NOTE IMDb
4,4/10
1,3 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueWith his good ape friend, a girl scout named Ursula, and a jungle companion named Magnolia by his side, there's no challenge too big for George, the king of the jungle.With his good ape friend, a girl scout named Ursula, and a jungle companion named Magnolia by his side, there's no challenge too big for George, the king of the jungle.With his good ape friend, a girl scout named Ursula, and a jungle companion named Magnolia by his side, there's no challenge too big for George, the king of the jungle.
- Récompenses
- 5 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
The most horrible show ever from 2007-2008 just like Out Of Jimmy's Head which also sucks this show is disgusting because it contains a lot of toilet humor just like Breadwinners, Sanjay And Craig, Pig Goat Banana Cricket, Fanboy And Chum Chum, Secret Mountain Fort Awesome and The Problem Solverz.
When it came to facing danger - I saw George as being a jungle-man who clearly knew his limits.
And, just because George "sometimes" (and I do emphasize the word "sometimes") ran away (and, yes, even hid) when faced with a perilous situation, that didn't necessarily make him a coward in my eyes. I mean, George was certainly no dummy.
And, besides the George character here - I found myself somewhat puzzled by Ursula and Magnolia. Like, neither of these 2 chicks had any romantic ties with George - So, because of that - I began to seriously suspect them of being a pair of "closet" lesbians, though, of course, that sexual possibility was never really reinforced in any way.
All-in-all - I found this animated, Canadian, TV production from 2007 to be fairly entertaining, for the most part.... And, yes - George certainly was a silly, immature klutz a good part of the time - But, hey! - After all this TV program was, in fact, just a kid's cartoon.
And, just because George "sometimes" (and I do emphasize the word "sometimes") ran away (and, yes, even hid) when faced with a perilous situation, that didn't necessarily make him a coward in my eyes. I mean, George was certainly no dummy.
And, besides the George character here - I found myself somewhat puzzled by Ursula and Magnolia. Like, neither of these 2 chicks had any romantic ties with George - So, because of that - I began to seriously suspect them of being a pair of "closet" lesbians, though, of course, that sexual possibility was never really reinforced in any way.
All-in-all - I found this animated, Canadian, TV production from 2007 to be fairly entertaining, for the most part.... And, yes - George certainly was a silly, immature klutz a good part of the time - But, hey! - After all this TV program was, in fact, just a kid's cartoon.
(IMO) - This 2-D animated TV series (from 2007-2008) had both its fair share of entertaining moments, as well as its not-so-entertaining moments, too.
And, as a viewer, if you aren't totally willing to forgive our childlike hero, George for being the bungling klutz that he obviously was, then, I'd suggest that you pass on viewing any of these episodes and find something more to your liking to watch.
As for me - Yes. I will admit that "George of the Jungle" certainly did have its limits when it came to originality in its story-lines. But, all the same - I kinda grew to like the George character who (when faced with certain dangers) actually did quite the opposite by running away every once in a while.
And, as a viewer, if you aren't totally willing to forgive our childlike hero, George for being the bungling klutz that he obviously was, then, I'd suggest that you pass on viewing any of these episodes and find something more to your liking to watch.
As for me - Yes. I will admit that "George of the Jungle" certainly did have its limits when it came to originality in its story-lines. But, all the same - I kinda grew to like the George character who (when faced with certain dangers) actually did quite the opposite by running away every once in a while.
Yes I know George of the Jungle was before my Time but I grew up watching the Re-Runs of the Classic Cartoon as a Kid and Loved it as well as the First George of the Jungle Movie (Not that terrible 2nd one) But this Cartoon tries to Keep the Spirit of George of the Jungle Alive to a New Generation but Fails.. I mean I have a lot to Complain about this New Series especially with The New Mindy Character sorry but Not a Good Addtion and George Seems like a Wimp in this I mean hes supposed to be really Muscular and Fit and A Big guy but all Around Good Guy and well Hits the TREE!!!! For Fans of the Old Cartoons I suggest Stray Away from this As Much As Possible because its not the Same George we know and Love but Im not giving this a 1 out of ten because at least its trying to get a New Generation into the Classics and Good Cartoons .. If you can Track the Old George of the Jungle The Kids Will still Love it!!!
It's one thing to remake a classic for the modern age and to gussy it up with modern references. It's something else to take a classic and totally mess it up into something that only shares the same name as the original. The latter is what you get with this modern version of "George of the Jungle".
Where do I even start? While the original had some really cheap animation, and I'll be the first to admit it was done cheaply, the animation had heart. The cheapness added to the whole thing. But with this, it just feels soulless and corporate. You know, it's like something designed by committee and it lacks the heart and the soul that the original had.
All of that could be forgiven if the writing was any good. But it's not. This is a a poorly written cartoon. Gone is the clever wit and sight gags and we now have tired and cliche settings. The characters even have a 2D feel about them. It's just not funny and not worthy of the name George of the Jungle.
I suggest seeing the original series or the first live action movie if you want a taste of what this could have been.
Where do I even start? While the original had some really cheap animation, and I'll be the first to admit it was done cheaply, the animation had heart. The cheapness added to the whole thing. But with this, it just feels soulless and corporate. You know, it's like something designed by committee and it lacks the heart and the soul that the original had.
All of that could be forgiven if the writing was any good. But it's not. This is a a poorly written cartoon. Gone is the clever wit and sight gags and we now have tired and cliche settings. The characters even have a 2D feel about them. It's just not funny and not worthy of the name George of the Jungle.
I suggest seeing the original series or the first live action movie if you want a taste of what this could have been.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe show had a second season that changed the original formula. George had a redesign making him stronger. Ursula and Magnolia's names were swapped. Magnolia also changed his personality to a more agressive one.
- Crédits fousDuring the initial drum beats at the start of each episode, a heavily edited picture of wildlife (such as an emu with craggy teeth, a frog with lipstick, a vulture with a toupee, etc.) will appear for a split second in the title sequence.
- ConnexionsFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Cartoons That Aged Badly (2000s) (2019)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does George of the Jungle have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant