NOTE IMDb
6,4/10
5,8 k
MA NOTE
C'est ce que tous les parents redoutent : leur enfant ne rentre pas à la maison à l'heure prévue. Lorsque Rachel Barber, ne descend pas du tramway pour rejoindre son père, Elizabeth, sa mère... Tout lireC'est ce que tous les parents redoutent : leur enfant ne rentre pas à la maison à l'heure prévue. Lorsque Rachel Barber, ne descend pas du tramway pour rejoindre son père, Elizabeth, sa mère, et Mike, son père, se précipitent.C'est ce que tous les parents redoutent : leur enfant ne rentre pas à la maison à l'heure prévue. Lorsque Rachel Barber, ne descend pas du tramway pour rejoindre son père, Elizabeth, sa mère, et Mike, son père, se précipitent.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires au total
Avis à la une
Anyone whose child has gone missing, even momentarily, will connect with the earliest moments of this version of true events, but, perhaps only those for whom the loss remains unresolved for any serious length of time will know how close to their reality this film touches. It is almost relentlessly tough to watch because there is no place for pressure to be relieved, however briefly, by a joke, a glimmer of hope, a slither of a flaw to make us remember we are watching a dramatised version of events. I even find it tough to judge the quality of the acting because too often this film seems so vividly, so uncomfortably, and so chillingly real. I am, if truth be told, just in awe of all the performances I have witnessed and I still have to pinch myself to remember it was "just a film". Is that a compliment?
I felt tears on my cheeks three times during this film, not because I was sad, but because my being had to have an outlet and I couldn't laugh or smile. The emptiness, pointlessness, coldness, loneliness of a missing loved one is so bitingly portrayed and yet saying "okay that's enough, I have got your point" is as futile as the parents of Rachel Barber shouting "Rachel come home" on every street corner they could.
I remember Hitchcock being heavily criticised by some in the industry for a seven minute killing sequence in "Torn Curtain" when that was easier to justify because it was a work of fiction and a thriller rather than "a week or so in the real life of a family". And so I had mixed feelings about "I Am You" when I reflected on some of the things I had seen, including the closing statements popular with "factual" drama.
I am left with these mixed feelings ranging from the reality of the acting to the old adage that imagination is always more powerful than a picture, from the top to the bottom of the things I should feel. And ultimately I cannot give this film a points score because it doesn't feel like it entered the cinematic league stakes. It is a film and if you see it you will feel what it does to you rather than want to talk about to friends. And that IS tough.
I felt tears on my cheeks three times during this film, not because I was sad, but because my being had to have an outlet and I couldn't laugh or smile. The emptiness, pointlessness, coldness, loneliness of a missing loved one is so bitingly portrayed and yet saying "okay that's enough, I have got your point" is as futile as the parents of Rachel Barber shouting "Rachel come home" on every street corner they could.
I remember Hitchcock being heavily criticised by some in the industry for a seven minute killing sequence in "Torn Curtain" when that was easier to justify because it was a work of fiction and a thriller rather than "a week or so in the real life of a family". And so I had mixed feelings about "I Am You" when I reflected on some of the things I had seen, including the closing statements popular with "factual" drama.
I am left with these mixed feelings ranging from the reality of the acting to the old adage that imagination is always more powerful than a picture, from the top to the bottom of the things I should feel. And ultimately I cannot give this film a points score because it doesn't feel like it entered the cinematic league stakes. It is a film and if you see it you will feel what it does to you rather than want to talk about to friends. And that IS tough.
I absolutely loved this film. I was totally gripped start to finish.
The mix of surreal camera work and character chapters made the horrific subject matter all then more intense and difficult to deal with, as it should be. The story itself suited the surreal elements that reflected the characters states of mind. All of these mixed elements create a bizarre world inside a real one, which enables the viewer to, to some extent, empathize and imagine the kind of horrors that the people these characters are based on must gone through.
Ruth Bradley, who plays Caroline is absolutely astonishing. She switches between creating terror or sympathy and is nothing short of completely convincing.
The mix of surreal camera work and character chapters made the horrific subject matter all then more intense and difficult to deal with, as it should be. The story itself suited the surreal elements that reflected the characters states of mind. All of these mixed elements create a bizarre world inside a real one, which enables the viewer to, to some extent, empathize and imagine the kind of horrors that the people these characters are based on must gone through.
Ruth Bradley, who plays Caroline is absolutely astonishing. She switches between creating terror or sympathy and is nothing short of completely convincing.
This a powerful movie with a long lasting impression. I think Simone did a fantastic job with this story. She kept to the actual events of what happened to Rachel, her family, friends as well as Caroline without glorifying it, sugar coating it and hollywoodising it. It is real and it is raw. This is what happened and this is how the people involved experienced it. The acting is fantastic, the way the scenes flow and the cinematography is excellent. Along with the true story there are messages to take from it, one being involved and recognizing mental illness, as we know is a massive and growing problem in the community.
The title it played in Germany at the Fantasy Filmfest. A very strange little movie, that is very dark and will very likely appall a lot of people (if they don't know what they're in for especially), because of it's theme, but also because of it's graphic nature (at times, not that often, but still quite disturbing).
The actors involved in here are all good, Guy Pearce giving a better performance (there must be a better script at hand I reckon) than in "Don't be afraid of the Dark". One of our lead actresses has to go to really tough places and she manages to do so very convincingly. Not for everyone and I'm not sure "enjoy" would be the right word to use after watching it, but this is a really good work of art!
The actors involved in here are all good, Guy Pearce giving a better performance (there must be a better script at hand I reckon) than in "Don't be afraid of the Dark". One of our lead actresses has to go to really tough places and she manages to do so very convincingly. Not for everyone and I'm not sure "enjoy" would be the right word to use after watching it, but this is a really good work of art!
Knowing this is based on a true tragedy it's difficult to know how to rate a film so graphically depicting the initial terror of a beautiful teenage girl's disappearance, and consequent portrayal of her murder, including a detailed representation of the perpetrator's state of mind and mentally disturbed motive. To that end, Ruth Bradley as Caroline Reid is a standout.
Notwithstanding the perfectly understated performances by several high profile leads and noteworthy cameos, not to mention the quality of production, one still ponders what purpose such a heart wrenching movie serves. One such moment occurs when the still missing Rachel Barber's death dawns on her father, played by Guy Pearce, inducing a panic attack. Another when Caroline Reid's own mother (Rebecca Gibney) exclaims 'she's always been horrible'.
There is nothing uplifting about this film. As a parent it is the ultimate nightmare. Yet In Her Skin is compelling all the same.
Perhaps the value is recognizing that ignoring the Caroline Reid's of this world comes at society's peril. And whilst the bulk of sympathy naturally lay with the murdered teenager's parents, the sense of helplessness and horror experienced by the perpetrator's parents is also a terrible burden to carry.
Notwithstanding the perfectly understated performances by several high profile leads and noteworthy cameos, not to mention the quality of production, one still ponders what purpose such a heart wrenching movie serves. One such moment occurs when the still missing Rachel Barber's death dawns on her father, played by Guy Pearce, inducing a panic attack. Another when Caroline Reid's own mother (Rebecca Gibney) exclaims 'she's always been horrible'.
There is nothing uplifting about this film. As a parent it is the ultimate nightmare. Yet In Her Skin is compelling all the same.
Perhaps the value is recognizing that ignoring the Caroline Reid's of this world comes at society's peril. And whilst the bulk of sympathy naturally lay with the murdered teenager's parents, the sense of helplessness and horror experienced by the perpetrator's parents is also a terrible burden to carry.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe film was re-cut by the international distributor, Reliant Pictures International, without informing the filmmakers. The film's producers objected to this because it broke contractual obligations to the Barbers. Also, since the story is true, the re-cut was defamatory.
- GaffesThe movie never shows how Caroline got Rachel's body to the Kilmore farm. Caroline kept Rachel's body in her apartment for two days, then wrapped it in two rugs and took it by taxi to her father's Kilmore farm. Caroline told the taxi driver that she was moving a statue. She then buried Rachel's body in a shallow grave.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is In Her Skin?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 47min(107 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant