[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
IMDbPro

Le chemin de la destruction

Titre original : Path of Destruction
  • Téléfilm
  • 2005
  • Not Rated
  • 2h
NOTE IMDb
3,6/10
697
MA NOTE
Le chemin de la destruction (2005)
ActionAventureDrameScience-fictionThriller

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueThe movie opens with a faulty nanotechnology experiment that results in a massive, deadly explosion. The company's CEO manages to sidestep blame by framing a meddling young reporter (Katheri... Tout lireThe movie opens with a faulty nanotechnology experiment that results in a massive, deadly explosion. The company's CEO manages to sidestep blame by framing a meddling young reporter (Katherine), who now holds the only surviving evidence needed to expose the truth. All the while, ... Tout lireThe movie opens with a faulty nanotechnology experiment that results in a massive, deadly explosion. The company's CEO manages to sidestep blame by framing a meddling young reporter (Katherine), who now holds the only surviving evidence needed to expose the truth. All the while, the dangerous nanoparticles - having escaped from the explosion into the stratosphere - th... Tout lire

  • Réalisation
    • Stephen Furst
  • Scénario
    • Chase Parker
  • Casting principal
    • Danica McKellar
    • David Keith
    • Chris Pratt
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    3,6/10
    697
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Stephen Furst
    • Scénario
      • Chase Parker
    • Casting principal
      • Danica McKellar
      • David Keith
      • Chris Pratt
    • 22avis d'utilisateurs
    • 2avis des critiques
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Photos3

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux16

    Modifier
    Danica McKellar
    Danica McKellar
    • Katherine Stern
    David Keith
    David Keith
    • Roy Stark
    Chris Pratt
    Chris Pratt
    • Nathan McCain
    Stephen Furst
    Stephen Furst
    • Terry
    Franklin Dennis Jones
    Franklin Dennis Jones
    • Colonel Thomas Miller
    Richard Wharton
    Richard Wharton
    • Dr. Van Owen
    Ray Baker
    Ray Baker
    Ryan Spike Dauner
    • Lab Coat #1
    Michael Cory Davis
    Michael Cory Davis
    • Eric
    Griff Furst
    Griff Furst
    • Krieger
    • (as Griffith Feuerstein)
    Vladimir Kolev
    • P-17 Pilot
    Jeff Rank
    • Father
    Atanas Srebrev
    Atanas Srebrev
    • Purcell
    Jonas Talkington
    • Mount Weather Tech
    Raicho Vasilev
    • Bodyguard
    Julian Vergov
    Julian Vergov
    • Lab Worker #2
    • Réalisation
      • Stephen Furst
    • Scénario
      • Chase Parker
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs22

    3,6697
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    3ManiacCop

    If you love bad movies, then is takes the cake

    This movie is hilariously bad. From the very beginning, you know you're in for a gut busting ride of bad script writing, acting, directing and gaping plot holes that boggle the mind. If you enjoy laughing at poorly made tripe, than this is your type of movie. If you want to watch a movie with a somewhat believable plot and some point, then you might want to rent something more mainstream.

    I watched this with my brother last night at 1am on sci fi. We knew what we were getting into. From the absurd dialogue to sheer convenience of certain events, you will get your fair share of 'writing class no-no's'. Anyways, this movie, taken for what it's worth (production value, acting and sheer lunacy), can be tolerated and watched. Once only though. NO ONE has that much time.
    b_movies2005

    Made for TV SciFi Thriller that falls short.

    The comments from the honorable member from California pretty much sum this movie up, except he missed the most important factor, Danica McKellar. With Danica in the movie, it made it all worthwhile. Heck, I have seen far worse movies with worse actors than this movie. B_Movies are just that, b movies and should be taken with a grain of salt, not torn apart for the lack of technical goodies. Heaven knows we have enough of those already. As for me, I hope it makes it to DVD. The last time I checked Amazon, it wasn't there, not yet anyway. Fans of Danica, let your voices be heard, demand this one make it to DVD. To be fair, it does fall a little short in areas, but good old David is making an effort, but he seems to be doing a lot of bad films, also playing the bad guy way too much. Michael Cory Davis does a good job with what he was handed to work with. Watch with an open mind is all I can.
    1Jeff Softley

    David Keith is slumming

    Although it looks like he did only 2 or 3 days of work on this utter shlockfest of a Sci-Fi Channel piece of junk, poor David Keith has his name attached to this garbage. At least he's working and drawing a check, but it's a long way from the Brubaker days ...

    This sci-fi mess should be required viewing for all films students: as an example of what a film looks like when things go completely wrong. The production design is all but nonexistent, the direction is sloppy and terrible at the same time, the acting is as bad as it gets, and the script sounds like an 11th grade English class did it as a week-long project, an hour at a time over five days.

    I'm still waiting for the David Keith / Keith David co-starrer. These are two good actors when they get good material, and they've suffered long enough in the B-movie realm. Tarantino, are you listening?
    4MartianOctocretr5

    Path of demented plot holes

    Some weird things that look like a swarm of black CGI marks try to take over the world. An accident releases them at some off-shore drilling place which they wreck, and then they wander off to destroy more things.

    Beautiful Danika McKellar is the most memorable part of the movie. Not only is she incredibly cute, but her acting is top notch in spite of the plot-hole ridden script. She's a journalist who happened to be at the site of the first accident, and apparently there's some icky evil government plot behind the creatures, so a bunch of thugs everywhere are after her. There are numerous clichés of this kind thrown around, but there are a few spots of action that almost make sense in this thing.

    The science is whack. The things destroy stuff in ways that are bizarre and inconsistent. The way the heroes try to combat the things is almost comical. If you watch this as a joke in an MST3K sort of way, it can be entertaining on that basis. I just hope Danika gets some better roles in the future.
    5bobwildhorror

    Sci Fi Channel Does It Again

    Okay, okay...I know my summary says it all. Another Sci Fi Channel "original." Well, wait just a minute folks; this one actually seems to have a grain of originality.

    I'm afraid the nanotechnology concept is where it ends, though. Bad acting. Horrible CGI. Ridiculous plot twists. Starring Winnie and directed by Flounder.

    But this one is so horribly bad, folks, that it's entertaining. We're not talking PLAN 9 bad, but pretty close. Another reviewer indicated that this may have been intentional, but I'm not buying it. For those of you that enjoy this kind of thing, buy some beer, turn off your mind, relax and float down stream.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    The Extreme Team
    3,4
    The Extreme Team
    Walk the Talk
    5,6
    Walk the Talk
    Saucisses à tout prix
    4,2
    Saucisses à tout prix
    Cursed Part 3
    6,0
    Cursed Part 3
    The Perfect Pant from Open to Close
    The Perfect Pant from Open to Close
    Les associées
    6,2
    Les associées
    Strangers with Candy
    5,9
    Strangers with Candy
    Deep in the Valley
    4,4
    Deep in the Valley
    Timms Valley
    6,4
    Timms Valley
    7,7
    Mr. Payback
    Pringles: Mr. P
    5,8
    Pringles: Mr. P
    The Multi-Hyphenate
    3,6
    The Multi-Hyphenate

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Gaffes
      Blackhawk helicopters have a main rotor and a tail rotor. They require both rotors to fly. The helicopter pilot states that the helicopter lost one of its rotors; yet the aircraft continues flying.

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 24 septembre 2005 (États-Unis)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Death Cloud
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Seattle, Washington, États-Unis
    • Sociétés de production
      • Armored Productions
      • BUFO
      • Curmudgeon Films
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 1 800 000 $US (estimé)
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      2 heures
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • Stereo
    • Rapport de forme
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.