Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueIn this horrifying, modern retelling of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, a neurosurgeon, obsessed with the reanimation of dead flesh, murders his patients and resurrects the corpse.In this horrifying, modern retelling of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, a neurosurgeon, obsessed with the reanimation of dead flesh, murders his patients and resurrects the corpse.In this horrifying, modern retelling of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, a neurosurgeon, obsessed with the reanimation of dead flesh, murders his patients and resurrects the corpse.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Thomas Downey
- Dr. Robert Walton
- (as Tom Downey)
Joel Ezra Hebner
- The Creature
- (as Joel Hebner)
- …
Dan Kaplan
- Detective Ferrati
- (as Dan Tana)
Tim Travers
- Detective Nimby
- (as Timothy Travers)
Monique Jones
- Susie
- (as Alison Johnston)
Kandis Fay
- Mez
- (as Kandis Erickson)
Avis à la une
when i see a movie review with such polarized opinion, i want to give it a chance. i bought this as a previously viewed DVD from a national video rental chain and only paid $5. not worth the $5. all the bad has been said already.
the acting is about on the par of a softcore film on cinemax. bleh. the only thing i liked about it (maybe didn't dislike is more appropriate) is that the actresses in this movie are pleasing to look at.
i didn't think i would be getting a great movie here and biy was i right. the worst movie i have seen a quite sometime.
this one's going in the garage sale pile.
the acting is about on the par of a softcore film on cinemax. bleh. the only thing i liked about it (maybe didn't dislike is more appropriate) is that the actresses in this movie are pleasing to look at.
i didn't think i would be getting a great movie here and biy was i right. the worst movie i have seen a quite sometime.
this one's going in the garage sale pile.
Very bad acting. This time i could not even laugh at the bad acting as it can be in other horrors sometimes , for some reason i felt sorry for the actors in this case. I also wish Rhett Giles (Victor) could speak more naturally , less drama in his nonstop half whispering voice maybe.
The characters was not interesting ,or believable in any way and i could not care less how the story will develop either . And what is it with the sound , that was really irritating. The sound is changing constantly between to quiet , so you can hardly hear it and very laud , so you can hardly manage to continue watch .
I did not.
The characters was not interesting ,or believable in any way and i could not care less how the story will develop either . And what is it with the sound , that was really irritating. The sound is changing constantly between to quiet , so you can hardly hear it and very laud , so you can hardly manage to continue watch .
I did not.
Where to begin? First off, most of the film is flashbacks. Second, the beginning was stupid, and third, a lot of boring dialog and bad actors. The monster is quite disturbing and so is his roar. They had small parts like when a woman is shown for 2 minutes and is killed. There was parts when i felt like turning it off but I had nothing else to do. After the credits end, there is a minute of the screen pitch black and the music still going. I bet it was to make the movie a minute longer. I gave it a 3, because I like b-horror films,i like Frankenstein movies and you have to give Leigh some credit. My recommendation: if you see it at the video store, tell a person working there that it is a waste of money for you to rent that. So stay away as far as possible. Don't say I didn't warn you.
The film was made in 9 days and it shows. In particular, the budget obviously wasn't large enough to cover a decent recording system. Through out the film in scenes of dialog (and for a horror film there are a LOT of scenes of dialog), the character in screen is recorded loud and clear and the off screen, second voice is inaudible.
Music video-style fast cuts and scene shifts that move backwards and forwards in time are not so much confusing as meant to try and downplay the lack of much plot or its illogic.
The cast is generally quite good and makes a good attempt to overcome the inadequacies of the script and production.
Music video-style fast cuts and scene shifts that move backwards and forwards in time are not so much confusing as meant to try and downplay the lack of much plot or its illogic.
The cast is generally quite good and makes a good attempt to overcome the inadequacies of the script and production.
I have seen this film and was expecting something quite good, but its the worst film I have seen in a long time, the acting is atrocious and wooden.
It seems as if the film was made just for showing gore and forgetting the acting bit.
Basically the storyline would have been good if they had picked decent actors and actresses, bringing it as an up to date story of Frankenstein.
The blood and gore were over emphasised and didn't look real. Just a complete waste of time and money.
It seems as if the film was made just for showing gore and forgetting the acting bit.
Basically the storyline would have been good if they had picked decent actors and actresses, bringing it as an up to date story of Frankenstein.
The blood and gore were over emphasised and didn't look real. Just a complete waste of time and money.
Le saviez-vous
- Crédits fous"The events, characters, and firms depicted in this photoplay are fictitious. Really. Any similarity to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events is purely coincidental, and very weird. We suggest moving, and/or staying away from labs run by psychos."
- ConnexionsFollowed by The Beast of Bray Road (2005)
- Bandes originalesSweet Intoxication
Written and Performed by Eliza Swenson
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 500 000 $US (estimé)
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Frankenstein Reborn (2005) officially released in India in English?
Répondre