[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Broadcast Signal Intrusion

  • 2021
  • 1h 44min
NOTE IMDb
5,4/10
3,6 k
MA NOTE
Broadcast Signal Intrusion (2021)
While logging tapes of decades-old TV broadcasts, video archivist James (Harry Shum Jr.) discovers a surreal and disturbing clip that James believes is the product of a mysterious broadcast signal hacking. His discovery takes a sinister turn when he tracks down similar broadcast intrusions that send him on an obsessive mission. Now James must confront two very real possibilities: that the videos may be clues to a crime beyond all comprehension; and that whoever was behind them may be very aware that James is coming uncomfortably close to the truth.
Lire trailer2:07
1 Video
52 photos
CriminalitéDrameHorreurMystèreThrillerThriller conspirationniste

À la fin des années 90, un archiviste vidéo déterre une série d'émissions de pirates sinistres et devient obsédé par la découverte de la sombre conspiration derrière elles.À la fin des années 90, un archiviste vidéo déterre une série d'émissions de pirates sinistres et devient obsédé par la découverte de la sombre conspiration derrière elles.À la fin des années 90, un archiviste vidéo déterre une série d'émissions de pirates sinistres et devient obsédé par la découverte de la sombre conspiration derrière elles.

  • Réalisation
    • Jacob Gentry
  • Scénario
    • Phil Drinkwater
    • Tim Woodall
  • Casting principal
    • Harry Shum Jr.
    • Kelley Mack
    • Chris Sullivan
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    5,4/10
    3,6 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Jacob Gentry
    • Scénario
      • Phil Drinkwater
      • Tim Woodall
    • Casting principal
      • Harry Shum Jr.
      • Kelley Mack
      • Chris Sullivan
    • 60avis d'utilisateurs
    • 72avis des critiques
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
    • Récompenses
      • 1 victoire au total

    Vidéos1

    Broadcast Signal Intrusion - Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:07
    Broadcast Signal Intrusion - Official Trailer

    Photos51

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 46
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux15

    Modifier
    Harry Shum Jr.
    Harry Shum Jr.
    • James
    • (as Harry Shum Jr)
    Kelley Mack
    Kelley Mack
    • Alice
    Chris Sullivan
    Chris Sullivan
    • The Phreaker
    Michael B. Woods
    Michael B. Woods
    • Macalister
    Arif Yampolsky
    • Chester
    Richard Cotovsky
    Richard Cotovsky
    • Brad
    Steven Pringle
    • Dr. Lithgow
    • (as Steve Pringle)
    Justin Welborn
    Justin Welborn
    • Michael
    Jennifer Jelsema
    Jennifer Jelsema
    • Nora
    Anthony E. Cabral
    Anthony E. Cabral
    • Group Sharer
    Madrid St. Angelo
    Madrid St. Angelo
    • The Proprietor
    Preston Tate Jr.
    • Manfred
    James Swanton
    James Swanton
    • SAL-E Sparx
    Jeff Dlugolecki
    • Creepy Guy in Alley
    • (non crédité)
    Thomas Kosik
    • Bar Patron
    • (non crédité)
    • Réalisation
      • Jacob Gentry
    • Scénario
      • Phil Drinkwater
      • Tim Woodall
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs60

    5,43.5K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    4rhett-p

    Trailer had me intrigued, but the film itself does not offer a whole lot more than that

    Not enough meat on the bone for this script, seemed like a decent setup but it never really got out of the first act and failed to establish any kind of "stakes" to help ramp up the tension. Overall production values were decent and the acting fine for the most part. I suggest giving this one a miss however as even the "creepy pasta" subject-matter is unfulfilling.
    4Victor_Fallon

    A man slowly goes down a very shallow rabbit-hole. Not a horror.

    Shum Jr is decent in the lead, but he's wrestling with a sloppy script and zero character development. The supporting cast is poor, all hammy hams. Every line is exposition - which I think is meant to be in the style of a 'hard-boiled detective thriller', but comes off as hokey.

    It's meant to be set in the late 90s, but the soundtrack seems to think this is a noir movie, full of saxophones and quirky embellishments. But there isn't a single visual noir element, so it never works. Then we'll get some 70s-style psychadelic music for no reason. What a mess. The cinematography flits between hand-held and locked at random, so there is no flow. It all boils down to poor direction.

    The story amounts to nothing - it's a simple procedural tale of a man investigating an unsolved mini-mystery with a bog-standard conclusion. For some reason, the movie is labeled as a 'horror', which is laughable. The VHS-style video 'intrusions' he is investigating are too hilarious to be creepy. And too innocuous. The 'crime' he is investigating for most of the runtime is the interruption of TV broadcasts. Why? Because the script says so, that's why.

    It's also too slow to be a thriller. It's like an extended X-Files episode, but not one of the good episodes.
    7lathe-of-heaven

    WOW! Seriously, wow... Extremely mysterious and intriguing, but ultimately very abstract and may annoy those who like a tidy ending (or any explanation at all... 😁)

    Whew... I just this minute finished watching this. This is one of those odd films that takes many twists and turns, but doesn't clearly explain everything. First and foremost, this is a Mystery. Period. If you like a movie that really, REALLY draws you in and truly keeps you wondering what the HELL is going to happen next, this is for you.

    This is one of those films where although in its execution it does come across as a fairly 'normal' movie, but as it gradually takes you down the rabbit hole, along with the main protagonist, you really begin to wonder what is behind all of this. And remember, this is all started by just a chance circumstance where this fellow whose job it is to transfer video cassettes randomly happens across this odd pirate signal in one of the many mundane broadcasts that he is copying from many years previously.

    So, for such an odd, completely random event to draw him and us the audience into this mysterious labyrinth trying to find out what is going on, is in and of itself a bit of a mind-blower. Let me tell you, what happens next and the events that follow will challenge your mind's elasticity. Heh... I know I'm kind of building this up somewhat, because just the overall impact of it is so strange and unsettling. But, the actual progression of events take place, at least at first, just like a 'normal' mystery... That is, until you get to the end, but of course we are not going to talk about that 😊

    The acting is okay, it gets the job done and is sufficient. Without giving anything away, I will say that I felt the fellow connected to the storage unit was absolutely THE best actor here by far. It was a small scene, but he frigg'n NAILED it! The technical merits are fine and everything as far as the actual filmmaking is done competently. It's just the frigg'n STORY that ultimately grabs you by the nether regions and smacks you around until you wonder what the HELL just happened!

    I personally really liked the ultimate abstract nature of the story, even though it leaves you hanging 7 different way from Sunday (is that even an expression...?) and leaves many, MANY loose ends. BUT... for many people, I can see where like some of the other reviewers have stated in their titles here, it may just seem like 'nothing is happening' or that things don't seem to make sense. And, I can see where many probably will not care for that. But, I would say that, again, first and foremost, if you like a really intriguing mystery, and you don't mind a bit of a trip through the Looking Glass that ultimately and quite literally leaves you out on an unknown road somewhere, you might actually find this movie as unsettling and intriguing as I did.
    6Dottsylove

    interesting premise for a film

    These broadcast signal intrusions are really real. Go look it up on google. The one I know about is the Max Headroom pirate video back in the 80's CREEPY --and that's what this movie feeds on. Following a man as he searches for 3 of these specific intrusion to see if it leads to a pattern that has mystified police in the past. Creepy fun but didn't get the ending. 6.3 out of 10.
    6kmashburn-00043

    The good outweighs the bad...

    Don't worry about spoilers. I'm not entirely sure I know what happened.

    I love obscure, ambiguous endings open to broad interpretation...up to a point. The ending here was a bit too "not sure how to wrap this one up, so...here you go." Roll credits. Or maybe it was the result of slash and burn editing. I don't know.

    The lead (James) was believable and intense, and the mystery, atmosphere, and creepy imagery definitely held my attention. The music was...ugh. Distracting and, well...intrusive at times. Almost like the composer was scoring a completely different film.

    I have my own theory about the ending, but this one requires a re-watch. Few horror movies warrant revisiting, but even with its flaws, this isn't one I'll forget 20min after the end credits. I'm not lazy about probing alternate interpretations, but I need something a bit more solid to work with. That being said, I will watch this one again and scour for clues. I rarely write reviews, but this one was effective as an "experience," if not as a full-fledged narrative.

    If you're OK with the slow burn and can tolerate a "WTF" ending, give this one a shot. I can overlook some of the technical drawbacks if a movie is unique, memorable, and brave enough to abandon the horror formula. The cliches are here, too, of course, but this movie is miles above 90% of current horror fare.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    Howard's Mill
    5,9
    Howard's Mill
    Horror in the High Desert 2: Minerva
    5,3
    Horror in the High Desert 2: Minerva
    Horror in the High Desert
    5,4
    Horror in the High Desert
    Come True
    6,0
    Come True
    Night Sky
    6,3
    Night Sky
    Ultrasound
    5,8
    Ultrasound
    Historia de lo Oculto
    6,4
    Historia de lo Oculto
    Knocking
    5,7
    Knocking
    Broadcast Signal Intrusion
    6,1
    Broadcast Signal Intrusion
    She Will
    5,4
    She Will
    Hammer Down
    7,3
    Hammer Down
    February
    5,9
    February

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      The film's SAL-E Sparx broadcasts are patterned after actual events. In Chicago, on November 22, 1987, someone wearing a Max Headroom (1987) mask interrupted WGN's 9 o'clock news for 25 seconds. 2 hours later the same person interrupted WTTW's airing of Docteur Who (1963) for 90 seconds.
    • Gaffes
      The Phreaker says he turned 15 in 1987, and the movie's set in 1999, making him 27. But the actor who plays him is over 40, and clearly looks it.

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ

    • How long is Broadcast Signal Intrusion?Alimenté par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 22 octobre 2021 (États-Unis)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Site officiel
      • Official site
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Korsan Yayın
    • Société de production
      • Queensbury Pictures
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 44 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Rapport de forme
      • 2.39:1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.