NOTE IMDb
4,5/10
38 k
MA NOTE
Nick Larson découvre une façon surnaturelle de changer sa vie et de voyager dans le temps à des moments clés de sa vie en regardant des photographies.Nick Larson découvre une façon surnaturelle de changer sa vie et de voyager dans le temps à des moments clés de sa vie en regardant des photographies.Nick Larson découvre une façon surnaturelle de changer sa vie et de voyager dans le temps à des moments clés de sa vie en regardant des photographies.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
David James Lewis
- Dave Bristol
- (as David Lewis)
Caeli MacAulay
- Baby Nick
- (as Caeli Macauley)
Malcolm Stewart
- Dr. Greenfield
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
The reason why the first movie was very good (I would call it even brilliant) was, that for first half an hour, you didn't know what's going on here. You saw Kutcher's childhood which was from time to time affected by blackouts and you didn't know what they are for there. As this is a sequel, the tension was missing and the guy even didn't have blackouts at all. Many times during the new movie I felt like watching the first movie and that the new one just changed a few things. For example, compare the prison scene and the scene on toilets. This movie lacks strong scenes, which are replaced by sex. Again, remember the first movie - burning of a dog, dynamite in a box, visit at Lenny's room in hospital etc. Those moments were breathtaking, quick and strong. What do you have in the second one? A lot of people hate the ending of this movie, but well...how would you end it? It would be a disgrace if it was pure happy-end and also, they couldn't do partial happy-end, if they didn't want to repeat themselves again. All in all, this flick is very mediocre and the comparing to the original movie pushes it even lower. I won't say "AVOID IT!", watch it on some evening when you want to watch TV but the only thing they broadcast is Big Brother.
Did the guy that made this even watch the first one? Probably not. A load of aspects from the first one such as blackouts in their youth have been removed. Plus seeing the main character in their childhood sorta made you connect more with the character. Here you learn nothing about the bland main characters whatsoever. Erica Durance does give a good performance, but then she always does but that doesn't diminish the fact that the way the script is written we learn nothing about the main characters. It isn't even "The Butterfly Effect" its just had a few elements of it thrown in there. Take that away and you've got a bland corporate thriller with nothing worth watching at all.
I had great expectations for the sequel to one of my favorite movies. When I learned it would be direct-to-video I worried. Such fears were more than confirmed. This movie, to put it bluntly is terrible when compared to the first. The plot is nonsensical, and takes place around a boring office environment. The acting is frigid, there is little character development, and predictably leads the viewer to little enjoyment, and lots of confusion.
It would appear the director of this film has not even seen the first one, considering the frequent mistakes, and plot jumps.
Save your money, skip this one. This possessed such great potential, but suffered such terribly delivery
It would appear the director of this film has not even seen the first one, considering the frequent mistakes, and plot jumps.
Save your money, skip this one. This possessed such great potential, but suffered such terribly delivery
Watching this movie, I really liked how it began, it had quality actors, the mechanics of the movie seemed to vary from the original, giving it a bit of uniqueness. I really liked the feel the director gave this film. Watching it I thought it had a lot of potential, and could very easily have a better story than the original, but then it starts unreasonably accelerating.
The movie was 75 minutes long. It's like I saw the condensed version. Did they cut the budget on this movie during filming? I've seen episodes of Smallville with bigger budgets than what this must have cost.
The movie was 75 minutes long. It's like I saw the condensed version. Did they cut the budget on this movie during filming? I've seen episodes of Smallville with bigger budgets than what this must have cost.
The original Butterfly Effect had many wonderful original aspects to it. The main character's abilities were explained in a sort of way that it was slightly believable and the movie was full of twists and turns that culminated in a satisfying and realistic ending. Sadly the sequel does not feature any of the elements that made the original so brilliant. Everything has been dumbed down , gaps in the storyline are almost insulting if you're a fan of the previous film and the amount of sex infused in this movie is unjustified for this storyline , it isn't placed to create an atmosphere like in Lord of War per say , it just seems thrown in because the director was clueless. There are no moment when your skin tingles , you are spoon fed the entire story , everything is very linear in a movie where the time-lines are supposed to be altered and the ending made me feel i needed a drink.
Just watch the first movie again or search for something else , this movie is one step away from being one of Uwe Boll's, a definite pass.
Just watch the first movie again or search for something else , this movie is one step away from being one of Uwe Boll's, a definite pass.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesDirector John R. Leonetti is the younger brother of Matthew F. Leonetti (the director of photography of L'effet papillon (2004)).
- GaffesWhen Nick is in the hospital after the first crash, he goes into a convulsion and the nurse runs in and hits the button and announces a "code blue". That should get every available doctor and nurse in the area to run into the room. Then the mother says he's alright now, yet the nurse never calls to reverse the code blue, and no-one shows up.
- Citations
Dave Bristol: [to Nick] You keep your shit together. Okay? I can't have you pop another brain fart and fuck this thing up.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Shameful Sequels: The Butterfly Effect 2 (2012)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Butterfly Effect 2?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 966 458 $US
- Durée1 heure 32 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant