Melissa P.

I saw very little of the book in this film, this is not to say that this alone makes for a poor movie. As a matter of fact it was better that the book despite the fact that I still thought it was awful. I personally feel that the only reason any one bothered to make this book into a film was because of the shock value. Melissa's sexual exploits were for the most part disgusting and whatever was left over was disturbing. I'm not prude but that book nauseated me, and the movie wasn't much better. At least the movie had some kind of a story. The book was more or less a detailed list of all the raunchy things she had done in her past, there was no connection between her and any part of her family. No mention of the grandmother that figures quite largely into the movie's plot, not a peep. All in all if you have the choice between the movie or the book pick the movie, at least it is shorter.

I was flipping around for something to watch since I was bored. Saw this. Sicily, which is a place I love and visited many times, a good director, some erotica from a young female perspective, and so I thought eh, why not?

And although I was not really bored and there are some good things about this movie, it is not a well time spent and I cannot recommend.

First the good; María Valverde is excellent. She play her lead role brilliantly with a mix of sexual awakening, teenage angst, sometimes adult, sometimes a kid, and with a great range of emotions. The sexual scenes (rather hinted at scenes) were also handled really good, with nothing but some breasts showing, and acted really well. I also think this is a thoughtful movie in many ways, or at least it tries to be. The sexual awakening of young females is not so often depicted in movies, and here it is shown (or: tries to show) some of the traps that comes with it. It is really hard to become a teenager and wanting sex, but also wanting love and closeness, and not fully being able to differentiate between the two. Something that often lead us to make mistakes growing up and also go looking for love/sex in the wrong places. We have all been through it, strange that parents are not able to convey it properly over the generations and teach their young a bit more about reality. But it is not easy being parent, and the young filled with hormones seldom listen.

It is also here the negatives start.

Although the movie tries to tell the story I draw up in the positives above, it fails. Partly it is the acting of the rest of the cast which, with perhaps only one exception, is pretty bad. Partly the writing is way off and is basically only saved by María playing the character of Melissa to perfection, but she cannot save this movie, nor is it saved by its good intention. The directing misses are also there, which is weird since I really love Guadagnino as a director but this is one of his first films so perhaps that is why. The movie also show very little of Sicily which was the main reason I watched it. This could basically have been filmed anywhere. The sets are not very good, the light is off, the sound design is seldom on point, the music bland and seem very random. The great and slightly creepy dungeon scene with all the boys which is very well done is unfortunately the only excellent exception since the entire design of this movie, from the set, to clothes, to directing, to music, to acting, it is all amateurish and subpar. Sadly all the negatives also hide the good intention of the movie and make it into a failure.

I am being very generous giving this movie a 6/10, because I cannot recommend this to anyone. However I really love the main actress - Oscars level of acting! And I like the intention of the movie and what they tried to do deserve an extra point. If you watch this, keep expectations down and enjoy María's acting and you might get some positives out of it.

First-off, the only reason I'm writing this is because the 4.3 rating is almost impossible. I mean the direction and cinematography by itself will get this movie to a 6. No, I haven't read the book and I genuinely do not believe that the movie should be rated as per the adaptation from the book. The performances standing out are Melissa (of course) and her grandmother. The music and cinematography have a presence of their own throughout the movie. And the plot never gets boring or unrealistic, given a slightly open imagination. If you're aged anywhere between 15 and 35 I would highly recommend a viewing. The only reason I gave it an 8/10 is because we have movies like Fight Club and Animatrix.

I saw many embarrassed and even angry reviews on this film, which were pushing me off the chair, and i wanna talk not about the film itself, but the topic it chose. Because that caught me in memories of my youth, that is what also makes a great film, the script, and I can't be grateful enough for this made me remember.

The film is not as much of a fiction as many would like it to be. In very realistic way discloses the hyper-sensitivity of youth, the feelings, the special way everything is coming to a man's brain, the sex, the colors, messed up thoughts...and then here are decisions. It is wonderful how Melissa always want to choose what to do with her life, what to feel, how to act, what to search for, but somehow the change is only in her deeds but not in her inside, her diary pickups are often in disharmony with what happens to her afterwards. But although she is in fact doing this to herself, she is just so full of it! And so she is coping with her teenage pain as rational as she can in her age. Of course, the sex. When you don't know what it is, but you want it badly. She is less self-aware then the character played by Liv Tyler in Stealing Beauty, but much more pro-active. She doesn't let situations pass by, she is grabbing what she can of them, she does not wait in a corner. That's what i liked at Melissa. The cruelty of acts and the sweetness of the inside. Unsplittable. And that this movie is more real than a sweet romance movie. It is of the age - if she were a little more older, the tender detailed camera would lost its narrative function. And maybe the casting would pickup another actress.

Anyway, I love it more and more. It's telling exactly the teen story, which have been missed.

(2005) Melissa P.

(In Italian with English subtitles) BIO DRAMA

Adapted from a memoir or autobiography "One Hundred Strokes of the Brush Before Bed" by Melissa Panarello detailing at least a year of her journey of sexual experiences by the month of the weather. Co-written and directed by Luca Guadagnino that opens with Melissa played by María Valverde as she is also the narrator starting with "Summer" as viewers are hearing what she has written on her diary with the last day of the school year, both her and her best friend, Manuela Bozzini (Letizia Ciampa) are invited to Daniela's pool house. Daniela also happens to be the guy Melissa has a crush on, he is played by Primo Reggiani, and in the movie, he appears to be arrogant, self absorbed and an ego maniac, which rises to the question why would anyone be attracted to someone like that in the first place. And throughout the entire movie Daniele treats her terrible. Anyways, there is someone who is capable to treat and be with her for the right reasons, his name is Marco De Angelis (Nilo Mur) for it is just a matter of time of when she notices him. The more Melissa's sexual awakening is ignored by her mom as her dad is always away because of work required him to be overseas, the only family member she has the most rapport with happens to be her grandmother, Elvira (Geraldine Chaplin). Melissa's tart behavior worsens as soon as her grandmother is sent to a care home.

I do not know how the author herself thought about the movie, but I thought the makers did a poor job addressing how Daniele's other peers thought about the supposedly most popular teenager he is sought since he is supposed to be the wealthiest or the one girls want the most as their are only two teens on Melissa's peer group who are tall and appear to treat female counterparts like dirt. And if anyone were to watch this, you can tell the author herself was not even credited as a consultant as the movie was supposed to be about her and what she had written in her diaries/ memoir.