Masterchef Goes Large

This progams so dull the australian version much better. They don't make any dishes just plodges and swirls. They need to introduce new challenges like french classics. The presenters are so bad, all greg says is i like sweet i like sweet.

As much as I like Hell's Kitchen and I LOVE Gordo, MCGL is only a 30 minute show that actually shows cooking and feedback...ALL OF THE TIME. There's a lot to be learned if you are novice cooks from the US like myself. The vegetables used in Europe are far different than here as well as the recipes.

My husband would laugh because each episode was so serious and when cooking for Michelin Star chefs who critique their every move even down to fingerprints on the plate. I knew European chefs were extremely serious and my husband just didn't get it, but I did and I recommend the show highly.

One other thing...It was admitted by a producer of a top cooking show in Europe that the TV chefs are marginal cooks with an abundance of personality. This show distinguishes that nicely. You can like Rachel Ray and Jamie Oliver but at the end of the day, wouldn't you like the best plate of food possible. See Gordon Ramsey's restaurants. he is 2006 chef of the year or some title like it. Knocking off Jaime Oliver.

Now I'm hungry....

It's 18 years since Masterchef went large (and they haven't in fact used that tag for about 10). There are now 3 series a year - ordinary Joe, celeb and professional - as well as Christmas specials. It's no wonder that people are starting to get a bit tired of it. Since they never tell you the ratings these days I infer this fact, besides my own feelings, from the format tweaks this year and the fact it has been moved back down from 9pm to 8pm. Inexplicably, BBC producers seem to have got the idea that the way to revive their ageing cookery contests is to have irritating, unqualified people sticking their oar in. In Great British Menu it's the excruciating Andi Oliver, now in Masterchef you have one lot of contestants looking on and cheering another lot. Yay!

There's nothing much wrong with the show, and certainly not the presenters: they're the ones who have made it a massive success with spin-offs in Australia and the US. They're personable, and have the unusual but crucial skill of being able to describe a dish in a few words, in such a way that the viewer can imagine what it's like to eat. Much as I love Gordon Ramsay he, for example, cannot do that.

It's simply that too much has been asked of the show. In the BBC's dearth of new prime-time ideas, it has been promoted above its level. What is needed is not little faffy tweaks, but for us all to have a bit of a break from it. Failing that: at least go back to shorter episodes.

It cant get any more stiff. Or isher than this.

I wonder what it is with the companies over there, that make movie or episodes , what actually make these productions feels so dead ?!

Compare this with Masterchef US or Austrailia , And then have to remind my self that it is Masterchef showing.

But its a No No!

So stiff, So boooring. No good atmospehere, no nothing.

Its a shame that the uk are allowed to use the name Masterchef in these productions.

I can go on, its the same with the movies. Stiff!

3th time is the conclusion.

The one statement that famously sums up Gregg Wallaces contribution to this programme was when he criticised a contestant for their Rendang not being crispy enough........ fork me, he's obviously never eaten real Rendang!

John Torode is clearly way more professional but unfortunately he also sometimes has a prissy, smug irritating presence about him, especially when he puts a spoonful of food into his mouth.... sorry, but it's true, it's just teeth grindingly annoying at times for some unknown reason!

Don't / can't watch it anymore...... bring back Gordon Ramsey, or any of the former hosts!