmed in a hurry by an inferior production crew, with no sense of pride in their accomplishments. "Two more flash-cut car chases, an MMA ruck in a public space, a slow-mo bullet time shootout, and we're done, chaps".
What it resembles, more than anything, is a low-budget 80s Eurocrime actioner, with a mismatched Euro-cast, and a script straight out of Babelfish, tarted up in post to look vaguely modern. Unfortunately, it ends up looking like a badly animated storyboard.
I enjoy a good straigh forward action movie but this was just complete nonsense. When you have a movie with such a dumb plot you need lots of good action to keep the audience from thinking about the stupid plot too much. This movie barely has any action and the action it has is mediocre at best. The acting is also mediocre at best. I liked the main actress, she had a good style to her and the black cop as well. The few scenes they had together where some of the best. This definitely had potential, there is some great camera work and stuns here and there but is just too little to keep your entretain.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesWalter Hill and David Giler wrote a script for a remake of The Killer (1989) as far back as 1992. It was planned to have starred Richard Gere and Denzel Washington.
- GaffesA world class killer for hire regularly and repeatedly goes to the same food place.
- Versions alternativesIs a remake of "The Killer" (original title: "Dip huet seung hung," 1989), also directed by John Woo.
- ConnexionsReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 958: The Crow (1994) (2024)
- Bandes originalesLet's Live for Today
Written by Peter Warne (as Michael Julien), Mogol (as Giulio Rapetti Mogol), Norman David Shapiro (as Norman Shapiro)
Produced by Wendy Wang
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Killer?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 30 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 318 618 $US
- Durée
- 2h 6min(126 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant