[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de parutionsTop 250 des filmsFilms les plus regardésRechercher des films par genreSommet du box-officeHoraires et ticketsActualités du cinémaFilms indiens en vedette
    À la télé et en streamingTop 250 des sériesSéries les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités TV
    Que regarderDernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbFamily Entertainment GuidePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Nés aujourd’huiCélébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d’aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels du secteur
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
IMDbPro

Ghosts of Goldfield

  • Vidéo
  • 2007
  • R
  • 1h 28min
NOTE IMDb
2,8/10
862
MA NOTE
Ghosts of Goldfield (2007)
Horror

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA group of five led by Julie set up their filming equipment in the hotel of the derelict town of Goldfield, hoping to capture footage of the ghost of Elisabeth Walker, a maid tortured and ki... Tout lireA group of five led by Julie set up their filming equipment in the hotel of the derelict town of Goldfield, hoping to capture footage of the ghost of Elisabeth Walker, a maid tortured and killed in room 109. Troubled by visions, Julie discovers that a necklace, handed down to her... Tout lireA group of five led by Julie set up their filming equipment in the hotel of the derelict town of Goldfield, hoping to capture footage of the ghost of Elisabeth Walker, a maid tortured and killed in room 109. Troubled by visions, Julie discovers that a necklace, handed down to her from her grandmother, is somehow connecting her to this tragedy.

  • Réalisation
    • Ed Winfield
  • Scénario
    • Dominic Biondi
    • Brian McMahon
  • Casting principal
    • Kellan Lutz
    • Marnette Patterson
    • Mandy Amano
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    2,8/10
    862
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Ed Winfield
    • Scénario
      • Dominic Biondi
      • Brian McMahon
    • Casting principal
      • Kellan Lutz
      • Marnette Patterson
      • Mandy Amano
    • 19avis d'utilisateurs
    • 14avis des critiques
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Photos5

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux10

    Modifier
    Kellan Lutz
    Kellan Lutz
    • Chad
    Marnette Patterson
    Marnette Patterson
    • Julie
    Mandy Amano
    Mandy Amano
    • Keri
    Scott Whyte
    • Dean
    Richie Chance
    Richie Chance
    • Mike
    • (as Richard Chance)
    Chuck Zito
    Chuck Zito
    • George Winfield
    Ashly Margaret Rae
    • Elizabeth
    • (as Ashly Rae)
    John Bloom
    John Bloom
    • Clancy
    Teri Corcoran
    • Can Can Dancer
    Roddy Piper
    Roddy Piper
    • Jackson Smith
    • Réalisation
      • Ed Winfield
    • Scénario
      • Dominic Biondi
      • Brian McMahon
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs19

    2,8862
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    2parmenides6

    Very bad, stay away!

    The plot of this movie is the basic haunted house scenario. However it suffers from bad direction, a bad script, bad acting and bad special effects. The cast is relatively small and I only recognised two of them, Roddy Piper (They Live) and Marnette Patterson (Kaley Cuoco's sister in Charmed). Marnette can act and in my opinion is the only person in the movie who can. I would go into more detail but i wasted enough time watching the movie itself so I'm not going to waste any more.

    This should be a 1 star rating but unfortunately and unbelievably I have seen worse movies than this, therefore I have to save the 1's for them.
    2movieman_kev

    C'mon Rowdy Roddy, you can do SO much better

    Julie and her crew go down to the ghost town of Goldfield hoping to get some juicy stuff about the nearby hotel that's supposedly haunted by Elizabeth Walker, a young woman who had been killed after her wealthy guy found out that the baby she was carrying was not his own. The crew want to get video of her as she prowls the hotel's corridors looking for said baby, who was also murdered.

    The big selling point for me in renting this film was the sheer fact the Roddy Piper was in it. Visons of past greatness such as "They Live", "Hell Comes to Frogtown" (and to a lesser degree "No Contest") danced in my head. I was kind of hoping to see a nice ghost story as well. Sadly this mess of a film accomplished neither as I soon sadly realized that Piper's character was dreadfully under-developed and left him nothing to work with. And the ghost story was predictable, trite, and above all dreadfully boring. Leave this one in the bargain bin where it belongs.

    My Grade: D-

    DVD Extras: a stills gallery; a trailer for this film; and trailers for "Dark Reel", "Baseline Killer", & "Carnivorous"
    3cobbler88

    Insultingly Bad

    I don't watch a horror movie looking for perfection. I look for a decent story that isn't screwed up by the actors or production staff. Unfortunately, pretty much everything that could have been done wrong in this film was.

    First, lets talk about the group of five documenting hauntings in the abandoned hotel. Only three of the five were actually doing so. The two remaining hangers-on were the stock obnoxious boyfriend and slutty girlfriend - both of whom were so obviously ill-matched with their partners that it trumped all suspension of disbelief. There was simply no way either of the documentarians would have been going out with either of their mates.

    Second, lets talk about shooting day for night. This is when a film is shot in daylight but manipulated to make it appear that the scenes were shot at night. At the very darkest it appears that the events in this movie occurred at around dusk. During other interior shots throughout the film it was clearly daylight outside because - duh - you could see the daylight through the windows. I don't believe a single exterior shot was actually filmed at night, and sometimes within the same scene the lighting would change from more red to more blue. The characters also inexplicably kept returning to what seems to be the basement of the hotel, which not only seemed to be a bit more haunted than the rest of the place, but also generally had daylight streaming down into it.

    Third, how about doing at least a LITTLE research for minor points? This Nevada hotel was, to paraphrase, "one of the grandest hotels between Chicago and San Francisco. Now it sits abandoned off I-95." Can anyone tell me what is wrong with that sentence? Exactly! I-95 runs north-south from Maine to Florida. Would it really have taken more than 20 seconds to find a genuine interstate or state highway along which to place this hotel? Fourth, the ending is never explained and the viewer is left not really knowing why it ended as it did. I know this is often a device used by inferior film-makers to deflect criticism by reflecting it back to how stupid the viewer must be to not understand the film. Viewers too often fall into this trap, and sometimes with good reason. In this case, however, the nonsensical ending is yet another symptom of a horrible movie - not the viewer's inability to follow a story.

    Even when looking for a low-budget horror flick to pass an October evening, avoid this one.
    Wizard-8

    The ghost stories you told as a kid were better than this!

    I decided to rent this movie mainly because Roddy Piper was in it. In the past, he has appeared in some very enjoyable movies, and I thought this effort might be another one. Sadly, Roddy is not one of the main characters, and not only is he unrecognizable, he doesn't get to do that much here.

    The rest of the movie is even worse. It appears that the movie only spent money on the digital camera and a few other technical pieces of equipment, because hardly anything resembling "production values" appears on screen. It just seems that the movie had access to a bar and an abandoned building, and wrote a screenplay that could use those locations without bringing in anything else. As a result, the movie looks extremely cheap, not helped by poor lighting and goofs like the shadow of the boom mike appearing on a wall in the background.

    But what's worse is the extremely slow pace. It takes forever for the characters to realize they are in jeopardy, and once they realize this, they don't do the logical thing like get out of there.

    In short, there is absolutely nothing here to justify giving the movie a look.
    3kosmasp

    Urban Legend ... not

    If I was actually curious I would check out, why this was originally intended to be part of the Urban Legend(s) cinematic universe (not sure if they'd have called it that back in the day). But I am not. Feel free to roam this page or the internet if you are curious, I give you my blessings.

    Having said that, it was nice to see Roddy Piper and Marnette or Kellan Lutz. They still do not make up for the insanity you are about to witness. Although in one case it works in favor of the movie. That is the sex scene - or rather the aftermath of the sex scene. While the obvious dubbing of the moaning is already funny (and surely not intended to be that way), what really is pure comedy is how the characters react to the said intercourse. You could also call it bad acting of course ... and unintended to the highest degree. Still the best scene of the whole movie.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    Urban Legend: Bloody Mary
    4,1
    Urban Legend: Bloody Mary
    Urban Legend 2 : Coup de grâce
    4,4
    Urban Legend 2 : Coup de grâce
    Urban Legend
    5,6
    Urban Legend
    Whistle
    5,5
    Whistle
    Bloody Mary
    3,3
    Bloody Mary
    Urban Legend
    Urban Legend
    Urban Legends
    6,7
    Urban Legends
    Urban Legend
    5,4
    Urban Legend
    Douce nuit, sanglante nuit: les jouets de la mort
    4,6
    Douce nuit, sanglante nuit: les jouets de la mort
    Mortelle Saint Valentin
    4,9
    Mortelle Saint Valentin
    Shepherd
    2,9
    Shepherd
    The Beacon
    4,6
    The Beacon

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      Originally intended to be part of the Urban Legend (1998) franchise.
    • Gaffes
      The sound equipment bag keeps disappearing and appearing. When Dean is searching for Keri, the strap is across his body in some shots but missing in the next shot. Additionally, Dean lays the bag on the floor just inside the door to the mineshaft but it's missing when Julie enters the mineshaft.
    • Citations

      Bartender: We don't got no Kozmos !

    • Crédits fous
      At the end of the credits, the ghost makes a final jump scare appearance.
    • Connexions
      Follows Urban Legend (1998)

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 27 mars 2007 (États-Unis)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Urban Legends 4
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Tonopah, Nevada, États-Unis(Mizpah Hotel)
    • Société de production
      • 18th Avenue Productions
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 28 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • Réponses IMDb : Aidez à combler les lacunes dans nos données
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.