[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Mysterious Object at Noon

Titre original : Dokfa nai meuman
  • 2000
  • Tous publics
  • 1h 29min
NOTE IMDb
6,7/10
1,8 k
MA NOTE
Mysterious Object at Noon (2000)
Dokfa Nai Meuman: Photographs (Us)
Lire clip1:36
Regarder Dokfa Nai Meuman: Photographs (Us)
1 Video
30 photos
DocumentaryDramaFantasyMysteryRomanceSci-Fi

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA film crew documents a folk story-exquisite corpse combination by random Thai people; the story is reenacted.A film crew documents a folk story-exquisite corpse combination by random Thai people; the story is reenacted.A film crew documents a folk story-exquisite corpse combination by random Thai people; the story is reenacted.

  • Réalisation
    • Apichatpong Weerasethakul
  • Casting principal
    • Duangjai Hiransri
    • Khom Kongkiat Khomsiri
    • Saisiri Xoomsai
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    6,7/10
    1,8 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Apichatpong Weerasethakul
    • Casting principal
      • Duangjai Hiransri
      • Khom Kongkiat Khomsiri
      • Saisiri Xoomsai
    • 11avis d'utilisateurs
    • 48avis des critiques
    • 74Métascore
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
    • Récompenses
      • 4 victoires et 4 nominations au total

    Vidéos1

    Dokfa Nai Meuman: Photographs (Us)
    Clip 1:36
    Dokfa Nai Meuman: Photographs (Us)

    Photos29

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 25
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux3

    Modifier
    Duangjai Hiransri
      Khom Kongkiat Khomsiri
      Saisiri Xoomsai
      • Réalisation
        • Apichatpong Weerasethakul
      • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
      • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

      Avis des utilisateurs11

      6,71.8K
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10

      Avis à la une

      Sinnerman

      Innovation does not a good movie make

      "Mysterious" held much dramatic promise.

      But because of its hybrid innovation, I'm at a lost as to rate it as a dramatic feature or a documentary film. Either way, despite its critical accolades, it wasn't able to interest me enough to wanna cradle its inadequacies. Poor film making craft is inexcusable even if this feature is excusably in a league of its own. (And did anyone catch a moment of Ozu homage in one of the scenes, with children walking by at one end and the camera placed at another? Nice...)

      That said, there were undeniable moments of brilliance in it. Two standouts come to mind; The "banter" between the two mute girls and that staged re-enactment by the villagers. And it shown the director to be one who knows how to capture such cinematic sparks, albeit inconsistently.

      I thus hope to see "Blissfully yours" before I decide on my regard for Apichatpong Weerasethakul as a film maker. Similarly, "Mysterious" will be given the benefit of the doubt. For honestly, it just didn't hack it for me right now.
      3phobophob

      exhausting

      i took my girlfriend to see this one after reading a very promising article about it in my monthly cinema newspaper. i regretted it after about 15 minutes of the movie. the main idea to it, to let a story develop by it's protagonists, thus making it a semi documentary, seems promising, but suffers under the usual problems movies have that relay on their actors as directors. they are non. so the movie is constantly on the verge of failure, while thru most parts being plain - i am sorry, but i have to use that word - boring. it is, as the short movies of weerasethakul, heavily based on long steady shots and seemingly unconnected pieces of sound and dialog. this may work as an installative work in an art context but definitely fails to deliver when watching it for about 90 minutes in a cinema. the only refreshing moments of the movie are the ones of self reference. one in which one assistant of the director appears, telling him that the whole thing does not work and that they better should have written a script, and one in which a kid actor is asking if he finally can go home (and if not, if afterwords he at least can get a burger at kfc :). i have to admit i really felt with the kid.
      7aptpupil79

      interesting film experiment

      there's no real easy way to classify or summarize this movie. at its core there is a story that is developed by many (unrelated) people picking up where the last person left off...a creative game of sorts. the "story" of the film unfolds as villagers of different parts of thailand see fit (with the final cut going to the director, of course). we see not only the creators of the story developing the story that they did not begin, but also the story itself acted out by actors or village people, or sometimes not at all. it's a film experiment more than a film and should be approached as such. the last 15 minutes of the film is more of a documentary of thai people than about the story that has been evolving over the course of the film. it's an interesting view, but not great in any way. C+
      5jordondave-28085

      Some times off topic and meandering on the myth of Dogfahr

      (2000) Mysterious Object at Noon DOCU DRAMA

      Documented by Apichatpong Weerasethakul where he goes around uncovering a myth involving a student on a wheelchair and his teacher "Dogfahr". Filmed in black and white, sometimes the stories are made up while others are being told to and from other people throughout the entire city of Bangkok and Thailand. Viewers are left scratching their heads trying to figure what to make of it as a portion of the docudrama is sometimes off topic. We do not even get to see what is even written about the myth whether Dogfahr was actually dead or alive, or do we even get to visit the site that was supposed to have happened.
      chaos-rampant

      Fish sauce abhidharma

      An interesting film, more for the idea behind it and moments captured than the overall execution.

      A filmmaker rolls around town in search of a story, making the film we see. It begins with long footage of driving around Bangkok, then we segue to the story proper with a woman being interviewed, asked about a story.

      The story is made-up, the point is not the story of course, but dismantling the conventional telling. Different people are interviewed who bend the story to their fancy, adding stuff. We are not entirely sure who among them are actors coached on what to say, who are passers-by blurting out what comes in their heads. We can tell that some of it was obviously blocked to be filmed, some covertly staged as real and some stolen from glances but the whole is pretty seamless.

      This is an opportunity to film all sorts of activities and splice it together to see what kind of sense comes out; among them an amateur theatric production of the story, a simulated TV interview filmed off the TV, (faux?) newsreel footage, real scenes of boxing, a singing contest and sex show, a scene from the film but the camera keeps rolling through the break. When the crippled boy is assigned a random background by one of the interviewees, in the following scene his teacher acquires the same background of war and family loss.

      In the West, we have similar films of stories about stories in Saragossa Manuscript and such, where usually the point is structure, hidden meaning and the divination of self.

      In the East, specifically Thailand, they have their own traditions of light storytelling and meta-narrative sorting of concepts, both defined by cultural proximity to India. Among the three 'holy' texts of their native Buddhism is a body of work called Abhidharma, teachings about the teachings. Composed after the Buddha's time, commentaries upon commentaries form a complex, layered web of cataloguing various ontological attributes of reality, phenomena and self. Boring if you ever try to read it.

      On a historical note, there is evidence that abhidharmic influence in the north of India in turn rippled West through Persia to influence gnostic thought, and East through the Silk Road as both reaction to its scholasticism and elaboration of it contributed to early Chinese Buddhism. In both cases, the distinction is made between mere intellectual reasoning in the abhidharmic vein, and expansive meditative wisdom that looks directly at things. (respectively, gnosis and prajna)

      Anyway, the film has no direct link to all that except as pointing to the mesh of meta-narrative.

      And it's cool to note that springing from a Buddhist background, in this film of stories about stories the stories are transient, illusory confabulations, there's no intrinsic meaning or symbolism to them, there's no structure beyond co-dependent arising of narrator and image, and the narrator is neither a single self nor on some journey to enlightenment. Nice, if you don't burden yourself with futilely trying to organize the tangle, just directly look at the wondrous nothingness.

      The last story is made-up by schoolchildren, collapsing in a fantastical, meaningless heap of witch tigers and magical swords, illusory child's play.

      The closing shots are of children kicking a ball, the rush of actual life outside the stories which is the most mysterious object of all.

      Vous aimerez aussi

      Cemetery of Splendour
      6,8
      Cemetery of Splendour
      Syndromes and a Century
      7,3
      Syndromes and a Century
      Mekong Hotel
      6,1
      Mekong Hotel
      Blissfully Yours
      6,9
      Blissfully Yours
      Insiang
      7,5
      Insiang
      Tropical Malady
      7,1
      Tropical Malady
      La loi de la frontière
      6,7
      La loi de la frontière
      La Flûte de roseau
      7,2
      La Flûte de roseau
      Platform
      7,4
      Platform
      Oncle Boonmee (celui qui se souvient de ses vies antérieures)
      6,7
      Oncle Boonmee (celui qui se souvient de ses vies antérieures)
      Lewat Djam Malam
      7,1
      Lewat Djam Malam
      On Blue
      8,2
      On Blue

      Histoire

      Modifier

      Le saviez-vous

      Modifier
      • Anecdotes
        Filming was carried out for three years with a volunteer crew, and only stopped when the camera broke down - the last shot of the movie is literally the last piece of film that passed through the camera.
      • Connexions
        Featured in 40 Days to Learn Film (2020)

      Meilleurs choix

      Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
      Se connecter

      FAQ13

      • How long is Mysterious Object at Noon?Alimenté par Alexa

      Détails

      Modifier
      • Date de sortie
        • 27 janvier 2016 (France)
      • Pays d’origine
        • Thaïlande
        • Pays-Bas
      • Langues
        • Thai
        • Langues des signes
      • Aussi connu sous le nom de
        • Heavenly Flower in Devil's Hand
      • Sociétés de production
        • 9/6 Cinema Factory
        • Firecracker Film
        • Fuji Photo Film, Thailand
      • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

      Spécifications techniques

      Modifier
      • Durée
        1 heure 29 minutes
      • Couleur
        • Black and White
      • Mixage
        • Dolby
      • Rapport de forme
        • 1.37 : 1(original 16mm negative ratio)

      Contribuer à cette page

      Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
      Mysterious Object at Noon (2000)
      Lacune principale
      By what name was Mysterious Object at Noon (2000) officially released in India in English?
      Répondre
      • Voir plus de lacunes
      • En savoir plus sur la contribution
      Modifier la page

      Découvrir

      Récemment consultés

      Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
      Obtenir l'application IMDb
      Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
      Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
      Obtenir l'application IMDb
      Pour Android et iOS
      Obtenir l'application IMDb
      • Aide
      • Index du site
      • IMDbPro
      • Box Office Mojo
      • Licence de données IMDb
      • Salle de presse
      • Annonces
      • Emplois
      • Conditions d'utilisation
      • Politique de confidentialité
      • Your Ads Privacy Choices
      IMDb, une société Amazon

      © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.