NOTE IMDb
5,5/10
610
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA home stager looking to land a promotion offers to plan the company Christmas party in order to sway the boss' decision her way.A home stager looking to land a promotion offers to plan the company Christmas party in order to sway the boss' decision her way.A home stager looking to land a promotion offers to plan the company Christmas party in order to sway the boss' decision her way.
Karina Gale
- Stella
- (as Karina Segura)
Yesenia Davis
- School Kid
- (non crédité)
Nicole Duke
- Inn Guest
- (non crédité)
John Forker
- Coffee Shop Patron
- (non crédité)
Jade Gottfredson
- Pedestrian
- (non crédité)
Craig Gregersen
- Pie Shop Patron
- (non crédité)
- …
Jerome Brad Halgren
- Christmas Tree Buyer
- (non crédité)
- …
Avis à la une
When I first read some of the reviews about how bad the acting was, I thought people were just being overly critical/mean. They WEREN'T. The lead actress came across as incredibly fake. She talked so slowly and sounded like she was speaking to a five year old every time she opened her mouth. It was very hard to watch and incredibly annoying. He wasn't much better.
I understand it's suppose to be a corny Christmas movie, but the acting is so poor. George and the other girl, from Sabrina the Teenage Witch, are good actors. So it was so surprising that they fell flat. There just wasn't chemistry or a spark between them. The little girl was the best actor out of the entire movie.
It just didn't play on my heartstrings as much as I expected it to be. The eye contact and connection seemed forced and not real.
I love George Stults, but this is getting deleted from my DVR.
It just didn't play on my heartstrings as much as I expected it to be. The eye contact and connection seemed forced and not real.
I love George Stults, but this is getting deleted from my DVR.
Lead actress is over acting - happy - merry - disappointed - whatever the mood. Lead actor is lacking expression.
A Christmas stager uses the house of a widower and his little girl. Romance ensues. Not that much story and the stars are a little detached and uncharismatic. Below Hallmark standards.
The staging aspect is not a common plot device, although there have been a couple of TV movies that used this theme. What is used way too often is doing-a-good-job-means-a-promotion followed closely by the-promotion-will-take-us-apart. Up to the climax, any viewer could have told pretty much everything that would happen, with the possible exception of storm Meghan which has been in most or all of Lifetime's premieres this year. And of course the ending is predictable too, but what brings it about was a a little surprise for me.
Other than whether the party would succeed and the possible promotion, there was very little tension or conflict.
I wasn't impressed with the acting. It didn't seem natural. George Stults seemed stiff to me and Soleil Moon Frye wasn't much better. They had so much screen time together, it wouldn't be entirely accurate to say there was no chemistry, but it wasn't great. As is often the case in movies with a widower and daughter, the leading lady and kid seemed to have more chemistry than the leading couple. On the other hand, the acting didn't turn me off so badly that I still couldn't enjoy the movie at least some. And the role of the little girl was well done avoiding overplaying the role as kid actors sometimes do.
In holiday movies, I enjoy them more when they include music and singing by the cast. There were a couple of group participation songs which were nice.
Addendum: While watching this again, it hit me that one word describes this movie - sugar. There is too much sugar, especially with Frye but Stults too. I enjoyed this movie because of the sugar, but it was still too sweet.
Other than whether the party would succeed and the possible promotion, there was very little tension or conflict.
I wasn't impressed with the acting. It didn't seem natural. George Stults seemed stiff to me and Soleil Moon Frye wasn't much better. They had so much screen time together, it wouldn't be entirely accurate to say there was no chemistry, but it wasn't great. As is often the case in movies with a widower and daughter, the leading lady and kid seemed to have more chemistry than the leading couple. On the other hand, the acting didn't turn me off so badly that I still couldn't enjoy the movie at least some. And the role of the little girl was well done avoiding overplaying the role as kid actors sometimes do.
In holiday movies, I enjoy them more when they include music and singing by the cast. There were a couple of group participation songs which were nice.
Addendum: While watching this again, it hit me that one word describes this movie - sugar. There is too much sugar, especially with Frye but Stults too. I enjoyed this movie because of the sugar, but it was still too sweet.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis movie takes place in Colorado, where George Stults grew up.
- Gaffes18 minutes into the movie, when Lori is learning about Maddie's dead mother, a close up shows Lori placing a hand on Maddie to console her. In the next shot Maddie is seen without anyone near her, and then the camera moves back to Lori who, presumably, still has a hand on Maddie.
- Bandes originalesJingle Bells
(uncredited)
Written by James Pierpont
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Un décor de rêve pour Noël (2019) officially released in Canada in English?
Répondre