Ban the Sadist Videos!

Ban the Sadist Videos! (2005)

*** 1/2 (out of 4)

Very good documentary from David Gregory taking a look at the 1980s in Britain as the start of the decade saw a major boom in the video rental market. A lot of the biggest renters were horror movies like CANNIBAL HOLOCAUST, EATEN ALIVE, THE DRILLER KILLER and I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE. The problem is that the moral police started to think that these movies were going to damage those watching them so a push was made to get movies like these banned or at least censored to the point where there would be no reason to watch them.

BAN THE SADIST VIDEOS! is a very good documentary that horror fans are really going to enjoy. It's also safe to say that they're going to be enraged by some of the archival interviews where people claim that if you watch this type of stuff you're going to pretty much turn into a raving killer yourself. American horror films had issues with the MPAA and various women's rights groups but there's no doubt that the BBFC took things a bit further by banning movies and in some cases people getting send to jail for showing the films. The documentary does an extremely good job at explaining how all of this happened and why the moral police were so worried about certain titles.

It's a bit of a shame this is split into two parts - but be that as it may, the documentary is quite eye opening. I imagine those who followed (either back then or have read upon that time) what happened during the "video nasties era", will know most of the stuff that is discussed here.

Having said that, it is always refreshing seeing and hearing from experts. And getting things debunked - either from others or by your own common sense. Like when one of the censors replies to those who say he can't judge the things he hasn't seen with: "a doctor does not need to have had cancer to diagnose it". I may be paraphrasing, but that is the essence of what he said. Now that equivalence is completely off. Because his comparisons would only be true, if he meant: I do not have to kill someone to watch those - or something along those lines. His comparison to the doctor would only be right, if he said it like this: A doctor can only diagnose cancer, if he has seen it before. If he knows what it looks like - if has read up on it, if has dealt with it on some level". But that comparison would not suit the censor, because it would make him look as bad as he does look, while claiming the things about movies, he has no clue about.

There is even more here and the documentary tells us and shows us a ... well "witch hunt" of movies, if you'll excuse the pun. Really worth the watch, if you are a fan of movies and even more so of horror movies ... crazy things happened, that still are not totally resolved it seems.

This was a documentary that I learned about when searching online for documentaries about horror films. I'm fascinated by the Video Nasties' movement in the United Kingdom after learning about it from podcasts. This was doc was streaming on Tubi, so I decided to give this a watch while working, treating it as a podcast.

What I like here is that we're getting an in-depth look at this scandal during the 1980s in Great Britain. Something that this documentary does better than others I've watched recently, it presents both sides of the argument. I can see the side of those that are in favor of banning certain movies like Driller Killer or Cannibal Holocaust. I disagree with banning them though.

This should fall to the discretion of parents. I don't think that the government should prevent adults from seeking out what they want. There seems to be that those in power are looking down on people that they consider to be 'simple'. This brings up a good point that censors are watching this film. Why would they be okay as opposed to the masses? Many of the movies referenced here I've seen. Cannibal Holocaust is great. Driller Killer is solid. There are many others that aren't very good, just using shock as their only gimmick.

Shifting back to parents needing to be allowed to oversee their children and not the government idea. Now I've had cart blanche to watch almost anything that I've wanted to. There were just things like Cannibal Holocaust or The Last House on the Left that my father didn't want my sister and I watching. I'm glad that he did, we weren't prepared for those. Things like Dawn of the Dead or Zombie, they didn't do damage outside making most everything we saw after that tamer. My mother would get mad when she sent me in to rent or buy something, then had to force her to come in. I can see both sides here, but this doc brings up good ideas.

I'd say that this is well-made. I love that this presents both sides of the arguments. Explaining why this was being done and then using clips to help present those points is good. This is a solid documentary that I'd recommend for sure.

My Rating: 8 out of 10.

Highly informative and relatively interesting "Ban the Sadist Videos!" approximates us with details about the infamous social and politic acts against what was considered to be a risk to the British society: violence, gore, sex, drugs, shocking and disturbing things...presented on recurrent films of the 1970's and 1980's. Thatcher government started to regulate what could be and what couldn't be presented on home video entertainment, something that only occurred on films released on theaters with films being edited by BBFC.

It is established here that films like "The Driller Killer", "Evil Dead" and "Cannibal Holocaust" were the major responsible for a wave of control on the films later called of "videos nasties" after lots of appealing publicity on newspapers urging its viewers to rent and watch a film with shocking scenes (theaters weren't so interesting anymore, now with VCR's available in most homes).

Silly moral crusader Mary Whitehouse and her extensive and successful campaign to forbid these films on British territory is greatly presented here, giving some insights on how dumb some moralists were since they never saw those films, only hearing what people would say about them. Laws were created, BBFC also censored or even banned some of the films (the funniest case was "The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas" considered as pornographic because of its title). The criterion of which films should be allowed or not to be released or edited was ridiculous and even "Apocalypse Now" had some troubles with this persecution.

All that in the name of the children's sake since they were exposed to them constantly, and society feared possible copycats (oh dear...) who were starting to appear, imitating film serial killers but this time killing real people in real life, finding their inspiration on films. Bottom of line: our society is dangerous because of the films it produces and not backwards, the moralists were saying.

The discussion stretches out for so long (there's the second "Ban the Sadist Videos!" which deals with more on this last subject of 'danger to the society'). Well made and providing classic moments of horror films and nice archive footage of news covering the subject this documentary is quite restrained in its presentation, lack so much energy that it almost becomes boring; and some informations and scenes are quite repetitive. The short interviews with Deodato, Craven and other masters of horror were very good just as much as the interviews with people who were part of the conflicts over the videos.

It's quite good but it only works if you don't know anything about the incidents portrayed here. I believe that people more versed on the subject won't find it much amusing or appealing. 8/10

I well remember this period in recent UK history, the hysteria created to deflect from real economic issues of the time, and whilst it now seems like an anachronism it's worth remembering that inexplicably the remnants of this extra-judicial Draconian system of oppression still exists today.

Interesting to hear contemporary and modern perspectives from every side of the issue, of course the chief protagonists (antagonists?) are no longer able to provide a reflection of their thought-processes and justification for their conduct, but there's a couple of pundits on hand to echo their sentiments and overall it seemed an open and unfettered critical analysis.

The penalties which were applied in some instances were manifestly excessive (incarceration) although it seems these were a minority; it's even more concerning how inconsistently the Act was applied by regional constabularies, even to the extent of the titles that were confiscated, amounting to a farcical subjective witch-hunt akin to England's own Spanish Inquisition or House of UnAmerican activities blacklisting.

Good to have interviews included from the auteurs themselves, after all they caused all the fuss; Franco, Deodarto, Craven, uniformly confounded in their reactions to the attitudes of the British Government, a peculiar malady one of the social scientists refers to as a distinctly British cultural trait that no one can explain, just a unique phenomenon of being British, which he quickly corrects to just 'English' - haha, the ultimate self-ridicule.

If you're keen to know what all the fuss was about, check it out it's about an hour long and highly informative as well as entertaining as it shows a lot of the scenes which were cut from various films targeted by the BBFC, presented in graphic, gory detail to apparently corrupt our febrile minds.