Beyond the Wall of Sleep

Everything about this movie sucked. How can someone even think this was good? The acting made my eyes bleed, the plot was just retarded, and the characters were just so stupid, I wanted them all to just die right then and there. This movie was suppose to be a horror flick, but it ended out being a comedy for me. Me and my friends just laughed at how terrible this movie was. The visual effects were the worst i've ever seen in a movie. Even if the budget wasn't that high, they still could of made it better. I mean come on, honestly, why did they waste movie and time making such a bad movie? I feel bad for everyone who lost an hour and 25 minutes of their life like I did. I want it back!

so, I've sat through all of ed wood's films, and i'm still convinced this is the worst film I've ever seen, but also the most hilarious. the acting is sub-sub-sub-community theatre/high school acting class on a bad day style, and the directing appears as if the directors (it took two people to be this awful!) just got a bunch of new equipment and computer programs they wanted to screw around with. if you want a good laugh, and some great new catchphrases, and don't mind having no idea what a film is about and sitting through crappy scene upon crappy scene, then check this movie out. as horrible as it is, i almost recommend watching it to be flabbergasted by how awful the three main performances are. check out the wig on edward! i certainly hope tom savini was at least supplied with a delicious lunch for appearing in this trash.

In a normal movie, if your cinematography, lighting, acting, editing, script, sound mix and everything are abysmal, you try to fix them. But in a low budget horror movie, you can claim that's part of the TERRIFYING HORROR. This was badly shot in kind of a faux-Blair Witch style, with ugly high contrast lighting, sub-high school drama acting, jumpy headache-enducing editing, awful dialogue (not even good in that verbose Lovecraft way) and...I don't particularly remember the sound, but I'm sure it was bad. If your movie's mise-en-scene is "shittiness", you're not scary. You're just shitty.

Every time I go to a screening of student films, I wonder about the people who's movies are incompetent even after years of schooling. "Do these people really think they can work in the industry?" I wonder.

Apparently, the answer is yes.

They grow up to be Barrett J. Leigh and Thom Maurer.

Even though the H.P. Lovecraft is a great author, the person who directed makes bad films and makes a mockery of his books. This movie has the worst acting i have ever seen. Though, i will give it credit for its comic relief, but i can't not say it was the worst movie i've ever bought and regret it. So my words of wisdom are "don't buy this movie", you can rent it but don't buy it, it doesn't deserve to be next to Fight Club or even Josie and the Pussycats. The ending however came to a bit surprise, it was the only good part of the movie. I not going to tell you what happens, but if you want to follow along with the story a little better i recommend reading the book because its hard to follow. My overall rating: 3.

Boooo Hissss..... I want the last 2 hours of my life back. I think a majority of the budget went to the cover and the 10 second CGI. The acting was over the top, so melodramatic....I kept waiting and waiting and waiting....and waiting and waiting some more.....ehhhh....not even good enough to be creepy. I felt like had this movie the budget and the time, it could have been a lot better. Of course, that is true of almost any movie, but the story in this one wasn't the biggest of the problems. The acting seriously was like watching an uncomfortable Shakespeare play done by the local playhouse. Actually, that was a huge rip on local playhouse actors. The best part was William Sanderson, who does his best to rescue a sinking boat.