Loose Change: Final Cut

You must watch this documentary. Also google video 'alex jones: end game'

You don't need to completely believe everything suggested in it, i didn't, but it raised enough logical questions for me to to be sure there is something 'rotten in denmark'. You cannot escape that - as the film states - it wants you to do your own research, ask questions.... When was the last time you heard any other media institution or government official represent itself so modestly?

I congratulate Dylan Avery and the team making this documentary. It has helped open my eyes to the truth, i hope it does the same for you....

I've seen the first two versions of LooseChange and I loved them dearly. The fairest factual question about this film, I think, is: "whose conspiracy theory do you believe, the governments or this one?" I hope you enjoy it as much as I did!

The most compelling evidence, so far, has been the molten metal and the plane/missle hit on the pentagon. I don't think the debunkers have come close to explaining how jet fuel can melt metal in the basement or how a plane can hit the pentagon without leaving plane engines or wings laying around.

Overall, I think the movies have been very professional and fair.

I think its very unfair for people to give bad ratings to this movie without even watching it, a lot of heat Loose Change gets is centred around the original film and the second edition.

It's true that Loose Change 2nd edition and the original film did contain inaccurate information, and have been debunked in many areas. Which is precisely why this film had to be made.

For people who were put off by the first two films, you shouldn't be so quick to judge Loose change final cut, it really is completely different film and approach to 9/11 truth. Loose Change Final Cut doesn't jump to wild conclusions like the previous editions, it states only facts and then leaves the viewer to decide.

I'm not necessarily a truther, but I do like to give all 9/11 documentaries a fair chance and this one has delivered IMO.

Watch the movie and decide for yourself.

Its one of those movies that I admit is kinda biased but he truly believes this so therefore would be hard for him not to be biased but makes you think that USA might have known at the least if not did it. I actually didn't hear of this movie until last night when I watched 9/11 conspiracy's show on cbc and they mentioned it. One big point is Bulding 7 that they didn't mention about the attacks and I believe that is was a controlled explosion like come on fire cant burn down a steel building in 7 hours and it wouldn't collapse straight down. Everybody else please respect my opinion and I will respect yours, Just my opinion on the issue.

I watched the first part of this before my Interwebs died on me, but it was enough to get a distinct feel that it is much different than the previous 2 versions. I have also watched Screw Loose Change, and perused other sites dedicated to debunking the film(s). Now, my official stance on 9/11 is that something stinks, and everyone knows it only some people are unwilling to admit it. Also there is no such thing as a 9/11 Denier as that is a logical fallacy and an ad hominem attack used in an attempt to discredit anyone who's opinion and perspective is different from those who believe the events as they were presented by the main stream media. The purpose of Loose Change: Final Cut is to open peoples eyes to a possible truth, and to raise questions that need to be answered. This it does using new footage, and new information that the previous films did not have, and by removing information that wasn't sound as any decent film maker should do.

The movie should be seen by everyone if only so that everyone has a chance to see that there are problems with the official story. The film might be biased in one direction, but that doesn't mean it doesn't merit a once over since it's not the same as the first two.