Dans un futur inexploré, deux âmes endurcies se rencontrent et s'affrontent avec ce qu'elles ont fait et ce qu'elles sont devenues.Dans un futur inexploré, deux âmes endurcies se rencontrent et s'affrontent avec ce qu'elles ont fait et ce qu'elles sont devenues.Dans un futur inexploré, deux âmes endurcies se rencontrent et s'affrontent avec ce qu'elles ont fait et ce qu'elles sont devenues.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Avis à la une
Saw this at the wonderful Sun Theatre in Yarraville. The highlight was the movie being introduced by Ivan and Hugo. I really wanted to like it because they were both great but... I didn't.
I enjoyed the Hong Kong backdrop and most of the visuals and sound but really didn't dig the story (or lack of).
Ivan indicated that he did everything when he made this movie, maybe he should get some outside input in his next project.
I left the movie confused.
I enjoyed the Hong Kong backdrop and most of the visuals and sound but really didn't dig the story (or lack of).
Ivan indicated that he did everything when he made this movie, maybe he should get some outside input in his next project.
I left the movie confused.
Honestly I didn't mind watching this film, but with the talent he had and the clearly substantial budget, it was unfortunate in many ways. Aside from the almost painfully unoriginal nature of the story, I just kept thinking one thought over and over. A middle-aged man, a young beautiful woman and an older man. How many times have I seen this same scenario? Too many.
It's an ambitious task producing a science fiction movie on an obviously low budget, especially if the content focuses on condition rather than plot.
The movie's cinematography is well worth watching, also editing is well made, but without a straight plot, scripting has to carry a heavy load because every scene has to stand for itself. Unfortunately, it doesn't hold up to the task. Though the dialogues seek philosophical depth, they lack refinement, constantly throwing me out of the suspension of disbelief.
Acting is just fine, including that of Ryan Kwanten who plays the lead role of Jack. However, his sloppy diction is hard to take. Eager to be as authentic as possible, he sacrifices his control over speech which makes him simply hard to understand.
Also, there are too many references to "Blade Runner": A lonesome killer seeking love, voiceover narration, androids, the lifespan issue, an Asian future city, even the soundtrack that sounds like Vangelis at times - there are just too many parallels.
Great Hong Kong footage, good editing, but overall an overambitious undertaking.
The movie's cinematography is well worth watching, also editing is well made, but without a straight plot, scripting has to carry a heavy load because every scene has to stand for itself. Unfortunately, it doesn't hold up to the task. Though the dialogues seek philosophical depth, they lack refinement, constantly throwing me out of the suspension of disbelief.
Acting is just fine, including that of Ryan Kwanten who plays the lead role of Jack. However, his sloppy diction is hard to take. Eager to be as authentic as possible, he sacrifices his control over speech which makes him simply hard to understand.
Also, there are too many references to "Blade Runner": A lonesome killer seeking love, voiceover narration, androids, the lifespan issue, an Asian future city, even the soundtrack that sounds like Vangelis at times - there are just too many parallels.
Great Hong Kong footage, good editing, but overall an overambitious undertaking.
Talk about slow, drawn out and extremely boring. It took 1hr 17mins for me to understand what the hell this movie was even about. My interest in watching was because of Hugo Weaving and he barely had any camera time. If you need something to put you to sleep with a decent score, then watch Expire. Your eyes will "expire" in no time.....sheesh louise.
Started watching this tonight, I've been playing with my phone for the last forty mins. The films nearly finished. Not really got a clue what its about. Don't really care!
Immensely annoying start, the lead characters voice over is barely audible. They should have used subtitles. This film really wants to be blade runner, shame they couldn't afford the constant rain (they should have shot it in England).
I've given it three stars cause the lady was attractive.. if the lead guy could have spoke properly i might have gone to four.
Really though, this film is a waste of time. Mine anyway.
Immensely annoying start, the lead characters voice over is barely audible. They should have used subtitles. This film really wants to be blade runner, shame they couldn't afford the constant rain (they should have shot it in England).
I've given it three stars cause the lady was attractive.. if the lead guy could have spoke properly i might have gone to four.
Really though, this film is a waste of time. Mine anyway.
Le saviez-vous
- ConnexionsReferences Blade Runner (1982)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Expired?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 27 150 $US
- Durée
- 1h 42min(102 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant