[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Cell Phone

Titre original : Cell
  • 2016
  • 16
  • 1h 38min
NOTE IMDb
4,4/10
32 k
MA NOTE
John Cusack and Samuel L. Jackson in Cell Phone (2016)
At the Boston airport, Clay witnesses a scene of chaotic mayhem when an electronic signal turns hundreds of cell phone users into rabid killers. Desperate to find his estranged wife and son, Clay teams with a train driver to battle the horde of murderous "phoners" as the city descends into apocalyptic madness.
Lire trailer2:31
4 Videos
48 photos
Horreur zombieScience-fiction dystopiqueActionAventureHorreurScience-fictionThriller

Samuel L. Jackson et John Cusack prennent les armes dans ce thriller apocalyptique de Stephen King sur un mystérieux signal qui reprogramme l'esprit des utilisateurs de téléphones portables ... Tout lireSamuel L. Jackson et John Cusack prennent les armes dans ce thriller apocalyptique de Stephen King sur un mystérieux signal qui reprogramme l'esprit des utilisateurs de téléphones portables dans le monde entier.Samuel L. Jackson et John Cusack prennent les armes dans ce thriller apocalyptique de Stephen King sur un mystérieux signal qui reprogramme l'esprit des utilisateurs de téléphones portables dans le monde entier.

  • Réalisation
    • Tod Williams
  • Scénario
    • Stephen King
    • Adam Alleca
  • Casting principal
    • John Cusack
    • Samuel L. Jackson
    • Isabelle Fuhrman
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    4,4/10
    32 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Tod Williams
    • Scénario
      • Stephen King
      • Adam Alleca
    • Casting principal
      • John Cusack
      • Samuel L. Jackson
      • Isabelle Fuhrman
    • 345avis d'utilisateurs
    • 142avis des critiques
    • 38Métascore
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Vidéos4

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:31
    Official Trailer
    Cell: Airport Outbreak
    Clip 1:49
    Cell: Airport Outbreak
    Cell: Airport Outbreak
    Clip 1:49
    Cell: Airport Outbreak
    Cell: Meeting Alice
    Clip 1:53
    Cell: Meeting Alice
    Cell: Middle Of The Night
    Clip 0:35
    Cell: Middle Of The Night

    Photos47

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 42
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux99+

    Modifier
    John Cusack
    John Cusack
    • Clay Riddell
    Samuel L. Jackson
    Samuel L. Jackson
    • Tom McCourt
    Isabelle Fuhrman
    Isabelle Fuhrman
    • Alice Waxman
    Clark Sarullo
    Clark Sarullo
    • Sharon Riddell
    Ethan Andrew Casto
    Ethan Andrew Casto
    • Johnny Riddell
    Owen Teague
    Owen Teague
    • Jordan
    Stacy Keach
    Stacy Keach
    • Charles Ardai
    Joshua Mikel
    Joshua Mikel
    • Raggedy
    Anthony Reynolds
    Anthony Reynolds
    • Ray
    Erin Elizabeth Burns
    Erin Elizabeth Burns
    • Denise
    Jeffrey Lee Hallman
    Jeffrey Lee Hallman
    • Hog Tied Man
    • (as Jeffrey Hallman)
    Mark Ashworth
    Mark Ashworth
    • Bartender
    Wilbur Fitzgerald
    Wilbur Fitzgerald
    • Geoff
    Catherine Dyer
    Catherine Dyer
    • Sally
    E. Roger Mitchell
    E. Roger Mitchell
    • Roscoe
    Alex ter Avest
    Alex ter Avest
    • Chloe
    Gaby Leyner
    Gaby Leyner
    • Maddy
    Rey Hernandez
    Rey Hernandez
    • Cop (Rick)
    • Réalisation
      • Tod Williams
    • Scénario
      • Stephen King
      • Adam Alleca
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs345

    4,432.2K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    6shaddixauth

    Disappointed Book Reader

    When I first read Cell many years ago, I instantly thought it could be transferred to an amazing movie. (And funnily enough, even cast the same actors in my eyes for both Clay and Tom.)

    However, the final product for the big screen was such a let down.. Though the scenes they took from the book were fairly accurate, they cut out at least 40% of the content. (Most of which is integral to the story telling and explaining what has actually happened.. The Raggedy Man / Red Hoodie Guy being one major oversight.)

    I feel like if you hadn't read the book to begin with, you'll probably find yourself getting lost too easily.. There was a severe lack of pacing simply jumping from scene to scene and some changes which in my opinion were for the worst.

    Overall I did still enjoy the movie, has a fairly unique concept and some very disturbing imagery, but had I have not read the book prior I don't think it'd be getting anywhere near 6/10 from me.

    SUMMARY: GO READ THE BOOK INSTEAD, AN ABSOLUTELY AMAZING READ.
    1joshuakyte-60400

    Worst Adaptation Ever

    First... I did not know anything about this awesome, and I can't say that enough, awesome book becoming a movie. I have had to read this book at least 10 times over the last few years and some of my most favorite life quotes came from this book. So when I saw this as a movie and John as the main role I knew it was going to be amazing. I mean if I could cast the main character myself it would be John.

    BUT... Well, if the director had made a movie out of the book, it would have been amazing. If the movie had any of the most notable and required pieces of the plot it would have been amazing. If the director had even read anything to do with the book, even the dust jacket, it would have been amazing. But he didn't, he didn't, he didn't.

    SO... The movie sucked. I don't like to use that type of "language" when reviewing anything, but there is no other choices here. Everything about the movie was wrong and I gave it a lot of room, a lot of space to make errors and not flow the same. Because ultimately you want to be surprised by the movie. You ultimately want the director to make it his own just a little bit, put his spin on something and have it shine even more. And I did, I watched the movie to the very end. Checked behind the credits and everything. And now I wish I would have gone on for the rest of my life without knowing this movie existed.

    IF... Now one might think by my review that had you not read the book, you might have liked it but sadly that is not true. This is not only the worst adaptation of a book ever, but it is also just poorly put together, scripted, acted, and there is no redeemable quality anywhere.

    Such as... The sound effects were horrible, the video tried to be dark and creepy, but it was just bland. There was very little action or scare factor other than some BOO moments from the "zombies type people." If you didn't see something coming from a mile away it is because it made no sense. The ending was a little baffling on how horrible it was. I mean I am actually trying to think of one thing. Just one that I can say and would take this movie from a 1 star to at least a 1.5 star. But I can't. I can't think of a single thing that I can look back on and say that was cool/nice/awesome/not terrible.

    Lastly... So I will leave you with this. I am actually praying that I reach you before you watched this movie. I am hoping one of your not nice friends didn't play a prank on you and made you pay for this movie. It is my desire that this review has reached you before you have wasted one single heartbeat within the vicinity of this horrible, horrible film mistake. And I thank you for reading my review and I am sorry to those that I did not reach in time.

    Joshua Kyte
    1carlcasso

    What Book Did They Read ???????

    I remember reading this book and thinking what an amazing Movie it would make. With the right cast and script I knew this could be a winner. I waited for someone to make it and finally they did.

    We were getting John Cusack and Samuel L Jackson. How could they not make an amazing movie.

    I waited eagerly to view this long anticipated adventure and thought the day would never arrive when I could get the chance to see it.

    Then I did.

    Firstly it has very little in common with the book I read. the book is very clever and draws you into the story. The movie is not clever and the story is thrown at us.

    In The book we care about all the characters. In the movie we don't.

    I have to admit I walked out before the end. I just couldn't take anymore.

    Why oh why did they not just stick to the books narrative.

    I know you have to cut corners but they didn't cut corners, they invented new corners that had nothing to do with the story.

    I love Stephen King and have read all of his books but I'm tired of seeing them butchered by Movie makers who just don't understand the story.

    Save your money. Don't even bother renting this movie.

    Watch TV instead.
    5voyou-703-655350

    Intense start but lazy end

    This variation of the zombie apocalypse borrows from films like 28 Weeks Later or Kaufman's Invasion of the Body Snatchers. That is to say, it relies more on psychological tension than on graphic violence (but still contains some graphic violence.) The first act is pretty good, intense, sharp, adopting a fast pace that dispenses us of the genre's clichés. That won't last as it will turn into standard fare. Finally, in the 3rd act, the writer completely drops the ball and doesn't even bother ending his story properly. He just takes the easiest way out and deserves some boos for it.

    Bad storytelling is enough to make a movie bad and a rating low. Here however, I balance it with the impressive beginning and the excellent visuals. Also worth mentioning is Samuel L. Jackson who, for the first time in 20 years, portrays a human being instead of his perpetual annoying caricature.
    4eddie_baggins

    A bizarre horror/thriller destined for cult status

    Over the many year's movies have existed there's been a large number of questions raised by movies with answers non-forthcoming. These are questions that have been at the forefront of many a coffee date discussion, movie club forum or family dinner. Questions like who exactly is/was the "thing" (The Thing), is it a dream or reality (Inception), what was in the briefcase (Pulp Fiction) and now with this long completed and finally just released Stephen King adaptation we can add why exactly was John Cusack's in danger graphic novelist Clay Riddell so keen to pop on his beanie in the midst of a do or die cell phone lead apocalypse?

    It's a question we may sadly never have answered and probably the only thing that will stick with you once Tod William's (where has the director who made The Door in the Floor gone?) film reaches its credit sequence, as this adaptation of one of King's least regarded books is one of those films just waiting to join the likes of The Wicker Man remake as a film that's just so bizarre and random it's hard to know who did and why they decided this was a film the public wanted.

    In all its random glory however, if I was being totally honest, after all the negative press and jokes being made at its expense, Cell is not nearly as bad as it could've been when watched with the right mindset.

    A seriously daft idea that induces a large amount of unintended laughter, Cell has its fair share of "what the" moments and it's a little sad seeing the likes of John Cusack (although he seems to have sold his movie soul some time ago now) and Samuel L. Jackson act through some insanely bizarre situations; I truly can't even begin to explain a scene involving a field of sleeping cell phone zombies, the film actually has some decent scenes and ideas that make this a B grade experience you can sit back and laugh at or with and an experience best watched with a room full of friends all up to witness a film that should never have made it to the cold light of day.

    Through the history of movies we've been treated to King adaptation gold, from experiences like The Shawshank Redemption, The Green Mile, The Shining and The Mist, Cell is certainly not one of those and is certainly not a film of cinematic virtue but it's an experience that deserves to be seen as even if you hate every minute of this oddball ride its likely you've never seen anything like it before and if you solve the beanie mystery, please let me know.

    2 troll lol lol's out of 5

    Stephen King Movies Ranked by IMDb Rating

    Stephen King Movies Ranked by IMDb Rating

    See how IMDb users rank the feature films based on the work of Stephen King.
    See the list
    Production art
    Liste

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      Among many differences from the source material, in the book, the zombie-like infected continue to have their brains re-written every night and evolve further psychic abilities, including telekinesis, which allows them to fly. This is explained as the infection having unlocked the human brain's latent supernatural potential. This idea is only vaguely alluded to in the film when the survivors of the boys school explain that the human brain is like a computer and that this could be the next stage in human evolution.
    • Gaffes
      On Tom McCourt's advice, Clay puts a cellphone in the fridge to cool the battery down to make the charge last longer yet he fails to do the obvious and turn it off. Also the theory of 'making a phone battery last longer by freezing it' is dubious at most, but the characters may not know any better.
    • Citations

      Tom McCourt: Clay, I'm really sorry about your family.

      Clay Riddell: Don't be sorry because there is nothing to be sorry about yet.

    • Crédits fous
      After the closing credits have finished, the catalyst signal from the movie plays for approximately 5-10 seconds, with no image, as if attempting to convert the audience.
    • Connexions
      Featured in FoundFlix: Stephen King's CELL (2016) Ending Explained (2016)
    • Bandes originales
      I am glad, I am very glad, because i'm finally returning back home
      aka "Trololo song"

      Music by Arkadiy Ostrovskiy

      Performed by Eduard Khil

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ19

    • How long is Cell?Alimenté par Alexa
    • What is the title of the poem recited by Samuel L. Jackson's character in the office of open air cinema?
    • What is 'Cell' about?
    • Is 'Cell' based on a book?

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 10 juin 2016 (États-Unis)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • L'appel des zombies
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Atlanta, Géorgie, États-Unis
    • Sociétés de production
      • The Genre Co.
      • Benaroya Pictures
      • 120dB Films
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Montant brut mondial
      • 1 323 012 $US
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      • 1h 38min(98 min)
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • Dolby Digital
    • Rapport de forme
      • 2.39:1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.