Se concentre sur le conflit entre Thor et Loki et la soif insatiable de pouvoir de Loki. Lorsque Loki échappe à Asgard avec l'intention de conquérir l'humanité, seul Thor a la force de l'arr... Tout lireSe concentre sur le conflit entre Thor et Loki et la soif insatiable de pouvoir de Loki. Lorsque Loki échappe à Asgard avec l'intention de conquérir l'humanité, seul Thor a la force de l'arrêter et d'empêcher la fin des temps.Se concentre sur le conflit entre Thor et Loki et la soif insatiable de pouvoir de Loki. Lorsque Loki échappe à Asgard avec l'intention de conquérir l'humanité, seul Thor a la force de l'arrêter et d'empêcher la fin des temps.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
This is not a fan film but the 2nd full blown production of a story involving THOR, which dates back to God of Thunder (2015). These two films are exactly the same, story wise, just repackaged for a new audience. Every value of each production is crappy, worst than some fan films but better than watching paint dry. This film is in a long line of others being gobbled up by Invincible Entertainment Partners, for like $50.00 a piece. This is not a bad thing, as Invincible is filling a need of streaming services such as NETFLIX and AMAZON to fill their coffers with unlimited content. These films, such as Thor:End of Days, are exactly what they intend to be - low budget mindless entertainment to take your mind off of.....whatever. These Invincible films also carry big name stars, usually in their first roles, and will use just enough Title endowment and marketing to get your attention - even for a brief moment. Yeah, it's free enterprise, so you keep going Invincible Entertainment Partners - keeping us entertained.....(JK)
This movie's budget is $1.5M which is a fraction of a percent of Marvel's movies, you can't exactly compare.
Considering that, it's not as bad as the reviewers make it seem, you can enjoy it if you know you're not watching a blockbuster, I enjoyed it, there were very few cringe moments because of the silly screams from the main actress, this could've been improved, the visual effects are even better than what you would expect from a movie with this budget.
Keep in mind that I'm not trying to compare this to the Marvel movies. It's a low budget film. That's no excuse for what we have here.
Some guy in hooded robes and wearing a mask is wandering around possessing people. Why? We have no idea until about halfway through the movie. Guessing who the villain is easy but motivation is lacking.
For the title character, there's some early 20s guy being attacked by the possessed people. As far as he knows he's just some regular guy with no idea as to what is going on. You can guess who he is but it's not until halfway through the movie that he remembers or is even capable of fighting back.
There's a fight scene against a bunch of innocent possessed people where he slaughters them all. They were carrying guns. Could have taken away all of their weapons but instead he just kills them.
Dialogue is nearly nonexistent and the sound quality is terrible. It requires turning up the volume to hear them and then having to turn it back down because the volume and sounds effects are so loud.
I cannot recommend this movie to anyone, even those who are the "so bad it's good" types. This is bad with no redeeming qualities.
Some guy in hooded robes and wearing a mask is wandering around possessing people. Why? We have no idea until about halfway through the movie. Guessing who the villain is easy but motivation is lacking.
For the title character, there's some early 20s guy being attacked by the possessed people. As far as he knows he's just some regular guy with no idea as to what is going on. You can guess who he is but it's not until halfway through the movie that he remembers or is even capable of fighting back.
There's a fight scene against a bunch of innocent possessed people where he slaughters them all. They were carrying guns. Could have taken away all of their weapons but instead he just kills them.
Dialogue is nearly nonexistent and the sound quality is terrible. It requires turning up the volume to hear them and then having to turn it back down because the volume and sounds effects are so loud.
I cannot recommend this movie to anyone, even those who are the "so bad it's good" types. This is bad with no redeeming qualities.
Now, if you're expecting the Thor and Loki from the MCU, this isn't it. This has more in common with the mythological Norse gods than Marvel Comics. If you enjoy Norse mythology, you'll probably enjoy this. If you're expecting MCU Thor and Loki, then you won't enjoy this at all. As for as budget vs. Quality, I've seen more expensive movies that were much worse.
I ran across this title on Tubi and I thought I'd check it out, expecting to see a low budget flick. Boy was I right. The story, the acting, the cinematography was all total crap. The only two things this movie is good for is a good laugh and to make sure your fast forward button works. I skimmed through it in less than five minutes and pretty much saw all I needed to see. What a waste of five minutes.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Thor: End of Days?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- God of Thunder
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 1 500 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée1 heure 31 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Thor: End of Days (2020) officially released in India in English?
Répondre