NOTE IMDb
2,6/10
1,2 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueAfter an accident, a government Agent gains the ability of super-speed and goes after an old friend turned Nemesis.After an accident, a government Agent gains the ability of super-speed and goes after an old friend turned Nemesis.After an accident, a government Agent gains the ability of super-speed and goes after an old friend turned Nemesis.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
K.C. Clyde
- Barcroft
- (as KC Clyde)
Kari Hawker-Diaz
- Young Nurse
- (as Keri Hawker)
Avis à la une
This was the worst movie I have seen on sci-fi and they are notorious for producing the worst movies ever.
I cannot believe Stan lee put his name on this but after seeing who wants to be a superhero I now know.
I will start with the plot. Flash meets Darkman nuff said, nothing original. Casting, our lead hero has a comb over and looks like he's pushing 50 plus. The henchman look like no-budget porn extras. And the effects were ridiculous, even the Flash TV series from 16 years ago had better effects. If this was made in the 1950's that would explain the really bad special effects. The story and dialog you can imagine is par with the rest of the production value. Okay the worst thing was our hero's costume, he goes to a sporting goods store and the salesman goes in the back and gets his suit, that's it. And it looks like a costume from a homemade comic book fan movie. I would say I liked the python character until his comical fight scenes.
Watching QVC is more entertaining.
I cannot believe Stan lee put his name on this but after seeing who wants to be a superhero I now know.
I will start with the plot. Flash meets Darkman nuff said, nothing original. Casting, our lead hero has a comb over and looks like he's pushing 50 plus. The henchman look like no-budget porn extras. And the effects were ridiculous, even the Flash TV series from 16 years ago had better effects. If this was made in the 1950's that would explain the really bad special effects. The story and dialog you can imagine is par with the rest of the production value. Okay the worst thing was our hero's costume, he goes to a sporting goods store and the salesman goes in the back and gets his suit, that's it. And it looks like a costume from a homemade comic book fan movie. I would say I liked the python character until his comical fight scenes.
Watching QVC is more entertaining.
Well the box looked good, should be a good movie right?
This movie is such a knockoff of The Flash and it is also surprisingly violent.
This is NOT a movie to show children. It is very bloody.
The acting is rather boring except for a few actors.
I was also disappointed in the Lightspeed suit. It was basically a ski speed suit with white markings on it. Blah.
Nothing more than a SciFi made for TV movie.
Skip it.
I'd say rent or buy the old Flash TV series... it's a lot better!
This movie is such a knockoff of The Flash and it is also surprisingly violent.
This is NOT a movie to show children. It is very bloody.
The acting is rather boring except for a few actors.
I was also disappointed in the Lightspeed suit. It was basically a ski speed suit with white markings on it. Blah.
Nothing more than a SciFi made for TV movie.
Skip it.
I'd say rent or buy the old Flash TV series... it's a lot better!
The good news is that the Python makeup is quite good.
Shame that they used up the entire budget on it. If you've been paying attention you will now know:
1. Leading man projects middle age; 2. Lee Majors projects old age; 3. SFX - rubbish; 4. Hero's super costume - truly rubbish; 5. Plot - risible; 6. Dialogue - execrable; 7. Heroine - having been extracted from trouble immediately puts herself right back in it; 8. Acting - at best no better than average. At worst (Python guy) - absolutely awful. And I COULD do better, and I'm no actor; 9. Python's death scene - huh? What happened?
I suppose Nicole Eggert is moderately decorative.
Stan is going to wear out his not inconsiderable goodwill in the comics community if he continue to put his name to drivel like this.
Shame that they used up the entire budget on it. If you've been paying attention you will now know:
1. Leading man projects middle age; 2. Lee Majors projects old age; 3. SFX - rubbish; 4. Hero's super costume - truly rubbish; 5. Plot - risible; 6. Dialogue - execrable; 7. Heroine - having been extracted from trouble immediately puts herself right back in it; 8. Acting - at best no better than average. At worst (Python guy) - absolutely awful. And I COULD do better, and I'm no actor; 9. Python's death scene - huh? What happened?
I suppose Nicole Eggert is moderately decorative.
Stan is going to wear out his not inconsiderable goodwill in the comics community if he continue to put his name to drivel like this.
Stan Lee owes me 90 minutes of my life back. It's a simple story: two men are both changed by experiments and science gone bad. one becomes a snake man and the other develops super speed and a heart problem. Whacky high-jinx ensue.
Here are the problems with the movie:
1) Plot is horrible. The writers borrow plot points directly from Spiderman and The Flash.
2) The acting is even worse, but it's not all the actor's fault: dialogue is laughable. Nicole Eggert and Lee Majors are both in this movie, nuff said.
3) The directing is just bad. There are scenes where a person is talking and the shot does not have their mouth in it, just their forehead and nose, then the camera zooms out and re-frames.
4) There is nothing special about those special effects. The main character wears a ski suite as a costume.
All and all this movie looks and feels much cheaper and cheesier than a made for TV movie (that's saying a lot). It's pretty much like someone bought a camcorder and filmed it on weekends with their buddies.
Here are the problems with the movie:
1) Plot is horrible. The writers borrow plot points directly from Spiderman and The Flash.
2) The acting is even worse, but it's not all the actor's fault: dialogue is laughable. Nicole Eggert and Lee Majors are both in this movie, nuff said.
3) The directing is just bad. There are scenes where a person is talking and the shot does not have their mouth in it, just their forehead and nose, then the camera zooms out and re-frames.
4) There is nothing special about those special effects. The main character wears a ski suite as a costume.
All and all this movie looks and feels much cheaper and cheesier than a made for TV movie (that's saying a lot). It's pretty much like someone bought a camcorder and filmed it on weekends with their buddies.
This is The Great Stan Lee we're talking about so I hesitate to say anything bad. Nonetheless Mr. Lee has decided to do trash for cash. First of all the music throughout the whole film is low grade 80's movie synthesizer. This music is so bad and so distracting it makes your eyes roll. It also sets a tone of b-movie cheapness. Honestly I do love cheapo b-films but you have to be able to laugh at it. Lightspeed tries so hard to take itself seriously but has nothing good or fun to offer. The script is horrible, the acting is a joke and the characters are preposterous. Worst of all, ALL the superhero elements are derived from other comic book characters to create an uninteresting amalgam with no unique abilities. Again, I love Stan Lee and comics and b- movies, but this is one to avoid.
Le saviez-vous
- ConnexionsReferences Casino (1995)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant