Unexplained: Caught on Camera

Paranormal: Caught On Camera and Unexplainded: Caught On Camera are twins. You see a video on one, you can be sure it'll show up on the other. Problem is, they choose some videos that have been pretty much debunked or just sadly pathetic.

This show depends on totally ignorant people. Simple physics could explain 70% of the so-called "unexplained". How on earth are people this stupid now? You have two guys running around with a tape recorder and a camera. One guys say "oh! I think I just saw something" but there is no recording or photo. So? I'm supposed to believe these guys? No!! Just cancel this garbage.

That blond psychic Deborah would think a person with a sheet over their head, with eyes holes cut out was an actual ghost. Every video she sees she gives slight variations of, "I absolutely believe that person encountered something paranormal!" There's videos of people running around with cameras at crazy angles, then claiming, "I feel a cold spot!" or "OMG SOMETHING JUST TOUCHED ME!" and Deborah jumps on the paranormal bandwagon to exclaim "I absolutely believe those people encountered something paranormal. That was absolutely a real video!" If she's trying to sell herself as a true psychic she's sadly sabotaging herself and her business. At least the others sometime question what they see.

Also, I'm not tuning in to watch "Paranormal FELT on Camera" or "Unexplained: FELT on Camera". I don't care to watch people screaming because they felt a cold spot, or felt something "touch" them. I turn the TV on to see the "paranormal" and/or "unexplained"...however fake it may be. That's the fun part. That Deborah thought...she's annoying. I wish they'd take her off. Send her back to her 1-800-PSYCHIC job.

Susan Slaughter does not add anything to the show and sometimes says what I think distracts. She does not appear to be experienced and yet is allowed to discuss issues about which she appears to know nothing about.

The Parapsychologist who likes to find even the most obscure possibility, as a debunk for phenomena, especially repeative phenomena, is simply in denial. One example he used to white wash all Orbs is that the only happen on digital format cameras. That isn't true first of all, I've seen many orb photos on film except the exposures are usually longer and one would see trails instead. Even if it were true, different formats see different ranges or types of phenomena, even instruments in the same venue. For example, an AM radio won't de-modulate a FM signal or vice-versa, and there are many examples of what a particular device can "see". He as a self proclaimed scientist should know that. I use multiple instruments, not because any of them are ineffective, but because they all have limits to what they are designed to sense.

In general, and with the exception noted above, I find this show better than the other program which uses completely unqualified commentators who merely repeat the obvious.