Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueClip show featuring remarkable, terrifying and unexplained camera footage. With first-hand accounts from those who captured the images and analysis from experts.Clip show featuring remarkable, terrifying and unexplained camera footage. With first-hand accounts from those who captured the images and analysis from experts.Clip show featuring remarkable, terrifying and unexplained camera footage. With first-hand accounts from those who captured the images and analysis from experts.
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
Susan Slaughter does not add anything to the show and sometimes says what I think distracts. She does not appear to be experienced and yet is allowed to discuss issues about which she appears to know nothing about.
I think the shows great! I noticed everyone doesn't jump on the band wagon and often offer up different theories as took what's happening on the footage. The 1 Sceptic is absolutely annoying! Sometimes actually to the point I change channels.... Flat out rude and ignorant! Show would be much better off without him.... In my opinion of course!!! I'm sure there's other willfully ignorant people out there that side with him....
At least on paranormal caught on camera they use real footage sent in by real viewers with occasional reenactments that are described as such. This show is so contrived and fake I don't enjoy it. You can tell that each edition of this show is filmed by the same style of cameras. I wish they showed/mix in real footage and I would enjoy it much more. Thank you!!!!!
The Parapsychologist who likes to find even the most obscure possibility, as a debunk for phenomena, especially repeative phenomena, is simply in denial. One example he used to white wash all Orbs is that the only happen on digital format cameras. That isn't true first of all, I've seen many orb photos on film except the exposures are usually longer and one would see trails instead. Even if it were true, different formats see different ranges or types of phenomena, even instruments in the same venue. For example, an AM radio won't de-modulate a FM signal or vice-versa, and there are many examples of what a particular device can "see". He as a self proclaimed scientist should know that. I use multiple instruments, not because any of them are ineffective, but because they all have limits to what they are designed to sense.
In general, and with the exception noted above, I find this show better than the other program which uses completely unqualified commentators who merely repeat the obvious.
In general, and with the exception noted above, I find this show better than the other program which uses completely unqualified commentators who merely repeat the obvious.
That blond psychic Deborah would think a person with a sheet over their head, with eyes holes cut out was an actual ghost. Every video she sees she gives slight variations of, "I absolutely believe that person encountered something paranormal!" There's videos of people running around with cameras at crazy angles, then claiming, "I feel a cold spot!" or "OMG SOMETHING JUST TOUCHED ME!" and Deborah jumps on the paranormal bandwagon to exclaim "I absolutely believe those people encountered something paranormal. That was absolutely a real video!" If she's trying to sell herself as a true psychic she's sadly sabotaging herself and her business. At least the others sometime question what they see.
Also, I'm not tuning in to watch "Paranormal FELT on Camera" or "Unexplained: FELT on Camera". I don't care to watch people screaming because they felt a cold spot, or felt something "touch" them. I turn the TV on to see the "paranormal" and/or "unexplained"...however fake it may be. That's the fun part. That Deborah thought...she's annoying. I wish they'd take her off. Send her back to her 1-800-PSYCHIC job.
Also, I'm not tuning in to watch "Paranormal FELT on Camera" or "Unexplained: FELT on Camera". I don't care to watch people screaming because they felt a cold spot, or felt something "touch" them. I turn the TV on to see the "paranormal" and/or "unexplained"...however fake it may be. That's the fun part. That Deborah thought...she's annoying. I wish they'd take her off. Send her back to her 1-800-PSYCHIC job.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesShows way more footage than Paranormal Caught on Camera (2019). For example, in UFOs in the Forest, Sightings by the Sea and Demon in a Box (2021), the Canada man being pursued by his box of "Canneberges" cereal shows way more instances of the box moving on the kitchen counter towards him, whereas PCOC only showed the final instance, and repeated that over and over again. (Audiences have counted over a dozen times for a clip to be repeated on that show, while their "experts" comment.) Also, this show doesn't seem to blur audience-submitted paranormal videos beyond 80p, which is the norm at PCOC, their 'sister' show.
- GaffesIn one segment, they showed a woman afflicted with some sort of psychopathy, possibly dementia praecox, and who decided to marry her life-size zombie doll in her backyard. This had absolutely nothing unexplained whatsoever and nothing paranormal. This show isn't about pathology yet it went on interviewing the woman with an abnormal fixation for one of her dolls. (This rather belonged on TLC, right along with the hoarders' shows.)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does Unexplained: Caught on Camera have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant