Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA fascinating story about a sleazy lawyer who stumbles upon enlightenment.A fascinating story about a sleazy lawyer who stumbles upon enlightenment.A fascinating story about a sleazy lawyer who stumbles upon enlightenment.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires au total
Shannah Laumeister Stern
- Marie
- (as Shannah Laumeister)
Gordon Jennison Noice
- Joe
- (as Gordon Noice)
Aimée Jeanne Bourgon
- Boyfriend Problems Client
- (as Aimee Bourgon)
Fredrick Burton
- Attorney from Ventura
- (as Fred Burton)
Conrad Angel Corral
- TV Reporter Stevens
- (as Conrad Corral)
Gloria Pryor
- Sara The Tarrot Reader
- (as Gloria Everett)
Avis à la une
I was fortunate enough to be invited to a private screening of this film. This is a moving, thought provoking film about all of us. We went to diner afterwards and its all we could talk about. For example, I thought the actress that played Mary, Daniel's wife, was dead on perfect. But others thought that Daniel and Rabi Don Carlos White Wolf were the most interesting.
It was both funny and sad and the characters were so diverse and so rich and the way they were woven around this captivating story is amazing.
It really kept you on your feet, you never knew what was going to happen next and the director ties it all together beautifully at the end.
I won't spoil the end for you, but if you have a chance to see this film, by all means see it!
PS: You may have to see it more than once to get it all!
It was both funny and sad and the characters were so diverse and so rich and the way they were woven around this captivating story is amazing.
It really kept you on your feet, you never knew what was going to happen next and the director ties it all together beautifully at the end.
I won't spoil the end for you, but if you have a chance to see this film, by all means see it!
PS: You may have to see it more than once to get it all!
The only thing that kept me watching this movie to the end was my stubbornness. I am very surprised at the decent reviews this movie has gotten-- did I watch a different movie? Did I somehow miss what I was looking for-- depth, insight, humor, characters who evoke an emotional response (any emotional response!). None of this was in "Echos". Instead, what is offered is watered down Buddhism mixed with the Celestine Prophecies and a hint of Richard Bach; terrible acting; creepy whispered voice overs... Ugh. This movie bored me and made my skin crawl at the same time. It seems that this movie was attempting to capture the joy and grace of enlightenment reached in "I Heart Huckabees"--- and failed miserably. Save yourself from watching this movie-- you will never get the time back...
Sitting through this movie made me realize just how gullible I am by believing a good tag line. This movie, on paper, looks good. I liked the idea, and am not biased toward poor cinematics, poor dialog, and poor acting if the plot or narrative of a story is really original and fresh. Often times all those overcome a poor plot in Hollywood, and sometimes, a superb plot can overcome them.
Sadly, it doesn't happen here.
This movie is a metaphorical train wreck that I kept hoping would reach the destination no matter how horrible the journey - and it doesn't.
Just skip it and watch "The grand canyon" again if you're looking for enlightenment of the human condition.
Sadly, it doesn't happen here.
This movie is a metaphorical train wreck that I kept hoping would reach the destination no matter how horrible the journey - and it doesn't.
Just skip it and watch "The grand canyon" again if you're looking for enlightenment of the human condition.
After seeing Echoes of Enlightenment at the Telluride IndieFest 2002 film festival, I was impressed with the professionalism, polish and general look of the film. The story was compelling and interesting and the acting was strong and convincing. I was particularly impressed with Giovanna Brokaw's performance, which although a small role in the grand scheme of the story and picture, comes across very powerfully.
Overall, the film tugged on my emotions on many levels. That's always a good sign for me, as I tend to be a bit cynical about films of this subject matter. However, it was a well-told story with very important social and spiritual messages.
If I were to offer it any criticism it would be that there are scenes that could be shorter and the overall length of the film is slightly longer than necessary. In my opinion it would be a more powerful film if time had been taken to remove unnecessary exposition that doesn't drive the story foreword. But these are such minor, nick picky issues that you would expect from a fellow filmmaker. So, I'll stop my critique at that note and close with saying it is a film worth seeing and watching.
If Echoes of Enlightenment is an example of Dan Copeland's true talent and not a `one shot wonder', he has the potential of being a great filmmaker.
Overall, the film tugged on my emotions on many levels. That's always a good sign for me, as I tend to be a bit cynical about films of this subject matter. However, it was a well-told story with very important social and spiritual messages.
If I were to offer it any criticism it would be that there are scenes that could be shorter and the overall length of the film is slightly longer than necessary. In my opinion it would be a more powerful film if time had been taken to remove unnecessary exposition that doesn't drive the story foreword. But these are such minor, nick picky issues that you would expect from a fellow filmmaker. So, I'll stop my critique at that note and close with saying it is a film worth seeing and watching.
If Echoes of Enlightenment is an example of Dan Copeland's true talent and not a `one shot wonder', he has the potential of being a great filmmaker.
Echoes of Enlightenment could have easily gotten lost in a maze of contradictions and metaphors. However, the narrative holds the whole script together coherently, and the metaphors add deliberate depth to the stylish visuals.
Interpreting the concept of enlightenment on screen requires the finesse of walking the fine line between proselyting and sentimentality in which Coplan skilfully surpasses. Quite remarkably, Coplan's Echoes coaxes the audience to surrender disbelief and be drawn into a vibrant world of magical realism. We cannot help but recognize a part, if not all, of ourselves in Daniel Geser.
The performance of Daniel Geser is poignantly human; shades of pathos unravelled reminiscing of Martin Sheen in Apocalypse Now! For good measure, there are sexual and violent scenes for universal appeal. Echoes of Enlightenment is an engrossing, post-viewing conversation piece, bridging pop-culture with religious classic.
Interpreting the concept of enlightenment on screen requires the finesse of walking the fine line between proselyting and sentimentality in which Coplan skilfully surpasses. Quite remarkably, Coplan's Echoes coaxes the audience to surrender disbelief and be drawn into a vibrant world of magical realism. We cannot help but recognize a part, if not all, of ourselves in Daniel Geser.
The performance of Daniel Geser is poignantly human; shades of pathos unravelled reminiscing of Martin Sheen in Apocalypse Now! For good measure, there are sexual and violent scenes for universal appeal. Echoes of Enlightenment is an engrossing, post-viewing conversation piece, bridging pop-culture with religious classic.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Echoes of Enlightenment
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant