Une version du classique de l'horreur de 1987 de Clive Barker où une jeune femme aux prises avec une dépendance entre en possession d'une ancienne boîte de puzzle, ignorant que son but est d... Tout lireUne version du classique de l'horreur de 1987 de Clive Barker où une jeune femme aux prises avec une dépendance entre en possession d'une ancienne boîte de puzzle, ignorant que son but est d'invoquer les Cénobites.Une version du classique de l'horreur de 1987 de Clive Barker où une jeune femme aux prises avec une dépendance entre en possession d'une ancienne boîte de puzzle, ignorant que son but est d'invoquer les Cénobites.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire et 9 nominations au total
- Riley
- (as Odessa A’zion)
- Orderly
- (as Greg Decuir)
Résumé
Avis à la une
Following the release of Hellraiser: Bloodline, Clive Barker remained uninvolved with the series as it continued in a streak of direct-to-video installments legendarily known for taking unrelated scripts and reverse engineering them by inserting Pinhead. Barker announced in 2006 following the release of Hellworld his intent on remaking the series with rightsholder Dimension films. The remake went through a revolving door of directors and writers to the point that two obligation sequels, 2011's Hellraiser: Revelations and 2018's Hellraiser: Judgment were rushed into production just so Dimension wouldn't relinquish the rights. Following the collapse of the Dimesnion's parent company The Weinstein Company, Spyglass Media acquired the remake rights with Barker producing alongside David S. Goyer who would write the initial treatment. David Brucker, director of well regarded horror films The Ritual and The Night House became attached to direct with Bruckner's writers on Night House Ben Collins and Luke Piotrowski coming aboard as well. Now dropping on Hulu just in time for Halloween, Hellraiser breathes new life into this long neglected franchise and makes it the best incarnation we've seen since at least Hellbound: Hellraiser II.
Odessa A'Zion is really solid in the lead role of Riley and while the character is a little abrasive upon first introduction, I feel the movie really understands that cycle of addiction that becomes hard to break out of and Riley's addiction is a massive part of what makes this movie work as it's well integrated with the Hellraiser Iconography as Riley's obsession and repeated usage of the Lament Configuration much like her addiction leads to pain and suffering of those around her be they casual contacts, friends, or loved ones and while Riley doesn't want to hurt anyone, her drive to find her brother follows the same mindset in finding her next "fix" where she finds herself indifferent or uncaring of the consequences and only able to focus on that immediate gratification of her obsessive drive. Jamie Clayton takes on the mantle of Doug Bradley in the role of Pinhead (aka The Priest) and Clayton is phenomenal in the role as she captures the cold look and feel we associate with the character but is still allowed to make it her own.
The art direction in this movie is fantastic. While the original Hellraiser's cenobites have ingrained themselves in popular consciousness for good reason with distinct looks, this new Hellraiser keeps the same general idea of the Cenobites but goes some unique directions. For one thing unlike the original Cenobites who sported dark black leather attire, the only thing on the Cenobites this time around is skin, but the skin has been mangled, mutilated, and twisted so it's now arranged similar to the outfits of the original film but it's a nice way of giving visual distinction, so it doesn't just copy the aesthetics of the original film. The movie also features a wonderfully designed manor house belonging to Roland Voight and it's a sight to behold as it is based heavily around the designs of the Lament Configuration and is wonderfully used in the climax. The one thing that keeps this movie from being as good as the first Hellraiser in my opinion is in its usage of the character of Roland Voight. While Voight is given a great introduction in the opening sequence, he's unfortunately absent for a good chunk of the movie and this does a disservice to the film in my opinion because it forces Pinhead to take more of a role in the antagonist part of the story than should be necessary. Now it doesn't go to the level of Hellraiser III where it jumped off a cliff and made Pinhead a borderline Freddy Kruger clone, but the best Hellraiser films keep Pinhead in a supporting capacity and they mostly do that here but not as much as they should. Personally I feel the movie would've benefitted from seeing Voight as much as we saw Frank Cotton in the original film, but it's not a deal breaker and Pinhead isn't made the made antagonist so the movie does understand where Pinhead's role in this story should be.
Hellraiser is a welcome reboot of this legacied horror series and is easily my second favorite of this series behind the original. Anchored with strong performances by A'zion and Clayton, the movie gives you everything you want from a Hellraiser story with some disgustingly good Cenobite designs and kill sequences along with truly epic sequences that feel like expansions on the Hellbound environments. While Goran Visnjic is good as Voight, I feel he is underutilized, and the movie could've been improved from having him be a more prominent part of the story. Overall if this is the launch point for a new series of Hellraiser movies, then let them flow forth like the blood and viscera in the kill scenes.
The opening prologue is promising enough. Then the movie takes us to our lead characters. Unfortunately, this is where the movie's weaknesses start presenting themselves. When you start a movie like this with characters already in turmoil, there isn't really anywhere to go in terms of putting them through more. They say never to show your top in a performance, because then you've got nowhere to go but down. Maybe these filmmakers didn't realize that starting characters near rock bottom and already at each other's throats is a bad idea too. Remember Kirsty's transformation over the course of the first film? She went from being a happy young adult to a woman fighting for her life in the worst circumstances possible. Well, there'll be none of that here. Riley is a recovering addict and, even if she's sober, her brother second-guesses everything she says. We won't get the destruction of a family dynamic this time because it's already a shambles.
Then the puzzle box comes in. Without getting into specifics, I'll say that the way it works on the Cenobites' victims is totally different now. As to the Cenobites, the code by which they operate is far less respectable. Granted, they weren't the noblest characters before, but they also didn't go around killing innocents just because they could. Here, their role is little more than standard slasher villainy. It's a great reduction in quality to the terrifying, yet elegant manner in which they were presented before. There used to be a grotesque beauty and a logic to how they operated. "Hands do not call us. Desire does." You can forget all about that. Here, they don't care who they take because they've got to take someone. Yay. They're no longer interesting.
As often happens, there's also human villainy afoot. Unfortunately, our human antagonist is given so little time in the movie that his storyline seems largely unrelated to what we've been watching with Riley. His ending is unearned and feels obligatory. We can't get any kind of enjoyment from a story that feels like it's only an outline shoehorned into another plot to give it more material. There's also an aspect of this character's interactions with the Cenobites that is meant to be disturbing, but it's so overexposed that it just gets ridiculous. Part of horror movies is knowing how much to show. This element was given way too much screen time and almost looks like parody after a certain point. When it's first introduced, it works. When you're given time to look at and study it, it falls flat on its face.
At the end of the day, it's not the worst Hellraiser movie I've seen, but it's only marginally better than the direct-to-DVD sequels. The characters aren't interesting and the plot is a betrayal of the basic tenets established in the original films' lore. You're free to do whatever you want in a reboot, but whoever changed the box and the Cenobites seems to have misunderstood what made these movies unique in the horror realm. For that matter, the human characters betray that fact too.
The main thing I got from this movie was a desire to rewatch the originals. I think I will.
The source material being the same we wouldn't expect much new .
Where this outing fails is to raise the bar on what made the original so good.
The tension and build up is ok but I felt disappointed with the costumes. To me the heavy layered latex looked like heavy layered latex. The original was a darker filmed movie and the Cenobites were so disturbing the first time you see them . In this newer version we have a wider field of view shot further away and it looses its claustrophobic feel . Escaping seems easier and that drives the tension down.
So different cinematography and poor customers and such take away .
The good is the protagonist the actor does a good job portraying seemly troubled youth .
Act 3 has a bit of a twist but comes too late in the film to save it.
Some of the ideas, even if borrowed, were convincing : the mansion, the dumb rules, the drug allegory. And some true Hellraiser concepts and visuals like the Leviathan moment were particularly well done but no spoilers here.
The most disappointing was probably the Cenobites design way too elegant and Alien like, not gruesome or surreal enough. Plus the characters deaths felt like generic gory horror à la SAW or Escape Room. It was missing a sense of spectacle and boldness despite having clearly a decent budget.
Still an enjoyable movie.
It's a shame that studio executives completely disregard fans and the original source material, when ever considering to remake, or reboot a title. It's not shocking either to see Disney is going doing a terrible rabbithole in ruining classic titles. At this stage it's best to simply watch the first two Hellraisers, Hellraise 3 and 4 are moderately decent sequels. Anything beyond this point was a simple cash-grab or purposefully made to retain the title by the studio so it wouldn't expire.
Keep away. 0 / 10.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesDoug Bradley, who originated the role of the Hell Priest/Lead Cenobite/Pinhead, had this to say about Jamie Clayton's take in a Twitter post, "I'm a bit blown away by this! The clever re-design of the make-up; the shimmer of the "pin heads"; the palette; whatever that keyhole/locket/tracheotomy thing is at the throat. It's simple, subtle, disturbing and sexy. Everything it should be. Peace and Pain, Doug."
- GaffesWhen Riley is researching Voight, the results show a list of websites. None of them are valid domain names. This is nothing new for many lower budget films, many of which come up with off-brand search domains as referencing the real ones would be too costly.
- Citations
The Priest: What is it you pray for? What is it you pray for?
Nora: Salvation.
The Priest: And what it'd feel like? A joyful note? Without change, without end? Heaven? There's no music in that.
[the Priest removes a pin from its head...]
Nora: Please...
[... and penetrates Nora's throat with it]
The Priest: But this... there is so much more the body can be made to feel. And you'll feel it all before we're through.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Chris Stuckmann Movie Reviews: Hellraiser (2022) (2022)
- Bandes originalesHellraiser Theme
Written by Christopher Young
Meilleurs choix
- How long is Hellraiser?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 10 303 $US
- Durée2 heures 1 minute
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1