NOTE IMDb
4,6/10
451
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA retired lawyer investigates a murder that occurred in the house he has just moved into with his daughter, unaware the killer is watching him.A retired lawyer investigates a murder that occurred in the house he has just moved into with his daughter, unaware the killer is watching him.A retired lawyer investigates a murder that occurred in the house he has just moved into with his daughter, unaware the killer is watching him.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Katherine Dines
- Marlee Hall
- (as Katherine Dines-Craig)
Brent Donnelly
- Gary Taylor
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
This made for TV movie isn't brilliant but it is not that bad either. The viewer figures out quickly who the murder is. But the tension does build up well. There are a few plot holes but these are made up by fair acting and good location camera work.
Good after fun.
My Ratings:
Story 1.25 : Direction 1.25 : Pace 1.00 : Acting 1.25 : Entertaining 1.25
Total 6.00 out of 10.00.
I find TV Movies can fall into two categories. Bad or Not Too Bad. Very seldom do they encroach into the good and excellent fields. This one lands firmly in the Not Too Bad field.
The only trouble I have with this movie is the fact you know who the killer is at an early stage. This is a shame as it starts as a whodunnit, my favourite type of mystery movie. The casting department falls into its usual routine mistake. They give the role of the bad-guy to an actor or actress who typically plays the villain. So as soon as they appear on the screen you're thinking, Yeah! It's them. Then when that person's mental illness surfaces, you know without a doubt they carried out the dirty deed. It would have been nice if this had been a red herring. It would have elevated the story and film up an extra notch or two.
That said, Robert Malenfant, who wrote and directed the story, along with screenwriter, Christine Conradt, give the audience a well structured, if predictable, story.
Malenfant also does a decent job with the direction. Though a few changes in tempo would have helped with building the required tension at times. Nonetheless, the film kept my attention and amplified my enjoyment. Though it was the actors and actresses portrayals of their characters that pulled me into the story.
In particular, Daniel J. Travanti, as the busy-body ex-lawyer Stan Douglas. He gives a soft and understated performance. However, it's his actions and reactions with the rest of the cast that makes the film. Whoever he shares the scene with their skill appears boosted by his being there. For example, sometimes Barbara Niven, who plays the lead of Lauren Kessler, comes across a tad two dimensional. When she's with Travanti, though, she is more enlivened and realistic. Nearly a woman you could relate to and care about. This, for me, is also one of Gary Hudson's better roles as Brian Ellis.
Like I said at the start, this is a Not Too Bad film. In these days of CoVid lockdown, you could do a lot worse than checking out this film. So if you like your psychological thrillers, and this is on a telly channel near you, flick on the station and waste an hour and a half.
Jog on over to my The Game Is Afoot list and see where this Telly Film landed in my rankings. You may find another tasty morsel for your viewing pleasure.
Take Care and Stay Well.
I find TV Movies can fall into two categories. Bad or Not Too Bad. Very seldom do they encroach into the good and excellent fields. This one lands firmly in the Not Too Bad field.
The only trouble I have with this movie is the fact you know who the killer is at an early stage. This is a shame as it starts as a whodunnit, my favourite type of mystery movie. The casting department falls into its usual routine mistake. They give the role of the bad-guy to an actor or actress who typically plays the villain. So as soon as they appear on the screen you're thinking, Yeah! It's them. Then when that person's mental illness surfaces, you know without a doubt they carried out the dirty deed. It would have been nice if this had been a red herring. It would have elevated the story and film up an extra notch or two.
That said, Robert Malenfant, who wrote and directed the story, along with screenwriter, Christine Conradt, give the audience a well structured, if predictable, story.
Malenfant also does a decent job with the direction. Though a few changes in tempo would have helped with building the required tension at times. Nonetheless, the film kept my attention and amplified my enjoyment. Though it was the actors and actresses portrayals of their characters that pulled me into the story.
In particular, Daniel J. Travanti, as the busy-body ex-lawyer Stan Douglas. He gives a soft and understated performance. However, it's his actions and reactions with the rest of the cast that makes the film. Whoever he shares the scene with their skill appears boosted by his being there. For example, sometimes Barbara Niven, who plays the lead of Lauren Kessler, comes across a tad two dimensional. When she's with Travanti, though, she is more enlivened and realistic. Nearly a woman you could relate to and care about. This, for me, is also one of Gary Hudson's better roles as Brian Ellis.
Like I said at the start, this is a Not Too Bad film. In these days of CoVid lockdown, you could do a lot worse than checking out this film. So if you like your psychological thrillers, and this is on a telly channel near you, flick on the station and waste an hour and a half.
Jog on over to my The Game Is Afoot list and see where this Telly Film landed in my rankings. You may find another tasty morsel for your viewing pleasure.
Take Care and Stay Well.
( Review of "Blood Stains" the movie )
This is the second "mystery" movie this week I have watched that made the same mistake ... letting the audience know who the killer is right from the start.
If they would have kept the killer in a mask, or in the shadows, it would made this film a lot better to sit threw.
As it is, this movie is incredibly boring. It reminds me of a not so good remake of "Matlock", or some other 80's crime mystery TV show.
The characters themselves act more like they are in a soap opera, than a movie.
There is no mystery, no suspense, no real drama, and no dramatic ending. I bought this movie, new, for $1.99, and it feels like I was overcharged.
This is the second "mystery" movie this week I have watched that made the same mistake ... letting the audience know who the killer is right from the start.
If they would have kept the killer in a mask, or in the shadows, it would made this film a lot better to sit threw.
As it is, this movie is incredibly boring. It reminds me of a not so good remake of "Matlock", or some other 80's crime mystery TV show.
The characters themselves act more like they are in a soap opera, than a movie.
There is no mystery, no suspense, no real drama, and no dramatic ending. I bought this movie, new, for $1.99, and it feels like I was overcharged.
Lauren and her father Stan move into what they believe is a nice neighborhood. What they don't realize is that a murder was committed on their property, leaving a little girl without her parents. The father, Garrett, was killed, and the mother, Amanda, was sent to prison--apparently as the result of incompetent or lazy lawyers. Stan, who was a prosecutor before developing health problems, now teaches at a local college, and he decides to find a way to reopen the case. Brian, another teacher at the college who becomes friendly with Lauren (and possibly more than just friends), would prefer that the case not be reopened. In fact, his behavior when he is alone resembles that of a stalker.
Through flashbacks, we are shown the events leading to the murder as well as the traumatic discovery of the body. We also see Lauren's memory of the tragic death of her own daughter Stephanie, who would have been the other girl's age had she lived. Lauren keeps Stephanie alive through her children's book series. She is also shown at a book-signing and one of the girls there is absolutely adorable, though she has just one line.
There's nothing that special here, though the leading actors do a good job, particularly Daniel J. Travanti as Stan. I did not recognize him, though I saw very few episodes of "Hill Street Blues." But the real standout performance here comes from Lisa Zane as Brian's ex-wife Roxanne, who only he can see. She is wacko! Could she actually be dead and haunting him, or is he crazy? Well, we know from the start that something's not right with him.
Through flashbacks, we are shown the events leading to the murder as well as the traumatic discovery of the body. We also see Lauren's memory of the tragic death of her own daughter Stephanie, who would have been the other girl's age had she lived. Lauren keeps Stephanie alive through her children's book series. She is also shown at a book-signing and one of the girls there is absolutely adorable, though she has just one line.
There's nothing that special here, though the leading actors do a good job, particularly Daniel J. Travanti as Stan. I did not recognize him, though I saw very few episodes of "Hill Street Blues." But the real standout performance here comes from Lisa Zane as Brian's ex-wife Roxanne, who only he can see. She is wacko! Could she actually be dead and haunting him, or is he crazy? Well, we know from the start that something's not right with him.
This is no mystery, for the viewer knows almost from the beginning who the killer is, but it is a fairly decent made-for-TV suspense thriller. The story premise is an intriguing one. A divorcée, Lauren Kessler (Barbara Niven), and her retired prosecutor father, Stran Douglas (Daniel J. Travanti), have moved into a new home unaware that a murder was committed in the guest house not long before. When Lauren learns of the dastardly deed she has her father check out the Pennsylvania law on disclosure. He learns that the Realtor had done nothing contrary to state law but becomes involved in reopening the case, since apparently the local authorities had botched the investigation sending the victim's wife to prison on circumstantial evidence. The couple's only child, Genesis, was placed in the custody of the wife's sister, Clair (Ellen Dubin), who works with Lauren and Stran to clear her sister and free her from prison. Stran encourages his daughter to date a friendly neighbor, Brian Ellis (Gary Hudson). Then the fun begins. The key to the mystery for the amateur sleuths is to uncover the victim's lover.
The beautiful Ottawa scenery (a stand-in for Pennsylvania) adds much to the film. The acting is first rate with a standout performance by Lisa Zane, playing the ghost of Roxanne, Brian's deceased wife. Gary Hudson makes a quirky Brian Ellis reminding the viewer of Eric Roberts, an old pro at playing such roles. The suspense never lets up, even with the commercial breaks.
Somewhat predictable and filled with plot holes, "Murder in My House" is worthwhile for fans of the genre. Not bad for a made-for-TV flick.
The beautiful Ottawa scenery (a stand-in for Pennsylvania) adds much to the film. The acting is first rate with a standout performance by Lisa Zane, playing the ghost of Roxanne, Brian's deceased wife. Gary Hudson makes a quirky Brian Ellis reminding the viewer of Eric Roberts, an old pro at playing such roles. The suspense never lets up, even with the commercial breaks.
Somewhat predictable and filled with plot holes, "Murder in My House" is worthwhile for fans of the genre. Not bad for a made-for-TV flick.
Le saviez-vous
- GaffesThere is a murder in the opening sequence of the movie, but the "dead" guy's eyes are rolling around under the closed eyelids.
- ConnexionsReferenced in Rivalité maternelle (2006)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 33min(93 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant