[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
IMDbPro

Automatons

  • 2006
  • 1h 23min
NOTE IMDb
4,5/10
242
MA NOTE
Christine Spencer in Automatons (2006)
HorreurScience-fiction

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA low-tech FX film about the horrors of war and robots.A low-tech FX film about the horrors of war and robots.A low-tech FX film about the horrors of war and robots.

  • Réalisation
    • James Felix McKenney
  • Scénario
    • James Felix McKenney
  • Casting principal
    • Christine Spencer
    • Angus Scrimm
    • Brenda Cooney
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    4,5/10
    242
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • James Felix McKenney
    • Scénario
      • James Felix McKenney
    • Casting principal
      • Christine Spencer
      • Angus Scrimm
      • Brenda Cooney
    • 8avis d'utilisateurs
    • 13avis des critiques
    • 43Métascore
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Photos13

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 8
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux19

    Modifier
    Christine Spencer
    • The Girl
    Angus Scrimm
    Angus Scrimm
    • The Scientist
    Brenda Cooney
    Brenda Cooney
    • The Enemy Leader
    Jennifer Boutell
    • Enemy Commander
    Noah DeFilippis
    • Soldier Robot
    Shell Driver
    • Sick Enemy
    Larry Fessenden
    Larry Fessenden
    • Enemy Guard
    Benjamin Forster
    Benjamin Forster
    • Enemy Segeant
    • (as Benjamin Hugh Abel Forster)
    Matt Huffman
    Matt Huffman
    • Enemy Man-at-Arms
    Jeremiah Kipp
    Jeremiah Kipp
    • Soldier Robot
    John Levene
    John Levene
    • Communications Captain
    Laree Love
    • Warbots Mk 1 & 2
    Daniel Mazikowski
    Daniel Mazikowski
    • Enemy Guard
    James Felix McKenney
    • Companion Robot Voice
    • (as Clifford Steele)
    Jennifer Shag
    • Sick Enemy
    Mike Thurston
    • Soldier Robot
    Michael Vincent
    • Enemy Guard
    Patrick Williams
    • Soldier Robot
    • Réalisation
      • James Felix McKenney
    • Scénario
      • James Felix McKenney
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs8

    4,5242
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    oscar-35

    An Twilight Zone 50's feel with sinister robots is fun.

    It's not for everyone - it's odd and experimental - but if you're a fan of Guy Maddin or early David Lynch, this film is for you. It's B & W. I loved 'Automatons'.

    I saw it as part of an all-night sci-fi marathon which is probably not the best venue for this film. I know that any unknown film would be harshly judged by the mob rule of three hundred, irritable, over-tired nerds. They probably hated it.

    Look at all of the positive reviews this film got through the mainstream press and movie reviewers. They are NOT all friends of the filmmaker. It had an enjoyable Twilight Zone 50's feel. Thanks Monsterpants DOT com.
    2bernie-122

    The plural of Automaton is Automata

    The title should have given it away. This is really just a waste of time, not worth for anybody to bother to watch.

    The earlier reviewer is right; any comparisons to Guy Maddin or David Lynch are just ludicrous.

    If the maker had a sense of humour, it might have had a chance to land in the "so bad it's good" category but, alas, such is not the case.

    The "robots" are nowhere near as endearing as the Daleks on Dr. Who. The FX are one notch above toy spaceships on strings. The acting and script are pitiful. The plot is threadbare. The direction is a bad Ed Wood imitation.

    Watch paint dry or something instead.
    1geg3

    absolute garbage

    the most uncreative garbage I've ever seen. i don't care how much money was spent on a film - a good story is a good story. this didn't even HAVE a story.

    i watched the making of documentary included on the DVD, just to get a feel for WHAT THE HELL THEY WERE THINKING when making this. turns out: not much! a group of stereotypical jocks in their mid 30s decide to make a movie. they want to make it about robots! and it has to have fighting! they wrote the "script" about 10 minutes before the actors say the lines. they make fun of one of the actors to his face cause he has a nerdy hair cut, and the actor is obviously uncomfortable. they have no opinion about how the actors deliver the lines, and are more interested in drinking coors light and dumping gloves full of sweat (the robot costumes were hot) on their friend's heads after seeing behind the scenes, the film (lol) itself makes a lot more sense. a bunch of talentless dumbasses making a really bad sub-home movie grade short film (maybe 15 minutes of content total) and padding it out with 70 minutes of filler.

    only see this if you are a masochist with an acute need to have your intelligence insulted
    2jamesstreet

    Skip it

    Shot B/W (although its not film --edit, my mistake, its 8mm) with early '50s styled robots and mid '80s style gore. If the filmmaker had a sense of humor, this could have been good campy fun. But instead a tired message is presented over a nonexistent plot with little dialog. You end up with more than an hour of walking and (occasionally) fighting '50s robots, and about 20 minutes of actual plot delivering movie.

    Even if your a movie junkie who has seen everything, skip this. Its not awful, but it is bad and you wont gain anything from it. Comments relating it to Guy Maddin or Rod Serling's Twighlight Zone series are crazy. Even worse is the connection to David Lynch - completely unwarranted.

    Skip it, or waste 1.5 hours.
    7lathe-of-heaven

    Again People... Let's PLEASE remember what TYPE of film we are talking about...

    I will never cease to be amazed at the kind of people that come on here at IMDb for the sole purpose of pissing all over a type of film that they wouldn't like anyway, saying that it is 'A waste of time' or 'Garbage' This is ESPECIALLY true for odd or offbeat Cult films or a particular Genre that the person doesn't even like anyway! What the HELL is the point. I know I've 'said' this before but as an excellent example I personally cannot stand Torture Porn films, BUT, you will NOT see me come on here at IMDb and specifically trash films like 'SAW' & 'HOSTEL' Why...? BECAUSE I DON'T FRIGG'N LIKE THOSE KIND OF FILMS, PERIOD! So, why would I be so stupid and pointless to come here just to write a horrible review of these kinds of films? Will that be of any help at all to people who DO happen to like those kind of films or will it help them to know how well these are done or how entertaining they would be to people who ARE fans of this kind of movie???

    Uh... NO...

    So, my long-winded point being that it is painfully OBVIOUS that this is an extremely offbeat and unusual film, just in the way it was made. I mean, we're not quite talking about Gerry Anderson's 'THUNDERBIRDS' exactly; it's not a puppet show or anything like that, BUT... and it is a BIG BUT like Mariah Carey's... the film makers who went through all this bloody time and trouble CLEARLY have a deep affection for this type of movie. DUH...!!! All you have to do is watch the absolutely WONDERFUL extras and you will see that. These guys went through A LOT of pain and trouble just to get this bugger made.

    It's kinda like what I consider to be some of the excruciatingly CORNY Sci Fi films made in the 1950's (with the exception of the excellent 'FORBIDDEN PLANET' of course! GEEZ, have you seen the new Remastered Blu-ray of FP...? It's so gorgeous I promise you that it will make you cry and have to change your pants at the same time!) Anyway, sorry... But, there are a hell of a lot of people who just adore the most corny films made at that time because they have a personal affection for them; whereas a lot of the rest of us would quite literally be in serious, physical pain if we had to sit through some of them (NOT that I mind a strong CHEEEEEZ factor now and then, but some of these are just pain BAD!) But to THOSE people who love these films, it is a different story.

    So it is sort of like that with this one; these people very painstakingly and lovingly made this film and created this quite surprisingly Surreal and apocalyptic vision of the future, clearly with next to NO budget at all. What I absolutely LOVE about this movie is that it is taken DEADLY serious! Not a shred or ghost of a smirk anywhere to be found. Although, when you watch the extras (which I WHOLEHEARTEDLY recommend if you are a movie maker or true move lover at all) you will see that they had a frigg'n BLAST making this thing! Also, since they clearly had an extremely limited budget, I personally felt that they were brilliant in coming up with not only ways to create the effects, but also the ingenious way in which they processed the photography to give it a very Surreal and quite creative look, considering what they had to work with.

    So, if you are the kind of person who can totally get into this kind of film and just enjoy it for what it is, then it is absolutely great! I warn you though that you WILL have to be quite forgiving with the life-sized robots; they're pretty silly looking... But, if you are like some of these other nay-sayers here who look at the production values and think it's just crap, or homemade, then NO, you will absolutely NOT like it.

    I personally found it to be completely fascinating and somehow in a way that I truly cannot explain, it REALLY grabbed me by the nuts and pulled me completely into the world that they created. Then afterward, watching the 'making of' and the 'extras' just made me fall in love with it all the more...

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      The movie was shot on a 8mm camera and was inspired by old 50s flicks
    • Connexions
      Referenced in Until Dawn (2015)

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 7 septembre 2006 (Allemagne)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Site officiel
      • Official site
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Death to the Automatons
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Brooklyn, Ville de New York, New York, États-Unis
    • Sociétés de production
      • Glass Eye Pix
      • MonsterPants Movies
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      • 1h 23min(83 min)
    • Couleur
      • Black and White

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.