Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langue"American Confederate" follows a group of Confederate cavalry, and a group of Union (Federal) cavalry, from late 1862 until the end of the Civil War in 1865."American Confederate" follows a group of Confederate cavalry, and a group of Union (Federal) cavalry, from late 1862 until the end of the Civil War in 1865."American Confederate" follows a group of Confederate cavalry, and a group of Union (Federal) cavalry, from late 1862 until the end of the Civil War in 1865.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
Oh my goodness some of the worst acting I have seen in a long time...Oh Lordy the dialog was just awful...This truly the worst movie ever...terrible..just terrible..
I have rarely seen such poor acting, with dense text from a third-rate play. I still can't believe Parker Stevenson wanted to work on this film. Wast of Money and Time.
If you are looking for a main-stream movie based around the Civil War, and don't check the reviews first, you can expect to be seriously disappointed.
"How far can I throw this disk" disappointed.. It has the feel of a home movie produced by Civil War re-enactors. Costumes are generally pretty good, and the period equipment, at least to my eye, seems authentic and researched.
But it's in the actual 'Movie Making' that this production falls flat on it's face.
You kind of get the feeling that the entire crew would get a buzz every time they hear that someone actually bought a copy.
Apart from one or two exceptions, the bulk of the cast appear to have no acting experience whatso-ever, and those one or two exceptions manage to make the 'Bulk' seem even less skilled by comparison.
The film quality is as under-whelming as the performances and there is a clear absence of resource when it comes to just about every 'Behind the Camera' aspect required to make a movie.
That said, we need to keep things in perspective.
This isn't a Hollywood blockbuster.
I imagine the invoice for one day's supply of coffee for such a movie would dwarf the entire production budget of this endeavour.
It gives the impression of being made by a bunch of guys with a passion for the history, but absolutely no movie-making experience, and a budget equal to what they collectively found down the back of the sofa.
But at least they went out there and made one.
What did I do today?
Not much by comparison.
"How far can I throw this disk" disappointed.. It has the feel of a home movie produced by Civil War re-enactors. Costumes are generally pretty good, and the period equipment, at least to my eye, seems authentic and researched.
But it's in the actual 'Movie Making' that this production falls flat on it's face.
You kind of get the feeling that the entire crew would get a buzz every time they hear that someone actually bought a copy.
Apart from one or two exceptions, the bulk of the cast appear to have no acting experience whatso-ever, and those one or two exceptions manage to make the 'Bulk' seem even less skilled by comparison.
The film quality is as under-whelming as the performances and there is a clear absence of resource when it comes to just about every 'Behind the Camera' aspect required to make a movie.
That said, we need to keep things in perspective.
This isn't a Hollywood blockbuster.
I imagine the invoice for one day's supply of coffee for such a movie would dwarf the entire production budget of this endeavour.
It gives the impression of being made by a bunch of guys with a passion for the history, but absolutely no movie-making experience, and a budget equal to what they collectively found down the back of the sofa.
But at least they went out there and made one.
What did I do today?
Not much by comparison.
It's like watching a community play filmed by someone's nephew with a video camera. Terrible edits, flubbed lines and flat deliveries. Parker Stevenson as General Sherman? And one totally unexpected graphic, violent death. Don't bother.
Over the years I have watched a good number of war movies, incl. Civil War flicks like Gettysburg, Glory, Andersonville, The Blue and the Gray etc. This is absolutely at the bottom of the pile, and I gave it a one. Please, Mr. Forbes, producers, and most of the actors, with all due respect find a new line of work, maybe anime, but not pseudo reality. The other review I read I agree with, about the bullet wound, lame field hospital, etc. I noticed over 3 campaigns and a couple or more years the surgeon's apron never changed, same exact blood spatter. And a couple tents? No other personnel? I mean really? Couldn't you get some reenactors to volunteer on a low budget film? The actors just kind of recited their lines. In one scene 4 or 5 soldiers all had identical appearing wounds/blood on their heads. Seemed hoakie. Some of the cinematography/ special takes were really lame. I forced myself to watch most it, just to see how bad it would get. Luckily it was on my computer so I fast forwarded so as not to waste an inordinate amount of time. Avoid this movie and get one of the above mentioned ones or anything else, should be better. Please don't try any more war movies.
Le saviez-vous
- GaffesThe field hospital shown never moves, the tents and landscape around it are the exact same in various scenes, but they're suppose to be in Gettysburg and Atlanta, over a year and several states apart.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Ameerika Konföderatsioon
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 1 700 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée
- 1h 37min(97 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant