Le traquenard

Most people watch this movie after 'Suna no Onna' (Woman In The Dunes). Well, if you compare these 2 movies, the result would be defeat for Pitfall.

What is that? Story builds up, builds up, builds up and... Abruptly ends. There are question marks left over everything. No this is not a movie you can understand with watching it second time like 'Memento'.

I give 5 stars out of respect to the dead/alive ghastly effects for 1960s.

PITFALL is by far inferior to the other two collaborations of Hiroshi Teshigahara and Kobo Abe (The Face of Another/Woman in the Dunes). It was not as interesting/innovative or brilliant, it's more of a cinematic "curiosum" i would say. That doesn't mean it has no merits. I could never guess where it goes, it's overambitious, one could say it has not any identity but i love multiple-genre movies, even the ones which get a bit messy and confusing.

PITFALL starts as drama, then it becomes a drama/fantasy, then, a mystery and it ends like an existential drama. Unfortunately, it ends up less exciting as it sounds. Still it's a good movie and i disagree with the reviewers who said that zero explanations are being given. Actually, it's obvious what happened here, as long as you pay attention to all those "conflicting parties" here. Hint, it's not two but three.

Pitfall is slightly reminiscent of a wacky Hollywood comedy with the wackiness the hollywoodness and the comedyness removed. There is a murder, there is a ghost who wants to know why they were murdered, and there are a variety of people running around trying to figure out what's going on.

But unlike some 40s ghost movie, ghosts are powerless to do any more than watch and complain among themselves. And so the movie becomes more the eternal question why must we die then the typical question of who done it.

With its quirky score and offbeat premise the film is often engaging, but some of the plot points are actually pretty ridiculous and it feels like this might have made more sense as a dark comedy rather than an existentialist drama. The movie definitely needed a better ending.

While imperfect, all in all it's pretty absorbing.

From the start of the movie you follow two deserters that are mine workers. A guy dressed in white is spying on them unnoticed from a distance. Then The miners move on to new jobs but the man in white follows still unnoticed....

This movie is much more about moods I think than the actual story. It is a slow moving movie especially the first half of it. But I was absorbed about wondering who was it following him and why. I did also like the boy as the silent observer where I wondered if he would interfere with the story at a time and in what way.

I would not recommend this movie to everybody. I did enjoy it a lot but I would not consider it as a masterpiece. If you are are interested in slow but moody B&W pictures then it may be for you. If you want a bit more action then choose another movie.

This film is very difficult to find in the West. It's not on video and you'd probably have to be lucky and find it at a film festival or a revival house. It's the first collaboration between director Teshigahara, writer Kodo Abe, and composer Toru Takemitsu, who went on to make the more widely available WOMAN IN THE DUNES and FACE OF ANOTHER. It's not quite as strong as WitD but is on par with FoA. This is a satire about a deserted town who's inhabitants are ghosts swallowed up by corruption. Teshigahara's direction is solid and Takemitsu comes up with another appropriately dissonant score balancing tension and humor. It's worth seeing for anyone interested in the three principal collaborators, particularly since opportunities to see it are rare. Takemitsu in particular could almost single handedly make a movie worth watching.