911: In Plane Site

911: IN PLANE SITE has all of the answers, man! You thought that the terrorists hit the World Trade Center towers with passenger planes? Ha! It was the government, man! Just like they did at Pearl Harbor! All a ruse, just get us involved in a war!

Woah!

The Pentagon and WTC were bombed with bombs and missiles, dude! The evidence is clear! It was an inside job! Wake up and smell your President, man! This whole plot was pulled off by that well-known super-genius, George W. Bush! He and his hand-picked cabal of like-minded, ultra-brilliant psychopaths orchestrated the whole thing, man!

In league with the media and other world powers, that Machiavellian mastermind, George W. Bush, and his conspiring cadre of creeps concocted this calamitous catastrophe!

Where are the hidden videos? Why haven't they been released? The truth must come out! Only William Lewis cares enough to take on the nefarious powers that be! He's gathered the information, and only he knows what really happened on that dreadful day!

Our worst fears have been realized! Our leaders are all members of the "Common Purpose" organization! They're being trained to rule the world, man! This is why the transportation and education systems don't work! It's all part of the plan!

Spread the word, before it's too late! "It's A Cookbook!", "Keep watching the skies!", "Soylent Green is people!", "There is no spoon!". Amen, man...

It assumes you are naturally resistant to a conspiracy so large. It takes the viewer through a series of logical steps, using easily-available photographic evidence and published reports, and leads to what turns out - surprisingly - to be an inescapable conclusion. It really changed my view of the US military, who I had naturally assumed to be generally incompetent. Now, I have much more respect for their capabilities. It also explains why the neocons are given so much respect in the capitol. I won't say you'll be as convinced as I am. I had an open mind on the subject, and was simply waiting for the time and inclination to look into the facts. It's true I don't automatically accept the 'facts' presented by US govt officials and reported without comment by the media, but in all other ways my brain works quite normally. Whereas Michael Moore does not dispute the 'facts' presented by US govt officials (Chomsky-like), this movie just examines the hard evidence - and more importantly, examines it in a logical order. There is no jumping around, no confusing lists of names, none of that skull n bones and illuminati stuff. Just 'look at this picture, do you see what I see?' and 'if you see what I see, and nobody reports it, doesn't this imply a kind of conspiracy?'. It's a well-done, high-quality production.

911 in Plane Site (2004)

*** (out of 4)

Where do you begin with conspiracy theories? As host Dave von Kleist starts off by saying, people are going to have all sorts of different ideas on any subject. Some believe whatever they're told while others might see the truth as something different. No matter which side of the coin you're on it appears people like to use documentaries like this as "proof" to what they believe. If you think the plane that hit the World Trade Center had a missile on it then you're going to see the "proof" here and call it the truth. The other side will see the same footage here and come up with a different bit of "proof" that it's something else. These conspiracy theory documentaries have been released left and right with the most popular one being LOOSE CHANGE. I personally think this one here is handled a lot better and out of the two I'd certainly call this one the best. The film not only discusses the plane/missile into the World Trade Center but the big focus is on the plane that hit the Pentagon. Photo evidence is shown that it was impossible for a plane to have hit the building. The other big "item" here is that the second plane to hit the WTC was actually a government plane with a missile on it. They show the evidence, although I must admit that I was curious what happened to the people who were on the commercial flight that we were told hit the building. Again, people are going to go into these documentaries with their minds already made up. I try to be as open-minded as possible and while the film does make you think, I think there are still way too many loose ends to call this an absolute fact.

I have seen a lot of movies on the 9-11 cover up. however, this one probably sums up the endless proof the best. Also I do believe that Van Kliest was the first person to notice the pod and the missile flash before the planes hit the tower. Good call man. sometimes the best place to hide something is right in front of your face! Just one quick comment on the flashes. It is absolutely irrefutable that the flash happens before the first plane hits. The second one is controversial. However, if the flash really is the fuselage sparking off the tower wouldn't the wings also spark????? When you view the footage the rest of the plane goes in without any flash.

Don't listen to these people that are saying this movie is terrible. They are in denial. Take the red pill and do some research.

Although a bit dated, the facts set forth in this documentary are truly valid. They have been documented from a number of sources ranging from lay comment to expert testimony verified by video footage of the day's events. Although there are now a number of more recent documentaries that expose the myths set forth in the 911 Commission Report even further, this is a must see. As is stated in the beginning of the film, denial is a common response so I suggest viewing with an open mind. Other documentaries on the subject include: Loose Change (also 2nd Edition and Final Cut) 911 Mysteries (Part 1, Demolition) Other parts pending.