NOTE IMDb
4,5/10
5,2 k
MA NOTE
Six étrangers se réveillent piégés dans un champ de maïs sans fin pour découvrir que quelque chose de mystérieux les chasse.Six étrangers se réveillent piégés dans un champ de maïs sans fin pour découvrir que quelque chose de mystérieux les chasse.Six étrangers se réveillent piégés dans un champ de maïs sans fin pour découvrir que quelque chose de mystérieux les chasse.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
Escape the Field (2022) is a Lions Gate Picture that was exclusively released to Peacock. The storyline follows a group of people who mysteriously wake up in a corn field. The cornfield is a maze/puzzle combination the people need to figure out before something in the field kills them. Meanwhile they will try to figure out if any of their last memories can explain how they got here to begin with.
This movie is directed by Emerson Moore in his directorial debut and stars Jordan Claire Robbins (The Umbrella Academy), Theo Rossi (Sons of Anarchy), Shane West (The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen), Tahirah Sharif (The Haunting of Bly Manor) and Elena Juatco (Schitt's Creek).
This movie felt like Escape Room without the cool effects, interesting subplots and unique settings. This picture thought the corn field setting would be creative and creepy but it didn't work. The cast delivers solid performances and tries to carry the movie, but there are no good kills, no quality gore and no real memorable circumstances or scenes. The ending twist isn't as creative as they hoped and there's definitely no need for a sequel.
Overall, this tries to put a unique twist on films like Escape Room, Saw and Cube but fails. I would score this a 3.5-4/10 and recommend skipping it.
This movie is directed by Emerson Moore in his directorial debut and stars Jordan Claire Robbins (The Umbrella Academy), Theo Rossi (Sons of Anarchy), Shane West (The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen), Tahirah Sharif (The Haunting of Bly Manor) and Elena Juatco (Schitt's Creek).
This movie felt like Escape Room without the cool effects, interesting subplots and unique settings. This picture thought the corn field setting would be creative and creepy but it didn't work. The cast delivers solid performances and tries to carry the movie, but there are no good kills, no quality gore and no real memorable circumstances or scenes. The ending twist isn't as creative as they hoped and there's definitely no need for a sequel.
Overall, this tries to put a unique twist on films like Escape Room, Saw and Cube but fails. I would score this a 3.5-4/10 and recommend skipping it.
Not as bloody as Saw. Not as clever as Cube. Not as inventive as Escape Room. Not a good film.
Badly directed and edited, bad script, stupid ending, 'seen it all before' plot, mostly poor acting.
The black actress wins an award for the most annoying person in film...ever.
Avoid.
Badly directed and edited, bad script, stupid ending, 'seen it all before' plot, mostly poor acting.
The black actress wins an award for the most annoying person in film...ever.
Avoid.
An interesting and promising idea. Enjoyed the basic puzzle aspect of this at first. There were a few mildly predictable twists, some jump scares but the acting is kinda annoying and bad, the CGI effects laughable, but worst of all is the frustrating and unsatisfying ending that doesn't provide any explanation or answer any questions.
Basically felt like if Cube (1997) or Saw (2004) were set in a cornfield and not as good.
Basically felt like if Cube (1997) or Saw (2004) were set in a cornfield and not as good.
Ever seen the Canadian cult sci-fi thriller Cube?
How about Netflix's adaptation if the Stephen King story In The Long Grass?
Well, imagine the story of the first, but the setting of the second. That is what you have here.
And that's it. There's nothing new, nothing imaginative; just "Cube, but in a field".
Don't get me wrong, I wasn't bored at all, but everything just seemed too familiar. But there were other problems.
Some parts where painfully predictable. Others where the most over-played of clichés (the ex-soldier still haunted by how he let his platoon down, anyone?).
At one point, a character makes reference to something they couldn't have known about. It seems like a really clumsy hint that this character is not to be trusted, but it's never followed up, so why include it? Either the film-makers thought it was a clever way of second guessing the audience (it's not, because it makes things even more nonsensical) or they were not aware of their own continuity.
How about the "Impassable door" that totally blocks our heroes, only for one of them very shortly later to pass through (off camera and without any explanation or reference) with no apparent difficulty. Twice!
As I said, despite all the criticisms, I can't claim I wasn't entertained. The pace was good, and the acting largely fine (though a few of the characters were so 2D they would hardly have been missed however well acted).
It's just that, at best, it offered nothing new and, at worst, fell prey to all manner of clichés and plot-contrivences.
How about Netflix's adaptation if the Stephen King story In The Long Grass?
Well, imagine the story of the first, but the setting of the second. That is what you have here.
And that's it. There's nothing new, nothing imaginative; just "Cube, but in a field".
Don't get me wrong, I wasn't bored at all, but everything just seemed too familiar. But there were other problems.
Some parts where painfully predictable. Others where the most over-played of clichés (the ex-soldier still haunted by how he let his platoon down, anyone?).
At one point, a character makes reference to something they couldn't have known about. It seems like a really clumsy hint that this character is not to be trusted, but it's never followed up, so why include it? Either the film-makers thought it was a clever way of second guessing the audience (it's not, because it makes things even more nonsensical) or they were not aware of their own continuity.
How about the "Impassable door" that totally blocks our heroes, only for one of them very shortly later to pass through (off camera and without any explanation or reference) with no apparent difficulty. Twice!
As I said, despite all the criticisms, I can't claim I wasn't entertained. The pace was good, and the acting largely fine (though a few of the characters were so 2D they would hardly have been missed however well acted).
It's just that, at best, it offered nothing new and, at worst, fell prey to all manner of clichés and plot-contrivences.
I had no idea what this movie was about besides the information from the tv. I decided to give it a try and it wasn't a bad movie by any means. I'm not sure why all the negative reviews, people needed to be more open minded to the fact that everything was shutdown bc if CoVid when this was filmed. Nobody was working let alone making movies I think for the capabilities at the time it's a decent film and it has plenty of potential for a second film. The idea of dropping people off in the middle of nowhere and having them find their way out is definitely not new but the acting was good and there was plenty of mystery left if they wanted to pick things up again.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesFilmed in September 2020. Several of the actors who were originally cast before the pandemic ended up dropping out so producers had to recast them.
- Crédits fousThere is a mid-credits scene.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Escape the Field?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- El campo de la muerte
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 1 074 879 $US
- Durée1 heure 29 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Escape the Field (2022) officially released in India in English?
Répondre