Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueIn this live made-for-TV adaptation, elderly Norman Thayer copes with age and the nearing of death; middle-aged Chelsea tries to build a belated father-daughter bond; and her boyfriend Bill'... Tout lireIn this live made-for-TV adaptation, elderly Norman Thayer copes with age and the nearing of death; middle-aged Chelsea tries to build a belated father-daughter bond; and her boyfriend Bill's teenage son deals with parental divorce.In this live made-for-TV adaptation, elderly Norman Thayer copes with age and the nearing of death; middle-aged Chelsea tries to build a belated father-daughter bond; and her boyfriend Bill's teenage son deals with parental divorce.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Nommé pour 1 Primetime Emmy
- 2 nominations au total
Photos
Avis à la une
The first care is not compare it with the original. Because it fights to be different; and it just wins.
It is different for a sort of swet melancholia.
For the beautiful connection between Julie Andrews and Christopher Plummer.
For the dialogue of ages.
And , sure, for teaspons of nice to touching humor.
In short, it is just one of film deserving to be loved because, in more measure than the version Hepburn- Fonda, offers a dialogue with audience about small significant things defining the life in its essence.
In short, just delightful and the joy to feel yourself just fine seeing, like the fruit of a good tea cup is just, in my case, less, mmore than precious.
It is different for a sort of swet melancholia.
For the beautiful connection between Julie Andrews and Christopher Plummer.
For the dialogue of ages.
And , sure, for teaspons of nice to touching humor.
In short, it is just one of film deserving to be loved because, in more measure than the version Hepburn- Fonda, offers a dialogue with audience about small significant things defining the life in its essence.
In short, just delightful and the joy to feel yourself just fine seeing, like the fruit of a good tea cup is just, in my case, less, mmore than precious.
Chris and Julie... together again. And Julie is still as beautiful as ever. This movie was very cute! It was done live and there were FEW mistakes! The movie had the odd boring patches, but all in all was pretty wonderful. I recommend it if it comes on TV again. Out of 10, I rate is 7.
There is so much talk about the poor ratings this movies received that its good qualities have been largely ignored. It should be a great pleasure and honor for the public to have Mr. Plummer perform live on TV. He is one of the only great actors left from the generation of theater actors that included Jason Robards and George C Scott. Of course, the public is as always ignorant and most people prefer to watch trashy programs such as the survivor. In this movie, both Plummer and Andrews were superb as was Glenne Headly. In this era of trashy movies and low life so called actors such as Tom Green, David Spade, and Adam Sandler, who all should be working together in a Burger Joint instead of making films, it's refreshing to have such a good play performed live on TV. Plummer is a true treasure in this movie as he was in the last year's film the Insider and in American Tragedy. We hope to see more of him in the future.
It's great to see a live play on television again...especially this play, with theatre/movie/TV legends Julie Andrews and Christopher Plummer. And Julie even gets to sing. . .Personally, the couple reminds me of my 60ish parents. . .but beyond that, this is a wonderful treat for us baby-boomers who sort of grew up with live/live-on-tape TV, who also love live theatre. Julie is beautiful and emotional and real. Plummer is morbid and hateful and opinionated. . .and how many times have we heard "bull-s**t" on network TV. . .at last, TV has grown up.
After singularly disappointing made-for-TV remakes of "South Pacific" and "Murder on the Orient Express" during the last two months, I expected the live TV production of "On Golden Pond" to be just as much of a let-down. Nothing could be further from the truth. If not the original, in no way does this disappoint.
As the central couple, Ethel and Norman Thayer, Julie Andrews and Christopher Plummer still have real on-screen magic together, with Plummer particularly outstanding. Gleanne Headley may not have had as much fire and spunk as Jane Fonda did as their daughter Chelsea, but she's no less good for all that. In truth, all the performances are solid, as is the elaborate cabin set, the latter all the more astounding when you realize that it was created indoors.
I sincerely hope that this is issued on video before long. I'll definitely buy it for inclusion beside my copy of the original. For, clearly, that's where it belongs.
Bravo to Andrews, Plummer, and everyone involved with this superior production!
As the central couple, Ethel and Norman Thayer, Julie Andrews and Christopher Plummer still have real on-screen magic together, with Plummer particularly outstanding. Gleanne Headley may not have had as much fire and spunk as Jane Fonda did as their daughter Chelsea, but she's no less good for all that. In truth, all the performances are solid, as is the elaborate cabin set, the latter all the more astounding when you realize that it was created indoors.
I sincerely hope that this is issued on video before long. I'll definitely buy it for inclusion beside my copy of the original. For, clearly, that's where it belongs.
Bravo to Andrews, Plummer, and everyone involved with this superior production!
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis was telecast live on CBS, which was rare for a television theatrical presentation after the invention of videotape in the late 1950s. It was performed on the same Television City stage in Los Angeles, California that was home to The Carol Burnett Show (1967).
- ConnexionsReferenced in TV's Most Censored Moments (2002)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant