Dievu miskas

I have read the novel by Balys Sruoga "Forest of the Gods" twice. Now I watched the movie. For those who also read the book, will surely understand how poor this movie is written/directed compared to the book. Of course, movies shouldn't be copies of the original, BUT it's really important to understand WHY people like the original in the first place! It's the ability to look at such horrific events with irony. The movie tries to look more serious and grotesque than the book and that fails. Also, because there aren't many witty remarks from the book, the film tends to be so slow and boring. I personally found only one interesting thing about the movie - the ending. The ending is so powerful, especially when you know the biography of the author. How hard it was for him to get the book published, that Sruoga didn't even get to see his own autobiographical novel get published due to the Soviet Union restrictions. All in all, I don't recommend watching the film if you read the book, because your expectations will be too high. I wouldn't recommend watching it without reading the book either, because maybe it can leave an impression on the viewer that the book is similar. BELIEVE ME, THE BOOK IS 100% WORTH IT. Please form an opinion just after reading the book, because I know people who disliked the book, it really depends on the individual.

This film is based on a slightly fictionised autobiography and reflects it very well. It's very sad and haunting film, with many interpretational elements. Some scenes are very artistic too. It's a very good arty film.

First of all, the movie doesn't have the same spirit as a book. There were no such irony and satire.. Well, you can find some funny moments, but the book is MUCH better, no doubt.

If not comparing with a book, the movie is still not that good. It's too lengthy & gets boring at some moments.

Besides the concentration camp is shown like a simple jail. I expected it to be more cruel. Prisoners always have cigarettes, they don't seem like starving, warders don't look so sadistic & so on.

All in all, if you are Lithuanian, you should watch this movie. But if you're not - you probably just find it boring.

The main problem with this film is the plodding pace. It's just so slow and long! For a war film, that's hard to accept. The historical context is interesting but this film did not do it as much justice as it deserves. There are moments that propel the plot and kept my interest but overall I would say this is a better sleeping aid than a film.

First thing: this movie "based on the novel". BASED on the novel. So all those, that downrate it, because the movie does not follow beloved book, should start to learn separating one media from another.

There are no synthesized emotions in this. Everything feels real, or at least as real as the emotions in the diary of someone that is waiting for his days to end in concentration camp.

The main advantage of Puipa's masterpiece is this: There is no prejudice, no-goodie-white-hoodie and no evil-bad-wolf-hanibal-lector type characters. Everyone is show as a human. You will not feel sympathy for guards or collaborators, but you will understand things like "why do such people rise in times like this" or even start thinking about reasons that could turn good people into animals. Director won't tell you what to feel! It's such a rare feature, that it is hard to understand this concept at first.

There is some black humor in this movie too. It's dark, noir even, although it's so true, that it feels close even if you can't connect to WWII in any way.

Subtle details, real-life philosophy, humour, rich characters, absolutely stunning camera work makes this movie one of the best. It's not a fairy tale as Shindler's list is: you wont feel guilty if you are not crying in the end and everyone will understand why are you weeping if you do.