Ann, jeune femme séduisante, veut venger la mort de son mari. Elle s'immisce dans la vie des Garrett qu'elle tient pour responsable, gagne leur confiance et utilise son charme pour les faire... Tout lireAnn, jeune femme séduisante, veut venger la mort de son mari. Elle s'immisce dans la vie des Garrett qu'elle tient pour responsable, gagne leur confiance et utilise son charme pour les faire tomber dans une tourmente sexuelle.Ann, jeune femme séduisante, veut venger la mort de son mari. Elle s'immisce dans la vie des Garrett qu'elle tient pour responsable, gagne leur confiance et utilise son charme pour les faire tomber dans une tourmente sexuelle.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- David Garrett
- (as Seth Jones)
- Mr. Slider
- (as Jay Richardson)
- Angela
- (as Melissa Brasselle)
- Detective
- (as Bill Monroe)
- Lorna
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
Then there's the plot devices. Any film that uses diabetes as a plot device, especially to attempt the murder of a character, automatically gets a thumbs-down from me. Having lived with the condition for seventeen years now, I can tell anyone who hasn't seen an example of it that it takes a lot more than our antagonist does to use someone's diabetes to kill them. It becomes quite clear from the prop syringes used in this film, as well as the fact that the diabetic stereotype (one cannot call these things characters) never checks what her blood glucose level is, that makes it clear the writers here did exactly no research into the condition. Oh, and before I forget, replacing the contents of a 10ml bottle of insulin with saline using a .5ml syringe cannot be done in a matter of minutes, or even an hour. That's one for the goof list.
I had to add this, but I have no trouble believing that nobody in the past twenty years, under the age of fifty, has died from diabetes. Gloria Foster was sixty-eight when she died, and even then, I doubt that her diabetes was the sole factor. It would take a deliberate effort on the victim's part, and one that could not possibly be sustained in light of the incredibly painful symptoms of hyperglycaemia (a word I am sure the writer here has never heard).
One will also note that while this character's synthetic insulin is replaced with saline, and her food spiked (both of which would be impossible to do without escaping notice), she still moves like a gymnast. When one's blood sugar is as high as is implied in one scene, it doesn't just make one feel heated. It makes one feel as if their bones have been hollowed out and filled with ground-up glass. This, and a few blood glucose tests, would invoke a visit to the hospital, which would absolutely defeat the purpose of this scheme.
About an hour into the film, we all drop pretensions and wind up with what is essentially a porn film without the money shot. The horrible background music makes it abundantly clear that the distributor who picked this turgid effort up is also responsible for such stinkers as All The Rage or 2001: A Space Travesty as well as such soft porn crap as Illicit Dreams 2. In short, this is an effort from a porn producer who wants to look vaguely respectable.
In my parlance, a rating of two out of ten is a damning score. This is mainly because it indicates a film that is not bad enough to be good in a reversed sort of way, but rather just plain bad. It is not as offensively awful as some of the stinkers I have rated here, but it is not that far off.
She stars as a woman gone mad after her husbands suicide, she becomes the house keeper for the family of woman she feels is responsible and through a series of mind games and manipulations aims on tearing them apart from the inside.
Trouble is we've seen this plot before, and we've seen it done a lot better.
Wuhrer is someone I consider to be a poor actress who contributes little beyond looking the part. Here she demonstrates that yet again and adds to the fairly high T&A levels.
It's generic, it's standard stuff and though it's not entirely terrible it's certainly take your brain out level entertainment.
The Good:
I'm a simple man, I see boobs I click like
The Bad:
Weak plot
Certain parts simply don't make much sense
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Your father didn't do it like that!
The thing that makes this film fun is the fact that it's completely ridiculous! The acting is terrible, and there are several sequences that are just far too convenient and/or don't make any sense at all! The film is directed by Jim Wynorski, who made Chopping Mall in 1986 before going to make a load of made for video crap, like this film. Some of the soft porn from his other films has made it into this one, and while we don't get to see much; there are plenty of breasts on display to keep things interesting. Kari Wuhrer gives by far the best performance and single handily makes the movie worth watching. She's always nice to look at, which cant really be said for the overall experience of watching this movie; but it is nice to see Re-Animator's Barbara Crampton on screen again. The plot is fairly standard stuff and although there is some attempt to build the characters, it is all a bit hard to care about. It doesn't take a genius to work out what will happen in the end, but there's plenty of laughs (for wrong reasons, mostly) on the way and while this is pretty crap, it's nice, gentle viewing and I did rather enjoy wasting time on it.
anyhow , both movies has some really hot woman with hot boobies. some weird acting and stupid end plot, but still its good.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesDirector Jim Wynorski also created the story for Dar l'invincible 2 - La porte du temps (1991), in which Kari Wuhrer also starred.
- Citations
[after Ann meets Nicole for the first time]
Ann Stewart: [to herself] I was right. You are a bitch.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Final Examination (2003)
Meilleurs choix
Détails
- Durée1 heure 32 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1