Scooby-Doo
- 2002
- Tous publics
- 1h 29min
Suite à une séparation acerbe, la bande Mystery Inc. sont amenés l'un après l'autre à un lieu de vacances sur une île, afin d'enquêter des choses étranges.Suite à une séparation acerbe, la bande Mystery Inc. sont amenés l'un après l'autre à un lieu de vacances sur une île, afin d'enquêter des choses étranges.Suite à une séparation acerbe, la bande Mystery Inc. sont amenés l'un après l'autre à un lieu de vacances sur une île, afin d'enquêter des choses étranges.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 5 victoires et 14 nominations au total
Miguel A. Núñez Jr.
- Voodoo Maestro
- (as Miguel A. Nunez Jr.)
Charles Stan Frazier
- Sugar Ray
- (as Stan Frazier)
Craig Bullock
- Sugar Ray
- (as DJ Homicide)
Matthew Murphy Karges
- Sugar Ray
- (as Murphy Karges)
Charlie Cousins
- Velma's Friend
- (as Charles Cousins)
Neil Fanning
- Scooby
- (voix)
Résumé
Reviewers say 'Scooby-Doo' offers nostalgic value with Matthew Lillard's praised Shaggy portrayal. The film is appreciated for its faithful character representation but criticized for a weak plot and subpar CGI. Deviations from the cartoon's formula and inconsistent acting are noted. The humor is seen as juvenile, and the blend of kid-friendly content with adult humor is both a strength and a flaw. It's an entertaining yet flawed adaptation appealing more to original series fans.
Avis à la une
This movie works because it tries to mimic the cartoon in many ways. Even the first shot looks like the first shot of the cartoon with the fog and the creepy old house. I had originally thought that the CGI Scooby would bother me during the movie, but I was completely wrong. I only really thought about that the first time Scooby is shown. After that the dog was Scooby to me because the things he says and the way he says them are accurate to the cartoon. The movie is pure cheese, but so was the cartoon. "Scooby-Doo" has maybe the most effective farting scene since "Blazing Saddles." Most fart scenes just come off as gross and not very funny, but in the world of Scooby a fart scene works. One interesting aspect of the film was seeing Rowan Atkinson in a role where he actually talks...a lot! I hope he gets more chances at dialogue-heavy roles here in the States. Fred, Daphne, Velma and Shaggy all feel like their cartoon counterparts adding to the effectiveness of the movie. Lillard is amazing as Shaggy because he gets his voice to sound like a carbon-copy of the cartoon Shaggy. This is a fun movie to watch because you can turn your brain off and just enjoy the show.
It's been 16 years since this movie came out, and I decided to watch it after browsing the Netflix library while being high. I was looking for the dumbest possible movie to watch, and thought Scooby Doo should do.
Boy, like, how wrong was I? Never knew this was actually a stoner movie. I think it's silly enough to be fun if you watch it sober, but if you're high - it's awesome. Just stack up on scooby snacks and enjoy the ride!
Boy, like, how wrong was I? Never knew this was actually a stoner movie. I think it's silly enough to be fun if you watch it sober, but if you're high - it's awesome. Just stack up on scooby snacks and enjoy the ride!
This is probably the best live action adaptation of an animated show. It manages to evolve the original show into and idea that really fits the characters and one that we hadnt seen up to that point. The humor is also a positive for the movie, while it is clearly aimed at kids, it also adds a lot of clever and funny adult jokes which you can laugh at almost any time. Overall, a really good adaptation of the OG show.
Years ago, I watched and loved both "The Brady Bunch Movie" and "A Very Brady Sequel". Why? Because instead of just trying to recreate the original characters, the filmmakers made a very funny film that poked fun at the characters and plots of the original show. Had they simply made a movie with Brady characters it would have been pretty dull.
I mention this about the Brady movies because the movie "Scooby-Doo" manages to work for much the same reason. Yes, it brings back characters folks loved as kids...but it also pokes gentle fun at the trops from the old cartoon series. It also featues an ending that is hilarious because it picks up on fan's and what they really want from a reboot...and it works very well...though I'll say no more because I don't want to spoil the film for you. Well worth seeing and fun.
I mention this about the Brady movies because the movie "Scooby-Doo" manages to work for much the same reason. Yes, it brings back characters folks loved as kids...but it also pokes gentle fun at the trops from the old cartoon series. It also featues an ending that is hilarious because it picks up on fan's and what they really want from a reboot...and it works very well...though I'll say no more because I don't want to spoil the film for you. Well worth seeing and fun.
This film is nowhere near as bad as the rating suggests, sure it isn't flawless, but a good film doesn't need to be that to be enjoyable. I thought Scooby Doo a colourful film, with some good direction, and very good performances from all involved. The best of the cast were Matthew Lilliard as Shaggy and Sarah Michelle Gellar as Daphne, and Rowan Atkinson is amusing as Mondavarious. The film is very amusing at times, especially the scene when Scooby dresses as a Grandma and the scenes in the haunted house. The actress of Mary-Jane is very sweet too. But I will say that the film isn't without its flaws. The plot is a little far-fetched, and some of the farting jokes are very silly. There have been complaints of the Scooby Doo model being charmless, but I disagree. He was quite sweet at times. The only character I didn't really like that much was Scrappy, then again I never did like him, not even in the animated series. Despite these flaws, this film is not bad at all, and I will award a 7/10. Bethany Cox
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe director, Raja Gosnell, wanted a real-life couple to play Daphne and Fred. His first choice was Sarah Michelle Gellar and Freddie Prinze Jr.. Prinze Jr. didn't originally want to do the movie because he felt it wouldn't live up to the Scooby cartoons, but Gellar talked him into it.
- GaffesWhen the monsters take over the hotel, Daphne is wearing a purple v-neck dress and hides the Daemon Ritus in a simple purple handbag. When they wake up on the beach, she's wearing a light purple halter swimsuit and is carrying a light purple beaded handbag, and she never had time to change. When Fred's protoplasm head enters her, she is wearing her dress again.
- Crédits fousAs the Warner Bros. logo fully appears, a chunk of it is suddenly bitten off, and Scooby-Doo is heard giggling. A new logo appears, with the letters "SD" in it (for Scooby-Doo), and reading underneath "A Mystery Inc. Company".
- Versions alternatives1 second was cut (sight of potentially imitable martial arts techniques (kicks to head)) by the distributor in the UK to qualify for a 'PG' rating. An uncut '12' rating was available.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Cancun Capers (2002)
- Bandes originalesShaggy, Where Are You?
Written by David Mook and Ben Raleigh
Additional lyrics by Shaggy
Produced by Dave Kelly
Performed by Shaggy
Courtesy of Big Yard Music/MCA Records
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Scooby-Doo?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Scooby Doo
- Lieux de tournage
- Tangalooma Resort, Moreton Island, Queensland, Australie(Tangalooma Island Resort, Queensland, Australia)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 84 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 153 322 074 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 54 155 312 $US
- 16 juin 2002
- Montant brut mondial
- 275 679 958 $US
- Durée1 heure 29 minutes
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant