La suite des premières aventures du célèbre symbologiste de Harvard, Robert Langdon, qui doit resoudre une série d'énigmes lorsque son mentor est kidnappé. La CIA l'oblige à intégrer un grou... Tout lireLa suite des premières aventures du célèbre symbologiste de Harvard, Robert Langdon, qui doit resoudre une série d'énigmes lorsque son mentor est kidnappé. La CIA l'oblige à intégrer un groupe de travail où il découvre un complot.La suite des premières aventures du célèbre symbologiste de Harvard, Robert Langdon, qui doit resoudre une série d'énigmes lorsque son mentor est kidnappé. La CIA l'oblige à intégrer un groupe de travail où il découvre un complot.
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
There's a good amount of intrigue mixed with a bit of WTF? Just one note for NBC/Universal: THERE SHOULD NOT BE AN APOSTROPHE IN "It's cryptic text..."! The opening frame of the show, and somebody needs an editor.
I was so looking forward to this , and i am so disappointed , Acting off, Eddie Izzards cut off hand is so fake that a child could have done it better , and most characters just feel off , except the night guard , he is spot on.
I've read all of the books, and all but Origins more than once. Yes, the books are fast paced, as are the movies made so far. It's refreshing that they've slowed it down a bit. The decision to have a younger Langdon works for me as it gives us the opportunity to see him at a time where he's still learning, that he doesn't have all the answers at the drop of a hat. Every profession requires time to "catch on". I personally don't see a political agenda. That's usually for those that are looking for one or complain because something doesn't align with THEIR beliefs, aka confirmation bias.
It's a work of fiction with some factual information and places thrown in ; some of them even tweaked to tell a fictional story.
What makes me laugh are those who do not like the books but they still watch the show and the movies. WHY????. Oh, just to have something to get on the ole soapbox and whine and cry about it. I get it if you love the book but not the show (Ive felt that way about many Stephen King adaptations) but, come on.
It's a work of fiction with some factual information and places thrown in ; some of them even tweaked to tell a fictional story.
What makes me laugh are those who do not like the books but they still watch the show and the movies. WHY????. Oh, just to have something to get on the ole soapbox and whine and cry about it. I get it if you love the book but not the show (Ive felt that way about many Stephen King adaptations) but, come on.
It's almost offensive how bad the acting is. These actors are giving us the least amount of effort possible. I feel like I'm watching a high school play where I suppose we should just be amazed they memorized the lines. Zero chemistry between actors. Zero suspense. Scenes are shot like absolutely no attempt was made to elicit an emotional response from viewers. Bland. Formulaic. Predictable. Saved By The Bell demonstrated more gripping storylines. If you enjoy this show, good, I'm glad you get something out of it. But I'm terribly sorry that you need your mysteries spoon fed to you by a D-Grade cast and crew who are completely out of their depth.
The thing about dan browns books is the pacing . This attempt to do something with Dan Browns world of mysteries and symbolism in a 1 hour show gives us a cheap feeling unrealistic bore .
I would watch this if you like MacGyver , or Relic Hunter et al.
Think of when you popular premium clothing brands end up being sold at walmart . Get my drift.
I would watch this if you like MacGyver , or Relic Hunter et al.
Think of when you popular premium clothing brands end up being sold at walmart . Get my drift.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesBased on 'The Lost Symbol', Dan Brown's third book in his Robert Langdon series. Sony planned to adapt the book as the third movie in the movie franchise early in the 2010s, following Da Vinci Code (2006) and Anges & Démons (2009). However, production of that adaptation became too complicated as Ron Howard preferred to only produce it rather than directing, and Tom Hanks would not be returning as Professor Robert Langdon. In the end, the production took so long that the novel 'Inferno' was released in 2013, and Sony decided to skip 'The Lost Symbol' and make Inferno (2016) instead, for which most of the crew of the previous films returned, including Howard as director and Hanks as the main character. Because the series is a prequel to the movies, Hanks was replaced as the younger Langdon with Ashley Zukerman, but Brown, Howard and franchise producer Brian Grazer have remained on board as executive producers.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does The Lost Symbol have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for The Lost Symbol (2021)?
Répondre