Dark Resurrection

Nice movie, acting above average. Well, for what i've seen in the screen, the actors looked like pro, not amateurs. Well, they look like theater actors. But their acting is way better than revelations. The photography is also superb, with a lens filter that creates a nice foggy effect. The drawback is the story, that's somewhat confusing. And has some inconsistencies with the star wars jedi canon. Pretty impressive in the format, but somehow, it lacks content. But, it has some nice light saber fights and some good visual effects. Nice landscapes also. The locations were very beautiful. Good, but not great.

First the bad news. Well, it's in Italian, however, the English subtitles are excellent. In fact the subtitles are better done than many theatrical releases I've seen. The lead actress isn't very strong or dynamic. The plot is a bit murky but not so much so that you can't figure things out.

Now for the good stuff. The location in the Italian mountains is absolutely top notch. In fact I found myself looking at the scenery as much as I was watching the movie. Ancient Roman ruins are evident everywhere. That was a terrific choice. The actors are generally skilled, dynamic experienced actors. They can deliver a line and mean what they are saying. Technically the film can barely be faulted. A few scenes were overexposed but that may have been intentional for effect. This flick has a large cast. There are plenty of actors which gives it a big budget feel. The fight scenes are top notch. I guess this is just part one of a two part flick that I watched. It makes me want to watch the second part very much. Well done folks.

While I admire all the effort that went into making this film, I'd be lying if I said I liked it.

Out of all the "Star Wars" fan films I've seen so far, this one is without a doubt the best made one on a technical level; the costumes, sets, effects, and acting are all very well done. Unfortunately, from a storytelling point-of-view, I find it very underwhelming.

First things first, I didn't like how the Jedi are portrayed in this. Not only do they come off as far too powerful -- throwing up Force fields, regenerating from wounds at an accelerated rate, etc. -- they come off as a cross between the PT Jedi and the Bene Gesserit from the Dune Universe, which -- IMO -- is NOT how the Jedi of Luke Skywalker's Order should be portrayed; the Jedi should be warmer, more human and relatable, not cold traditionalists with a pseudo-matriarchal council trying to create a genetic super-being.

Second, the main villain's regenerative capabilities -- far, far too over the top. Not only can he recover after being run through with a lightsaber, but he can also regenerate from complete incineration(!) Like I said with the Jedi above, he's just too damn powerful, only more so.

Now, as for the characters -- I just didn't care about any of them. The Jedi, like I said, are too frigid, while the Sith/Imperials just don't have defined character whatsoever beyond being typical black hat bad guys.

In regards to the plot, it was needlessly confusing in places. When the first flashbacks pop up, for example, they pop at random with no telltale transitions given to indicate that they even were flashbacks; it's only once you get through them that you realize they're supposed to take place in the past, not the present. More effort definitely should have been put into making the flashbacks look like actual flashbacks.

Also, what's with the Imperial fleet the Sith are allied with? Where did they come from? Does the Empire coexist with the New Republic in this timeframe? Is it some kind of Imperial remnant? Did the Empire somehow reconquer the galaxy? What's going on with those guys?

Now, as for the Sith themselves. I'm just going to be frank -- I don't like Sith anymore, not the modern PT-inspired incarnation of the Sith, anyway. Even if I didn't have a problem with Sith, though, I'd still have a problem with how they're shoehorned into the plot. Where did they come from? Did the main baddie recreate the Sith? Did he just join with a Sith organization that was already in existence? No info about them is revealed or alluded to at all at any point in the film. It's apparent that the Sith characters should have just been Dark Jedi.

Now, for my final issue with this film -- the lightsaber colours. I know it's the in-thing to go with the stupid RGB lightsaber colour scheme from the prequels these days, but I would have preferred more lightsaber colours between the Jedi and the Sith.

In the end, I give this film 6/10.

I am huge star wars fan, not so much of movies but the mythologies created by them. My biggest disappointment with the prequels is that they never explored the humanity of the characters, instead just delivering on bland explanatory dialog. Such as "general grievous's ship is straight ahead" etc etc. I found none of the really interesting questions about what it would mean to be Jedi where explored, the burden of the responsibility, the internal struggle to master your fear, or even what it means to be taken from your family without choice.

Not here though I found myself actually absorbed in these characters, and believing in their humanity. I also greatly enjoyed the visual aesthetic created by the lens filter, which served to blend the CGI elements into the action more realistically.

Sorran was well filmed using occasional close ups of his face making him a menacing character, with minimal to no dialog needed to convey his power. The climatic saber battle was intense and well shot, where most have been guys simply banging sticks together this one uses a myriad of camera angles, close ups and outside action shots to convey the real urgency of people fighting to death. Something other films would do well to put thought into.

This has some great concepts, effects and impressive filmography, my only knock is the over use of choir music. A little is okay to build tension, but I felt it was little over done.

I highly recommend, but you will need to except it as great fan produced media rather than Hollywood blockbuster.

Hi, Well i just finished watching this, and thought it was was excellent. Quite recently I only got around to watching Revenge of the Sith. I gave it an 8, but am not sure if a 7 would have been more appropriate. The dialogue except for some rare occasions was rather poor. But anyway, I'm here to talk about Resurrection. This was different. The acting was excellent. The storyline was pretty good. The Dialogue was better than Sith. Although that "inner voice" caption took away a little bit from the atmosphere. I watched it in Italian with subtitles by the way. What intrigued me most were the wonderful faces. It reminded me of Pasolini's The Gospel According to Saint Matthew. I was also reminded of the films of Robert Bresson. Well, if Bresson had been asked to direct a Star Wars movie. It had a kind of austereness to it. Perhaps that was to do with the budget. Somewhere (perhaps here or youtube). I read that when doing the prequels Gary Kurtz was more interested in concentrating on the spiritual side of the force, whereas Lucas was more concerned with the merchandising. This film is as if Kurtz got his way. Still you have to give Lucas kudos for allowing these fan films to be made.