L'histoire de la maison Targaryen se déroule deux-cents ans avant les événements de Game of Thrones.L'histoire de la maison Targaryen se déroule deux-cents ans avant les événements de Game of Thrones.L'histoire de la maison Targaryen se déroule deux-cents ans avant les événements de Game of Thrones.
- Récompensé par 1 Primetime Emmy
- 21 victoires et 91 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Résumé
Reviewers say 'House of the Dragon' is acclaimed for its storytelling, political intrigue, and Targaryen saga. Exceptional performances by Paddy Considine, Emma D'Arcy, and Matt Smith are highlighted. Stunning production design, elaborate costumes, and CGI dragons are praised. The show balances epic scale with intimate drama and stays true to George R. R. Martin's lore. However, some note pacing issues and lack of emotional connection.
Avis à la une
Despite the high anticipation surrounding the series, it's unfortunate that the only captivating element is the presence of dragons. The actors lack charisma, failing to bring their characters to life in a way that engages the audience. This deficiency in performance makes it nearly impossible to form any emotional connections with the characters. The narrative, which could have been enriched by strong, memorable personalities, instead falls flat, leaving viewers disinterested and detached. The dragons, while visually impressive, aren't enough to carry the entire show and redeem its shortcomings.
10IKC-4
House of the Dragon, the prequel to Game of Thrones, is a masterclass in political intrigue, family conflict, and high-stakes drama. Set 200 years before the events of its predecessor, the series dives deep into the Targaryen dynasty, exploring their rise, power struggles, and the seeds of internal conflict that eventually lead to civil war. The show expertly balances sweeping visuals with intimate character moments, ensuring that viewers are invested not only in the dragons and battles but also in the nuanced human dynamics.
Matt Smith as Prince Daemon delivers a magnetic, unpredictable performance, while Emma D'Arcy's portrayal of Rhaenyra Targaryen captures a mix of vulnerability, ambition, and defiance. The show's writing emphasizes moral ambiguity; characters are rarely purely heroic or villainous, reflecting the harsh realities of a world driven by power. The dragons themselves are visually stunning, with CGI that feels both realistic and awe-inspiring, adding weight to the narrative rather than overshadowing it.
The pacing, though deliberate, allows tension to build gradually, making political maneuvers and personal betrayals more impactful. Cinematography and production design immerse viewers in a richly detailed Westeros, from the opulent Red Keep to the vast, fiery landscapes of dragon flights.
While comparisons to Game of Thrones are inevitable, House of the Dragon establishes its own identity, focusing on the fragility of family bonds and the intoxicating allure of power. It's a compelling, visually breathtaking series that captures the essence of George R. R. Martin's world while promising an epic saga of ambition, loyalty, and betrayal.
Matt Smith as Prince Daemon delivers a magnetic, unpredictable performance, while Emma D'Arcy's portrayal of Rhaenyra Targaryen captures a mix of vulnerability, ambition, and defiance. The show's writing emphasizes moral ambiguity; characters are rarely purely heroic or villainous, reflecting the harsh realities of a world driven by power. The dragons themselves are visually stunning, with CGI that feels both realistic and awe-inspiring, adding weight to the narrative rather than overshadowing it.
The pacing, though deliberate, allows tension to build gradually, making political maneuvers and personal betrayals more impactful. Cinematography and production design immerse viewers in a richly detailed Westeros, from the opulent Red Keep to the vast, fiery landscapes of dragon flights.
While comparisons to Game of Thrones are inevitable, House of the Dragon establishes its own identity, focusing on the fragility of family bonds and the intoxicating allure of power. It's a compelling, visually breathtaking series that captures the essence of George R. R. Martin's world while promising an epic saga of ambition, loyalty, and betrayal.
I really loved it everything from the beginning to the end is just awesome. Game of Thrones is one of my favorite or my favorite series and them coming up with this one gives you the backstory of how Game of Thrones came out. I love how it keeps you in the edge always guessing thinking you know what's going on but then there's a twist I just love the show can't wait to see more.
First of all, I don't want to give this series a 10/10, especially right now, but I'm going to keep it at 10 because I still have hopes for a third season, and that's only because it's a Game of Thrones spin-off, and I hope the directors don't screw it up. The funny thing is, they still have a source book and writer alive! Wow, this is a complete and utter disaster. The reason I'm so upset is because they're dragging out a second season just to make money, making scenes from the books pointlessly ineffective and absurd. That's the only thing that bothers me, and I feel like the first season is slowly losing its quality.
Good first season. Some of the events feel skimmed through because of the time skip, some of the consequences to what happens during the course of the show take place off air because of the abruptly timed time skip. One of the main examples for this would be Viserys' reaction to the illicit relationship between his daughter and Daemon on multiple occasions when she was a child or Lord Corlys' long term response to Viserys' rejection of his proposal. And the relationship between Rhanerya and Daemon itself seemed under developed, the only possible reason Rhanerya had to wed him was it would strengthen her claim to the throne, other than their whole relationship was built on cryptic conversation that takes place in the Valryian language. Other than that the show is too immersive and it's hard to take sides as both of them have done many wrongs and are good in certain instances, it was nice to see all that slow burn drama that took place to unfold.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe Iron Throne has been greatly redesigned from Game of Thrones (2011). It is larger and more asymmetrical to more closely match the description in George R.R. Martin's novels, although it is still nowhere near that big: the throne in the books is a 40-foot, immovable, asymmetrical behemoth made from 1000 swords welded together, with the seat 20 feet above the ground, and only accessible by a flight of stairs; the person sitting on it addresses people down below from 40 feet away.
- Crédits fousThe first season's title sequence is centered on a model of the Old Valyria citadel, with blood trails running across the land and marked by symbols of the Targeryn family.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- La casa del dragón
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 1h(60 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant